Literature DB >> 35815207

Editorial: Heterogeneous Catalysis for Methane Activation.

Juanjuan Liu1, Shihui Zou2, Yun Liu3,4, Jie Fan2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-H activation; heterogeneous catalysis; methane conversion; natural gas; selectivity

Year:  2022        PMID: 35815207      PMCID: PMC9260426          DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.962033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Chem        ISSN: 2296-2646            Impact factor:   5.545


× No keyword cloud information.
Directly converting methane into value-added chemicals and fuels is a “dream reaction” in heterogeneous catalysis because it allows abundant natural gas and shale gas to be used as C1 building block for producing chemicals (Zou et al., 2021). The high molecular stability, however, makes it difficult to directly convert methane into desired chemicals in an economically attractive way. Despite the challenges, significant progress has been made recently in the selective activation of methane into methanol (Agarwal et al., 2017; Sushkevich et al., 2017; Jin et al., 2020), acetic acid (Shan et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2018), ethylene (Wang et al., 2017; Dong et al., 2022), and aromatics (Guo et al., 2014). With the ever increasing of oil-to-gas price ratio, some methane-based chemical production (e.g., ethylene production) is even expected to compete with oil-based technologies in around 20 years (Cruellas et al., 2019). For a better understanding of direct methane conversion through heterogeneous catalysis, we proposed this Research Topic and invited researches worldwide to contribute original research and review articles. Direct methane conversion reactions can operate at both high temperature and low temperature. Thermocatalytic direct non-oxidative methane conversion (DNMC) and oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) are usually conducted at high temperatures (>900 K) as they require high temperature to activate methane on the catalyst surface and desorb methyl radicals into gas phase for following transformation (Zou et al., 2021). With the development in precision synthesis, advanced in-situ characterization, and comprehensive theoretical modelling, the knowledge on OCM and DNMC has advanced considerably. Guo et al. (2014) reported that single iron sites embedded in a silica matrix enable DNMC exclusively to ethylene and aromatics. Unprecedented methane conversion at 48.1%, ethylene selectivity at 48.4%, and total hydrocarbon selectivity exceeded 99% was achieved at 1363 K. Cheng et al. achieved stable and high methane conversion and low coke selectivity in Fe/SiO2 catalyzed DNMC by using SrCe0.8Zr0.2O3−δ (SCZO) as “hydrogen transformer” to lower its local concentration, favor “soft coke” formation and mitigate the reverse reaction of DNMC. Zhou et al. investigated the activation processes of lanthanum-containing OCM catalysts by in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and online mass spectroscopy. They found that the activation of La2O2CO3 involved a migration to the surface followed by surface desorption while the activation of La(OH)3 showed three major phase change steps of the catalyst structure. Thum et al. synthesized phase-pure precursor materials for transition-metal-doped CaO and systematically investigated their performances in OCM. The results indicate that transition metal (i.e., Mn, Ni, and Zn) doping in low quantities can be applied to improve the catalytic performance of CaO, but the overall effect is limited. Combining in situ characterizations with theoretical studies, Qian et al. (2020) suggested single Mg4c 2+ site as the most active sites for Li/MgO while Kiani et al. (2021) identified isolated, pseudotetrahedral, Na-coordinated WO4 surface sites as the active sites for Mn-Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyzed OCM reaction. In contrast to the considerable progresses in mechanism studies, no breakthrough in OCM performance was obtained. The uncontrollable homogeneous transformation of ∙ CH3 in the presence of O2 thermodynamically favors the production of CO and sets a theoretical upper bound on C2 yield (∼28%). Theoretic studies suggest that the limit can be broken only if catalysts play significant role in both heterogeneous generation of ∙ CH3 and their subsequent transformations (Arutyunov and Strekova, 2017). The latter is viewed as a “miracle” and has not been achieved till recently. Zou et al. (2021) demonstrated that 5 wt% Na2WO4/SiO2 (5NaWSi) can capture CH3 ∙ radicals desorbed from La2O3 and selectively convert them into C2 species on the catalyst surface. A bifunctional OCM catalyst system, which use La2O3 as the methane activation center and 5NaWSi as CH3· coupling center, exhibits much improved C2 selectivity and achieves a C2 yield up to 10.9% at 570°C. This study confirms the feasibility of surface coupling of CH3· and point in an exciting new direction for OCM studies. Inputting external electric potentials or light irradiation as driving forces can break the thermodynamic barrier of C-H activation and facilitate direct methane conversion at low temperature. In this Research Topic, Januario et al. reviewed recent advances on heterogeneous photocatalysis for methane conversion under mild conditions into valuable products. The combination of metal and semiconductor is suggested to be a good strategy to develop more active photocatalysts. For example, Yu et al. (2020) developed an inspiring photochemical looping process for conversion of CH4 to C2H6 over Ag/H3PW12O40/TiO2, achieving a methane coupling selectivity of over 90%, a quantitative yield of ethane of over 9%, high quantum efficiency (3.5% at 362 nm) and excellent stability. Recently, an ethane production rate of over 5,000 μmol g−1 h−1 with 90% selectivity is achieved in a flow reactor using Au nanoparticle decorated ZnO/TiO2 hybrid as photocatalysts for oxidative coupling of methane (Song et al., 2021). In addition to low-temperature OCM and DNMC, considerable progresses have also been achieved in the selective oxidation of methane into oxygenated products at low temperature. Typical heterogeneous catalysts including AuPd nanoparticles (Agarwal et al., 2017; Jin et al., 2020), Rh single-atom catalysts (Shan et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2018), graphene-confined single Fe atoms (Cui et al., 2018), and metallocavitins (Shteinman). At last, our guest editor team would like to acknowledge the valuable contribution of all the authors and referees. We hope the readers enjoy the research of direct methane conversion and pursue their efforts in this important area.
  8 in total

1.  Mild oxidation of methane to methanol or acetic acid on supported isolated rhodium catalysts.

Authors:  Junjun Shan; Mengwei Li; Lawrence F Allard; Sungsik Lee; Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Direct, nonoxidative conversion of methane to ethylene, aromatics, and hydrogen.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Guo; Guangzong Fang; Gang Li; Hao Ma; Hongjun Fan; Liang Yu; Chao Ma; Xing Wu; Dehui Deng; Mingming Wei; Dali Tan; Rui Si; Shuo Zhang; Jianqi Li; Litao Sun; Zichao Tang; Xiulian Pan; Xinhe Bao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Selective anaerobic oxidation of methane enables direct synthesis of methanol.

Authors:  Vitaly L Sushkevich; Dennis Palagin; Marco Ranocchiari; Jeroen A van Bokhoven
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Hydrophobic zeolite modification for in situ peroxide formation in methane oxidation to methanol.

Authors:  Zhu Jin; Liang Wang; Erik Zuidema; Kartick Mondal; Ming Zhang; Jian Zhang; Chengtao Wang; Xiangju Meng; Hengquan Yang; Carl Mesters; Feng-Shou Xiao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Programmable heating and quenching for efficient thermochemical synthesis.

Authors:  Qi Dong; Yonggang Yao; Sichao Cheng; Konstantinos Alexopoulos; Jinlong Gao; Sanjana Srinivas; Yifan Wang; Yong Pei; Chaolun Zheng; Alexandra H Brozena; Hao Zhao; Xizheng Wang; Hilal Ezgi Toraman; Bao Yang; Ioannis G Kevrekidis; Yiguang Ju; Dionisios G Vlachos; Dongxia Liu; Liangbing Hu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Aqueous Au-Pd colloids catalyze selective CH4 oxidation to CH3OH with O2 under mild conditions.

Authors:  Nishtha Agarwal; Simon J Freakley; Rebecca U McVicker; Sultan M Althahban; Nikolaos Dimitratos; Qian He; David J Morgan; Robert L Jenkins; David J Willock; Stuart H Taylor; Christopher J Kiely; Graham J Hutchings
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  MnTiO3-driven low-temperature oxidative coupling of methane over TiO2-doped Mn2O3-Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst.

Authors:  Pengwei Wang; Guofeng Zhao; Yu Wang; Yong Lu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Single rhodium atoms anchored in micropores for efficient transformation of methane under mild conditions.

Authors:  Yu Tang; Yuting Li; Victor Fung; De-En Jiang; Weixin Huang; Shiran Zhang; Yasuhiro Iwasawa; Tomohiro Sakata; Luan Nguyen; Xiaoyan Zhang; Anatoly I Frenkel; Franklin Feng Tao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.