| Literature DB >> 35815094 |
Shamimul Hasan1, Ulfat Jahan2, Shazina Saeed3, Mandeep Kaur1, Virender Gombra1, Arpita Rai1, Shahnaz Mansoori1.
Abstract
Nutrient canals (NCs) are passages containing neurovascular bundles (blood vessels, lymph vessels, and nerves). Best visualized on mandibular anterior intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPAR), their presence is usually associated with underlying pathological such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), advanced periodontitis, calcium deficiency, tuberculosis, and disuse atrophy. This study aimed to (a) evaluate NC prevalence in patients with DM, HTN, and chronic periodontitis and (b) correlate the detection of NCs as an important preliminary screening tool for inherent systemic diseases like DM, HTN, and chronic periodontitis and as an investigative clue in age and gender determination. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 subjects. Patients with complaints of pain in the mandibular anterior teeth, deep dentinal caries, abrasion, and attrition were subjected to IOPAR of the mandibular anterior teeth region to assess NCs. An increased frequency of NCs in DM (84%), HTN (66%), and periodontitis (52%) with a significant p-value was observed. Most NCs were seen beyond the root apex (72.4%). A notable association between the duration of disease and the presence of NCs in the diabetic and hypertensive cohorts (p-value 0.047 & 0.012, respectively) was observed. However, we could not establish any association between the prevalence of nutrient canals with age and gender. Our study suggested that a higher frequency of NCs on mandibular anterior IOPAR may be employed as an ancillary screening and investigative support in underlying systemic disorders.Entities:
Keywords: chronic periodontitis; diabetes mellitus; hypertension; mandibular anterior IOPAR; nutrient canals
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35815094 PMCID: PMC9262273 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Life ISSN: 1844-122X
The distribution of nutrient canals among the various groups, sub-groups and gender.
| Groups | Subgroups | Total no. | NC +ve | NC -ve | Gender | Total no. | NC +ve | NC -ve | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Missing lower anterior teeth | 5 | 1 | 4 | Male | 28 | 6 | 22 | 0.7757 |
| No interdental bone loss | 15 | 3 | 12 | % | 21.4 | 78.5 | |||
| Interdental bone loss up to middle 1/3rd | 29 | 4 | 25 | Female | 22 | 4 | 18 | ||
| Interdental bone loss up to apical 1/3rd | 6 | 2 | 4 | % | 18.1 | 81.8 | |||
|
| Missing lower anterior teeth | 8 | 8 | 0 | Male | 22 | 20 | 2 | 0.2375 |
| No interdental bone loss | 2 | 2 | 0 | % | 90.9 | 9.1 | |||
| Interdental bone loss up to middle 1/3rd | 27 | 22 | 5 | Female | 28 | 22 | 6 | ||
| Interdental bone loss up to apical 1/3rd | 21 | 18 | 3 | % | 78.5 | 21.4 | |||
|
| Missing lower anterior teeth | 5 | 3 | 2 | Male | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0.1955 |
| No interdental bone loss | 5 | 3 | 2 | % | 76.1 | 23.8 | |||
| Interdental bone loss up to middle 1/3rd | 34 | 23 | 11 | Female | 29 | 17 | 12 | ||
| Interdental bone loss up to apical 1/3rd | 11 | 7 | 4 | % | 58.6 | 41.3 | |||
|
| Missing lower anterior teeth | 12 | 7 | 5 | Male | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0.7682 |
| No interdental bone loss | 2 | 0 | 2 | % | 50 | 50 | |||
| Interdental bone loss up to middle 1/3rd | 27 | 10 | 17 | Female | 24 | 13 | 11 | ||
| Interdental bone loss up to apical 1/3rd | 21 | 15 | 6 | % | 54.1 | 45.8 |
Figure 1The comparison of different groups regarding the presence/absence and location of nutrient canals.
Distribution of nutrient canals among the various groups and age groups.
| S.no | Age (yrs) | Controls (n) | NC +ve n (%) | NC -ve n (%) | p-value | Diabetes (n) | NC +ve n (%) | NC -ve n (%) | p-value | Hypertension (n) | NC +ve n (%) | NC -ve n (%) | p-value | Periodontitis (n) | NC +ve n (%) | NC -ve n (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 21–30 | 31 | 5 (16.12%) | 26 (83.9%) | 0.509 | - | - | - | 0.5362 | 6 | 2 (33.30%) | 4 (66.70%) | 0.482 | 10 | 2 (20%) | 8 (80%) | 0.090 |
|
| 31–40 | 12 | 1 (8.33%) | 11 (91.7%) | 15 | 13 (86.70%) | 2 (13.30%) | 9 | 4 (44.40%) | 5 (55.60%) | 13 | 9 (69.20%) | 4 (30.70%) | ||||
|
| 41–50 | 7 | 2 (28.6%) | 5 (71.42%) | 16 | 13 (81.30%) | 3 (18.70%) | 12 | 7 (58.30%) | 5 (41.70%) | 11 | 8 (72.70%) | 3 (27.30%) | ||||
|
| 51–60 | - | - | - | 13 | 12 (92.30%) | 1 (7.70%) | 17 | 12 (70.60%) | 5 (29.40%) | 11 | 5 (45.40%) | 6 (54.60%) | ||||
|
| 61–70 | - | - | - | 6 | 4 (66.70%) | 2 (33.30%) | 6 | 4 (66.70%) | 2 (33.30%) | 5 | 2 (40%) | 3 (60%) |
Presence of nutrient canals with respect to the duration of disease.
| Duration in yrs | Diabetes | No. of NC | p-value | Hypertension | No. of NC | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 25 | 39 | 0.04797* | 30 | 32 | 0.01283* |
|
| 21 | 11 | 16 | 3 | ||
|
| 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 50 | 55 | 50 | 36 |
– Significant P-value<0.05.
Comparison between groups and controls for the presence of nutrient canals.
| Groups | No. of patients showing NC | No. of patients not showing NC | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 42 | 8 | 0.000004* |
|
| 10 | 40 | |
|
| 33 | 17 | 0.000003* |
|
| 10 | 40 | |
|
| 26 | 24 | 0.00085* |
|
| 10 | 40 |
– Significant P-value<0.05.
Comparison of inter-groups regarding the presence of nutrient canals.
| Groups | No of patients showing NC | No of patients not showing NC | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 42 | 8 | 0.0028* |
|
| 33 | 17 | |
|
| 26 | 24 |
– Significant P-value<0.05.
Figure 2Intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPARs) among various groups. (A) and (B) depicts the radiographic visualization of nutrient canals in control, diabetes, hypertension and chronic periodontitis groups.