| Literature DB >> 35814839 |
Andrey Korshunov1, Vladimir Vagner2, Vladimir Konev3, Sergey Moskovskiy3, Kirill Kuryatnikov1, Anna Skurikhina4, Vladislav Yakovlev4, Adel Nurakhmetova4.
Abstract
Purpose: This work aimed to study the rate and quality of maturation of the mineral component of retained teeth 3.8, 4.8 and lower jaw fragment of a human in connective tissue dysplasia in different periods of postpartum ontogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Bone tissue; Collagen fibrils; Mineral component; Osteoporosis; Tooth
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814839 PMCID: PMC9263759 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Dent J ISSN: 1013-9052
Macroscopic structure of the root part of teeth 38, 48 in different periods of postpartum ontogenesis.
| Age group/Indicator | 31–40 years | 41–50 years | 51–60 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of roots | 1.7 ± 0.2/1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.3/1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2/1.9 ± 0.3 |
| Root length, mm | 10.9 ± 1.3/10.7 ± 1.1 | 10.8 ± 0.8/10.9 ± 1.1 | 10.6 ± 0.5/10.7 ± 0.6 |
Analysis of the densitometric density of the enamel mineral component of the teeth 38, 48 and the mandibular bone in different periods of postpartum ontogenesis.
| Points for measuring the optical density of the mandibular hard tissues | 31–40 years with CTD/without CTD | 41–50 years with CTD/without CTD | 51–60 years with CTD/without CTD |
|---|---|---|---|
| e1b of tooth enamel (units) | 827.39 ± 20.21*/655.11 ± 21.38** | 884.37 ± 24.23*/611.37 ± 18.83** | 908.12 ± 25.11*/801.48 ± 22.34** |
| e2d of tooth enamel (units) | 879.97 ± 22.14*/698.52 ± 25.59** | 902.44 ± 17.26*/632.13 ± 19.25** | 964.57 ± 23.17*/804.52 ± 23.08** |
| m1vl of mandibular (units) | 478.32 ± 18.77*/404.98 ± 24.21** | 445.67 ± 21.51*/395.33 ± 25.56** | 419.82 ± 23.18*/370.15 ± 24.89** |
| m2al of mandibular (units) | 532.65 ± 15.87*/460.47 ± 25.92** | 498.69 ± 18.11/447.6 ± 25.31** | 491.14 ± 19.88/424.58 ± 26.72** |
| Ams (0) | 138.51 + 3.3/99.23 + 3.8** | 139.92 + 3.8/110.45 + 5.7** | 143.47 + 3.7/115.69 + 4.9** |
| Amd (0) | 137.13 + 3.1/102.34 + 3.6** | 137.78 + 3.5/127.41 + 3.7** | 145.98 + 4.2/132.56 + 4.1** |
Note: statistical significance was calculated * – between age groups; ** – between groups with and without CTD (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1Orientation of enamel prisms in the group without CTD in different periods of human postpartum ontogenesis (electron microscopy). P. ×1000: a) at 31–40 years; b) at 41–50 years; c) at 51–60 years.
Fig. 2Orientation of enamel prisms in the group with CTD in different periods of human postpartum ontogenesis (electron microscopy). P. ×1000: a) at 31–40 years; b) at 41–50 years; c) at 51–60 years.
Dimensional parameters of the mineral component and organic matrix of teeth enamel 38, 48 in different periods of postpartum ontogenesis.
| Indicators | 31–40 years with CTD/without CTD | 41–50 years with CTD/without CTD | 51–60 years with CTD/without CTD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length of enamel prisms, nm | 5.58 ± 0.22*/4.26 ± 0.24** | 6.01 ± 0.26/3.82 ± 0.21 | 6.23 ± 0.14/3.96 ± 0.27 |
| Width of enamel prisms, nm | 4.76 ± 0.25*/4.01 ± 0.21** | 5.12 ± 0.11/3.12 ± 0.18** | 5.21 ± 0.27/5.28 ± 0.24 |
| Distance between enamel prisms, nm | 0.53 ± 0.03*/3.24 ± 0.46 | 0.37 ± 0.04/3.33 ± 0.12 | 0.32 ± 0.01/3.55 ± 0.22 |
| Prismatic shell size, nm | мeнee 1.0/мeнee 1.0 | мeнee 1.0/мeнee 1.0 | мeнee 1.0/мeнee 1.0 |
| Size of the inter-prism gap, nm | 2.09 ± 0.28/3.05 ± 0.52 | 2.06 ± 0.21/3.14 ± 0.47 | 1.98 ± 0.17/2.74 ± 0.65 |
Note: statistical significance was calculated * – between age groups; ** – between groups with and without CTD (p < 0.05).
Age-related changes in morphometric parameters of the lower jaw in the group with connective tissue dysplasia (M ± m, P).
| Morphometric indicators/Age | 31–40 years | 41–50 years | 51–60 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume density of compact matter (cortical layer, in relative units) | 35.22 ± 3.1* | 28.12 ± 3.9* | 26.53 ± 2.3* |
| Volume density of cancellous bone (r.u.) | 39.98 ± 6.9* | 34.57 ± 5.5 | 30.91 ± 3.67* |
| Index of the ratio of spongy matter to compact matter | 1.13 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.08 ± 0.2 |
| Average number of haversacks in the field of view | 4.5 ± 0.2* | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.2 |
| Average number of vessels in the field of view | 16.02 ± 2.01* | 14.23 ± 1.57* | 12.57 ± 2.1* |
| Average diameter of the haversacks | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 3.51 ± 0.2 | 3.44 ± 0.3 |
Note: statistical significance was calculated * – between age groups (p < 0.05).