| Literature DB >> 35814354 |
Tianjin Yao1,2, Xiuye Yang3.
Abstract
This paper adopts the method of psychological data analysis to conduct in-depth research and analysis on the correlation between teachers' classroom teaching behaviors and students' knowledge acceptance. Firstly, this paper proposes a health factor prediction model, which is specifically divided into clustering and then classification model and a clustering and classification synthesis model. The classroom learning process is coded, sampled, and quantified to obtain data on students' learning behaviors, and a visualization system based on classroom students' learning behaviors is designed and developed to record and analyze students' behaviors in the classroom learning process and grasp students' classroom learning. These two models use algorithms to fine-grained divide the dataset from the perspective of subject users and mental health factors, respectively, and then use decision tree algorithms to classify and predict the mental health factor information by the subject user base information. Second, based on the collected datasets, we designed comparison experiments to validate the clustering-then-classification model and the integrated clustering-classification model and selected the optimal model for comparison. Teachers should increase effective praise and encouragement behaviors; teachers should increase meaningful teacher-student interaction behaviors; teachers should be proficient in teaching media technology to reduce unnecessary time wastage. Strategies to enhance teachers' TPACK include enriching teachers' knowledge base of CK, TK, and PK; developing teachers' integration thinking; and enriching teachers' types of activities for integrating technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814354 PMCID: PMC9208920 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2661398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Occup Ther Int ISSN: 0966-7903 Impact factor: 1.565
Rules for coding classroom teaching behaviors.
| Dimension | Serial number | Content | Behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classroom teaching behavior dimension | 1 | Acceptance and positive feelings | Teachers |
| 2 | Praise or encouragement | ||
| 3 | Accept or use student claims | ||
| 4 | Ask questions | ||
| 5 | Students give speeches (especially in front of teachers) | Students | |
| 6 | Student collaboration | ||
| 7 | Students browse resources or think about problems independently | ||
| 8 | Students create work (e.g., composition and programming) |
Figure 1Psychological data analysis framework.
Figure 2Theme distribution map.
Faculty teaching behavior coding.
| Dimension | Serial number | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Classroom teaching behavior dimension | B 1 | Students give speeches (especially in front of teachers) |
| B 2 | Student collaboration | |
| B 3 | Students browse resources or think about problems independently | |
| B 4 | Students create work (e.g., composition and programming) | |
| B 5 | Acceptance and positive feelings | |
| B 6 | Praise or encouragement | |
| B 7 | Accept or use student claims | |
| B 8 | Ask questions |
Figure 3The proportion of time spent on each element of teacher A's TPACK.
Figure 4Relevance results.
Adjusted residuals.
| Coding | B 1 | B 2 | B 3 | B 4 | B 5 | B 6 | B 7 | B 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B 1 | 0.477 | 0.579 | 0.764 | 0.992 | 0.954 | 0.658 | 0.534 | 0.591 |
| B 2 | 0.899 | 0.449 | 0.857 | 0.945 | 0.922 | 0.462 | 0.884 | 0.61 |
| B 3 | 0.958 | 0.662 | 0.786 | 0.514 | 0.958 | 0.43 | 0.422 | 0.895 |
| B 4 | 0.615 | 0.656 | 0.88 | 0.987 | 0.493 | 0.725 | 0.989 | 0.579 |
| B 5 | 0.598 | 0.741 | 0.506 | 0.997 | 0.872 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.403 |
| B 6 | 0.811 | 0.485 | 0.871 | 0.7 | 0.461 | 0.421 | 0.877 | 0.567 |
| B 7 | 0.986 | 0.812 | 0.901 | 0.541 | 0.631 | 0.739 | 0.781 | 0.666 |
| B 8 | 0.581 | 0.8 | 0.445 | 0.534 | 0.909 | 0.589 | 0.46 | 0.906 |