| Literature DB >> 35814142 |
Hong Zhao1, Lijuan Song2.
Abstract
The experience value of online education is a hot topic in both theoretical and practical circles, but research on its mechanism of action is limited. Therefore, this study systematically investigates the relationship between brand image, experience value, and continuance intention through a theoretical analysis of brand image, and discusses the boundary role of effective commitment in it. In this study, 475 users were used to conduct structural equation modeling analysis. The results of the study found that experience value had a positive and significant effect on user continuance intention under the significant influence of brand image, but affective commitment did not play a positive moderating role in the relationship between experience value and continuance intention. This study examines the mechanism of the antecedents and consequences of experience value, and provides a new direction for the construction of online education and the development of online education and marketing strategies.Entities:
Keywords: affective commitment; brand image; continuance intention; experience value; marketing strategies; online education
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814142 PMCID: PMC9266343 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical model.
Variables and measurement item.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Brand image | BI1. The Thousand Chat brand has been established. | Sasmita and Mohd, |
| BI2. The Thousand Chat has a clear image. | ||
| BI3. The Thousand Chat has a differentiated image in comparison with the other brand. | ||
| Experience value | EV1. The Thousand Chat has brought me a lot of joy. | Sheth et al., |
| EV2. Thousand Chat allows me to find amazing products or special events. | ||
| EV3. Thousand Chat can make me relax and enjoy myself. | ||
| EV4. In short, Thousand Chat makes me feel the value. | ||
| Continuance intention | CI1. I share the experience of using TikTok with my friends. | Bhattacherjee, |
| CI2. When I have the need, I use TikTok. | ||
| CI3. In the future, I will continue to use Tikka. | ||
| CI4. I recommend TikTok to my friends. | ||
| Affective commitment | AC1. When I use TikTok, I immerse myself unconsciously. | Zhou et al., |
| AC2. I have a deep affection for TikTok. | ||
| AC3. TikTok gives me a strong sense of belonging. | ||
| AC4. TikTok is very attractive to me. |
Descriptive statistical analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 239 | 50.3 | 50.3 |
| Female | 236 | 49.7 | 100.0 | |
| Age (year) | 19 or less | 9 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| 20–29 | 187 | 39.4 | 41.3 | |
| 30–39 | 213 | 44.8 | 86.1 | |
| 40–49 | 47 | 9.9 | 96.0 | |
| 50 or above | 19 | 4.0 | 100.0 | |
| Marriage | Married | 321 | 67.6 | 67.6 |
| Unmarried | 151 | 31.8 | 99.4 | |
| Divorce | 3 | 0.6 | 100.0 | |
| Profession | Student | 47 | 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Freelance | 30 | 6.3 | 16.2 | |
| Executive in private enterprise | 158 | 33.3 | 49.5 | |
| Civil servant | 210 | 44.2 | 93.7 | |
| Clerk in state owned enterprise | 24 | 5.1 | 98.7 | |
| Executive in private enterprise | 6 | 1.3 | 100.0 | |
| Education | College and blow | 57 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Undergraduate | 375 | 78.9 | 90.9 | |
| Master's degree and above | 43 | 9.1 | 100.0 | |
| Consumption (RMB) | Below 2,000 | 25 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| 2,000–3,999 | 71 | 14.9 | 20.2 | |
| 4,000–5,999 | 114 | 24.0 | 44.2 | |
| 6,000 or more | 265 | 55.8 | 100.0 | |
| Continuous use time (year) | less than 1 | 74 | 15.6 | 15.6 |
| 1–2 | 199 | 41.9 | 57.5 | |
| Over 3 | 202 | 42.5 | 100.0 |
Confirmatory factor analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand image (BI) | BI1 | 0.816 | 0.824 | 0.612 |
| BI2 | ||||
| BI3 | ||||
| Experience value (EV) | EV1 | 0.832 | 0.832 | 0.555 |
| EV2 | ||||
| EV3 | ||||
| EV4 | ||||
| Continuance intention (CI) | CI1 | 0.878 | 0.882 | 0.657 |
| CI2 | ||||
| CI3 | ||||
| CI4 | ||||
| Affective commitment (AC) | AC1 | 0.848 | 0.852 | 0.592 |
| AC2 | ||||
| AC3 | ||||
| AC4 |
Discriminant validity for the measurement model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Brand image (BI) | 4.654 | 1.231 | 0.612 |
| |||
| 2. Experience value (EV) | 5.012 | 0.999 | 0.555 | 0.436 |
| ||
| 3. Continuance intention (CI) | 5.756 | 0.901 | 0.657 | 0.354 | 0.484 |
| |
| 4. Affective commitment (AC) | 5.325 | 1.002 | 0.592 | 0.515 | 0.613 | 0.619 |
|
The diagonal value is the square root of AVE.
Regression coefficient.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1: BI->EV | 0.275 | 0.037 | 7.521 | 0.435 |
|
| H2: EV->CI | 0.397 | 0.059 | 6.670 | 0.407 |
|
| H3: BI->CI | 0.108 | 0.033 | 3.237 | 0.175 |
|
BI, Brand Image; EV, Experience Value; AC, Affective Commitment; CI, Continuance Intention.
p-value < 0.01,
p-value < 0.001.
The analysis of moderating effect.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance intention (CI) | Experience value (EV) | 0.187 | 0.052 | 3.569 |
|
| Affective commitment (AC) | 0.464 | 0.063 | 7.418 |
| |
| Experience value (EV) × Affective commitment (AC) | −0.034 | 0.034 | −1.015 | ns |
p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.