| Literature DB >> 35814035 |
Kannan Raman1, Kalirajan Rajagopal1, Fahadul Islam2, Manish Dhawan3,4, Saikat Mitra5, Baliwada Aparna1, Potlapati Varakumar1, Gowramma Byran1, Om Prakash Choudhary6, Talha Bin Emran2,7.
Abstract
Despite the fact that various therapeutic compounds are being investigated, there is still a scarcity of effective and reliable therapeutic regimens to treat COVID-19. Ever since the COVID-19 pandemic, a diversity of traditional herbal treatments has been investigated to cure infected people, either alone or in conjunction with mainstream pharmaceuticals, with encouraging outcomes. In this article, we look at the latest research on the usage of natural products to alleviate the severity of COVID-19. To determine the activity of the natural products, act against SARS-CoV-2 to various targets like Mpro, ACE-II, papain-like, chymotrypsin-like proteases, and some antiviral targets. The processes underlying this preventative or therapeutic action are also examined. We used PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the WHO site to perform our review. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 impacts of various herbal extracts and purified compounds may be mediated via direct prevention of viral replication or entrance. Interestingly, certain items might avert SARS-CoV-2 from infecting human cells by blocking the ACE-2 protein or the serine protease TMPRRS2. Natural products have also been stated to suppress proteins intricate in the virus life cycle, like papain-like and chymotrypsin-like proteases. To conclude, natural products can be used alone or in combination as remedies or treatments for COVID-19. In addition, their compositions may provide insight into the development of effective and reliable antiviral drugs.Entities:
Keywords: ACE2; COVID-19; Herbal medicine; Natural compounds; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814035 PMCID: PMC9249430 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Natural sources examined towards SARS-CoV-2.
| SL. No. | Plant family | Source | Strains | Assay name | Dose | Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hirsutenone | In vitro | FRET | 0–200 μM | A dosage-based suppression of SARS-CoV-PLpro action | [ | |
| 2. | Ethanol and methanol | In vitro | ELISA and FRET | 0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 μg/ml | Both extracts repressed the SARS-CoV repetition at 25 and 200 mg/ml concentrations | [ | |
| 3. | Psoralidin | In vitro | Fluorogenic | 0–100 μM | Suppression of SARS-CoV PLpro in a dosage-based | [ | |
| 4. | Ethanol extract of Dieckol | In vitro | FRET | 0–200 μM | Suppression of SARS-CoV- 3CL (pro) | [ | |
| 5. | Scutellarein | In vitro | FRET | 0.01–10 μM | Suppression of SARS-CoV helicase through disturbing the ATPase action | [ | |
| 6. | Methanol extract of Terrestrimine | In vitro | Fluorogen | 1, 10, 100, 1000 μM | Suppression of SARS-CoV – Plpro through IC50 = 15.8 ± 0.6 μM | [ | |
| 7. | Methanol extract of Terrestrimine | In vitro | Cytopathic impact suppression | 0–600 μg/ml/72 h | Suppression of SARS-CoV-2 repetition | [ | |
| 8. | Emodin | In vitro | Luciferase assay | 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 & 400 μM | Obstruction of binding SARS-CoV S receptor and ACE2 | [ | |
| 9. | Emodin | In vitro | Luciferase assay | 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 & 400 μM | Slight active concentration | [ | |
| 10. | Xanthoangelol E (Ethanol extract) | In vitro | FRET | 0, 12, 5, 25, 50 μM | A dosage dependent suppression of SARS-CoV-PLpro activity | [ | |
| 11. | Xanthoangelol E (Ethanol extract) | In vitro | FRET | 0, 12, 5, 25, 50 μM | A dosage dependent suppression of SARS-CoV-3CLpro activity | [ |
Traditional applications of therapeutic species and combinations with probable antivirus impacts.
| SL. No. | Plant family | Traditional applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Tumor, Blood, and lymphatic disease | [ | |
| 2. | Infections, | [ | |
| 3. | Hypertension, | [ | |
| 4. | Eczema, | [ | |
| 5. | Inflammations andFever | [ | |
| 6. | CardiovascularandHormonaldisorders | [ | |
| 7. | Liver disorders and Diabetes | [ | |
| 8. | Inflammations | [ | |
| 9. | Constipation and Liver disorders | [ | |
| 10. | Dysentery, Infections | [ |
Fig. 1Natural-based compound that performs as viral helicase action.
Fig. 2Natural-based compounds that perform as antagonists of ACE2.
Fig. 3Natural-based compounds that perform as antagonists against TMPRSS2.
Fig. 4Natural compounds that work as antagonists of PLpro.
Fig. 5Natural compounds perform as antagonists of 3CL (pro).
Fig. 6Overview of probable anti-COVID-19 activities of organic compounds.
Fig. 7Auspicious natural-substance-inspired ivermectin for the action of COVID-19.
Antivirus natural metabolites confirmed in vitro.
| SL. No. | Natural source | Compound name | Method used | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Black tea | Tannic acid | Fluorogenic substrate peptide | [ |
| 2. | Leukamenin | Not informed | [ | |
| 3. | Ethanol extract | MTS assay | [ | |
| 4. | Chloroform extract | MTS assay | ||
| 5. | Tryptanthrin | MTT assay | [ | |
| 6. | Fangchinoline | MRC-5 system | [ | |
| 7. | Cepharanthine | MRC-5 system | ||
| 8. | Mycalamide A | Not informed | [ | |
| 9. | Ethanolic extract of Friedelin | MRC-5 system | [ | |
| 10. | Ethanolic extract of Friedelanol | MRC-5 system |