Literature DB >> 35814029

Statistical and Machine Learning Methods Applied to the Prediction of Different Tropical Rainfall Types.

Jiayi Wang1, Raymond K W Wong1, Mikyoung Jun2, Courtney Schumacher3, R Saravanan3, Chunmei Sun2.   

Abstract

Predicting rain from large-scale environmental variables remains a challenging problem for climate models and it is unclear how well numerical methods can predict the true characteristics of rainfall without smaller (storm) scale information. This study explores the ability of three statistical and machine learning methods to predict 3-hourly rain occurrence and intensity at 0.5° resolution over the tropical Pacific Ocean using rain observations the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite radar and large-scale environmental profiles of temperature and moisture from the MERRA-2 reanalysis. We also separated the rain into different types (deep convective, stratiform, and shallow convective) because of their varying kinematic and thermodynamic structures that might respond to the large-scale environment in different ways. Our expectation was that the popular machine learning methods (i.e., the neural network and random forest) would outperform a standard statistical method (a generalized linear model) because of their more flexible structures, especially in predicting the highly skewed distribution of rain rates for each rain type. However, none of the methods obviously distinguish themselves from one another and each method still has issues with predicting rain too often and not fully capturing the high end of the rain rate distributions, both of which are common problems in climate models. One implication of this study is that machine learning tools must be carefully assessed and are not necessarily applicable to solving all big data problems. Another implication is that traditional climate model approaches are not sufficient to predict extreme rain events and that other avenues need to be pursued.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convective storms; Generalized linear model; Neural network; Precipitation occurrence; Rain rate extremes; Random forest

Year:  2021        PMID: 35814029      PMCID: PMC9269146          DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ac371f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res Commun        ISSN: 2515-7620


  6 in total

1.  Artificial convolution neural network techniques and applications for lung nodule detection.

Authors:  S B Lo; S A Lou; J S Lin; M T Freedman; M V Chien; S K Mun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.

Authors:  Jürgen Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2014-10-13

3.  The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2).

Authors:  Ronald Gelaro; Will McCarty; Max J Suárez; Ricardo Todling; Andrea Molod; Lawrence Takacs; Cynthia Randles; Anton Darmenov; Michael G Bosilovich; Rolf Reichle; Krzysztof Wargan; Lawrence Coy; Richard Cullather; Clara Draper; Santha Akella; Virginie Buchard; Austin Conaty; Arlindo da Silva; Wei Gu; Gi-Kong Kim; Randal Koster; Robert Lucchesi; Dagmar Merkova; Jon Eric Nielsen; Gary Partyka; Steven Pawson; William Putman; Michele Rienecker; Siegfried D Schubert; Meta Sienkiewicz; Bin Zhao
Journal:  J Clim       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.148

4.  Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models.

Authors:  Stephan Rasp; Michael S Pritchard; Pierre Gentine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rainfall From Resolved Rather Than Parameterized Processes Better Represents the Present-Day and Climate Change Response of Moderate Rates in the Community Atmosphere Model.

Authors:  Gabriel J Kooperman; Michael S Pritchard; Travis A O'Brien; Ben W Timmermans
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 6.660

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.