Literature DB >> 35813783

A Novel 3-Step Tuning Fork Hearing Test; Preliminary Report on Its Clinical Utility.

Mohan Bansal1,2, Alaap Shah3, Bhavik Gosai4, Pankaj Shah5.   

Abstract

It is pertinent to have a Tuning Fork Hearing Test that stand-alone can detect severities (Mild, Moderate, Severe and Profound) and the types of hearing losses (Conductive, Sensorineural, and Mixed). A novel 3-Step Tuning Fork Hearing Test (3-STFHT) was attempted for the first time that could detect both the types and the severities of hearing losses. The study was aimed to describe the method of the 3-STFHT and evaluate its clinical utility and reliability. Research Design: Hospital-based observational study of a diagnostic tool. Settings: Otorhinolaryngology Department of a tertiary care medical college hospital. Subjects: 108 adult patients (216 ears) who required hearing evaluation. Main Outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of novel 3-STFHT were assessed by comparing its results with the reports of pure tone audiometry in detecting the type and severity of hearing loss. The new 3-STFHT was found very effective (100% sensitivity and specificity) in detecting conductive and profound sensorineural hearing losses. The sensitivity in detecting sensorineural hearing loss was found 97%-100%. The sensitivity was observed relatively low (92%) at detecting mixed hearing loss. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the 3-STFHT in detecting the types of hearing losses was found 97% and 86% respectively. The novel 3-STFHT, which is simple and convenient, was found very effective in detecting the types and severity of hearing losses. The 3-STFHT can be an important tool in otorhinolaryngology practice and in primary care setting for detecting and screening the types and severities of hearing losses. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03095-0. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing loss; Hearing tests; Rinne’s test; Tuning fork tests; Weber’s test

Year:  2022        PMID: 35813783      PMCID: PMC9256874          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03095-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  16 in total

1.  The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.

Authors:  R A Chole; G B Cook
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1988-04

2.  Is there still a role for tuning-fork tests?

Authors:  G G Browning
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-08

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test.

Authors:  G G Browning; I R Swan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-26

4.  Assessment of Hearing During the Early Years of the American Otological Society.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Robert K Jackler
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Hearing loss.

Authors:  Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Early history of tuning-fork tests.

Authors:  M Ng; R K Jackler
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1993-01

7.  Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.

Authors:  J M Burkey; W H Lippy; A G Schuring; F M Rizer
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-01

8.  Factors associated with developing cholesteatoma: a study of 45,980 children with middle ear disease.

Authors:  Katrina Spilsbury; Ian Miller; James B Semmens; Francis J Lannigan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.

Authors:  D M Miltenburg
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1994-08

10.  Otitis media and CNS complications.

Authors:  M Munz; J P Farmer; L Auger; A M O'Gorman; M D Schloss
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1992-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.