| Literature DB >> 35813646 |
Caroline de Gouveia Buff Passone1,2, Gaëlle Vermillac2, Willem Staels1,3,4, Alix Besancon2, Dulanjalee Kariyawasam2,5, Cécile Godot2, Cécile Lambe6, Cécile Talbotec6,7, Muriel Girard8, Christophe Chardot9, Laureline Berteloot10, Taymme Hachem11, Alexandre Lapillonne11, Amélie Poidvin12, Caroline Storey12, Mathieu Neve13, Cosmina Stan13, Emmanuelle Dugelay14, Anne-Laure Fauret-Amsellem15, Yline Capri15, Hélène Cavé15, Marina Ybarra16, Vikash Chandra1,17, Raphaël Scharfmann1, Elise Bismuth12, Michel Polak2, Jean Claude Carel12, Bénédicte Pigneur6, Jacques Beltrand1,2,5.
Abstract
Aims/Hypothesis: Caused by biallelic mutations of the gene encoding the transcription factor RFX6, the rare Mitchell-Riley syndrome (MRS) comprises neonatal diabetes, pancreatic hypoplasia, gallbladder agenesis or hypoplasia, duodenal atresia, and severe chronic diarrhea. So far, sixteen cases have been reported, all with a poor prognosis. This study discusses the multidisciplinary intensive clinical management of 4 new cases of MRS that survived over the first 2 years of life. Moreover, it demonstrates how the mutations impair the RFX6 function.Entities:
Keywords: Mitchell–Riley syndrome; RFX6; beta-cell function; diabetes technology; neonatal diabetes mellitus; parenteral nutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35813646 PMCID: PMC9257252 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.802351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Clinical characteristics of four reported patients.
| Case number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic mutation | c.1517T>G, (p.Val506Gly) | c.541 C>T (p.Arg181Trp) | c.541 C>T (p.Arg181Trp) | c.505-2A>G et c.2782A>G |
| Sex | F | M | F | M |
| Consanguinity | Yes | Yes, type 2 diabetes in second-degree relatives | Yes | No |
| Origin | Caribbean (Martinique Island) | French (gypsy community) | Portuguese and Spanish | French and Spanish |
| Gestational age (weeks)/birth weight (g)/birth length (cm) | 35/1,390/no information | 37 + 4/1,290/38 | 36+1/1,765/43 | 37+4/1,984/44 |
| Intestinal atresia | Duodenum and jejunum | Duodenum | Duodenum | Triple atresia (two in duodenum, one in jejunum) |
| Gut malrotation | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Histology abnormalities | Meckel’s diverticulum | No | Meckel’s diverticulum, ectopic pancreatic tissue | Meckel’s diverticulum. Ectopic gastric tissue in duodenum |
| Chronic diarrhea | ++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
| PN dependency index* last evaluation | No PN (stopped at 1 year old) | 82% | 58% | 119% |
| Enteral nutrition a day | No need for enteral nutrition | 2 bolus of 22 ml/kg each through gastrostomy | No need for enteral nutrition | No enteral nutrition due to no tolerance |
| Feeding disorders | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Pancreatic anomaly | Global hypoplasia | Hypoplastic tail and agenesis of the body | Global hypoplasia | Annular pancreas |
| Pancreatic enzyme replacement | Yes, for a year, not effective | Yes, not effective | Yes, partial effect | Yes, partial effect |
| Cholestatic diseases | No | Yes, for 1.5 years | Yes, 2–7 months old | Yes, from day 1 to liver transplant |
| Liver failure | No | No | No | Yes, liver transplant at 7 months old |
| Anemia/treatment | Yes/RBC transfusion and IV iron supplementation | Yes/RBC transfusion and IV iron supplementation | Yes/repeated RBC transfusions | Yes/RBC transfusions |
| Other clinical features | G6PD deficiency | Pica disorder | Persistent acidosis | – |
| Epiphyseal dysplasia | Intermittent acidosis | |||
| Flat nails and brittle teeth | ||||
| Motor development | Adequate | Walked at 20 months | Small delay | Small delay |
| Walked at 20 months | Walked at 14 months | |||
| Age at last evaluation | 13 years 6 months | 7 years 2 months | 2 years 6 months | 2 years 3 months |
RBC, red blood cells; PN, parenteral nutrition.
*PN dependency index: ratio of non-protein-energy intake provided by PN for achieving normal or catching up body weight gain.
Figure 1Comparison of stature (A) and (B) Body Mass Index evolution of four patient using standard deviation scores according to WHO growth charts. BMI, Body M ass Index; P, patient, SD, Score Deviation.
Figure 2Diabetes Treatment and Nutrition follow-up of four patients with RFX-6 mutation. PN, parenteral nutrition; CSII, Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion System; Hb1Ac, glycosylated hemoglobin; CGM, continuous monitoring system; GTT, gastrostomy; HypoMinimyzer, The Predictive Hypoglycemia Minimizer System.
Figure 3Conti nous Glucose Monitoring da ta from Mini Med 640G System from patients 3- M utR181W (A) and 4- (c.505-2A>G/ c.2782A>G ) (B). The traces represents glucose variability during the day. Red colour cshowed hypoglycemic periods (less than 70mg/dl) and yellow periods represents hyperglycemias ( more than 140-180 mg/dl) In figure (A), patient 3 presents recurrent hypoglycemic episodes during daily period when she was disconnect from parenteral nutrition (4 a.m.) and frequent hyperglycemia during night period. Basal rate was 0.2UI of insulin during parenteral nutrition (around 10 times more than during the day) Patient 4 had lower glycemic variability, but some hypoglycemia du ring the day. He received parenteral nutrition and few oral nutrition.
Figure 4Patient 2 (R181W) 3D-MRJ T2 (A) and Tl-weighted (B) with volume rendering reconstructions (C, D). The MRI shows a small pancreas (white arrowheads), especially in the bod y and tail, with a volume estimated between 13 and 15.5 cc. For comparison, an aged-matched control patient has a pancreatic volume of 45 cc.
Figure 5Transactivation of Insulin promoter by RFX6WT, RFX6R181W and RFX6V506G in EndoC-βH2 cells. (A) Schematic presentation of the functional domains in RFX6 protein and the position of mutations. (B) Insulin promoter activity in human beta cells model EndoC-βH2 cells determined by firefly luciferase (pGL4.12huINS-378to+42), which was cotransfected with either RFX6WT or RFX6R181W or RFX6V506G and with Renilla luciferase (pGL4.72-TK[hRlucCP]) to correct for variation in transfection efficiency. Results are presented as fold increase over empty control vector. Da ta are mean of ± SEM of three to four experiments. ***p < 0.001; ns, non significant.
Figure 6Differential activation of R FX6 targets gene expression by wtRFX6 or Mu tR181W-R FX 6 or MutV506G-RFX6 in EndoC-βH2 cells. (A) Schematic presentation of the constructs with trans-activation domain VP16 and I ERS-EGFP used to overexpress wt or Mut R FX6 proteins (B) Fort y-eight hours posttransfection, GFP+ cells were FACS sorted and analyzed for the expression of R FX6 by RTq PCR in EndoC-βH2. (C–F) RT qPCR analysis of CACNAlA, CACNA1C, CACNA1D and G PR 68 in EndoC-βH2 post 48h transfected with wt or Mut RFX6. Da ta are mean of ± SEM of three to four experiments. *p < 0.05; **p <0.01; ns, non significant.
Figure 7Expression and localization of of wtRFX6 or MutR181W-RFX6 or MutV506G-RFX6 in HEK293. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with pRIG-empty or pRIG-wtRFX6 or pRIG-MutR181W or pRIGMutV506G -R FX6 constructs and immunostained for RFX6 post 48 h of transfection. Scale bar 25 μm. Legend: (A) Vector control, (B) wtRFX6, (C) Mut R181W-RFX6, (D) MutV506G-RFX6.