| Literature DB >> 35813627 |
Verdiana Caironi1, Fabián Pitoia2, Pierpaolo Trimboli3,4.
Abstract
After the beginning of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, several reports of thyroid disease possibly related to the COVID-19 vaccination progressively appeared in the literature, raising the question of whether the thyroid disorder might be a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine complication. The aim of this study was to analyze the data about COVID-19 vaccination and thyroid disease, evaluate the size and quality of related literature, assess the type of these events, and investigate their timing of onset with respect the vaccination. Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane were systematically reviewed until February 2022 to retrieve the largest number of original papers, case reports, and case series articles reporting thyroid disease after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Forty-six articles were included with a total of 99 patients aged from 26 to 73 years were described, of whom 74.75% female. Regarding the vaccination received, 49.49% of patients received Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech), 14.14% CoronaVac (Sinovac), 12.12% Vaxzevria (Oxford/Astrazeneca), 11.11% Spikevax (Moderna), 3.03% Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Johnson & Johnson), one patient Covaxin (Bharat Biotech) and one patient Convidecia (Cansino). In 7 cases the thyroid disorder developed after the third dose with a combination of different vaccines. Regarding the type of thyroid disorder, 59 were subacute thyroiditis (SAT), 29 Graves' disease (GD), 2 co-occurrence of SAT and GD, 6 painless thyroiditis (PT), and single cases of thyroid eye disease and hypothyroidism associated with mixedema. The timeline between vaccination and thyroid disorder ranged between 0.5 to 60 days, with an average of 10.96 days. Considering the limited follow-up time, a complete remission was reported in most of SAT and PT cases while a persistence was observed in GD. In conclusion, both size and quality of published data about thyroid inconveniences after COVID-19 vaccination are limited; thyroid disorders may occur within 2 months after COVID-19 vaccination; among all thyroid diseases after COVID-19 vaccination, GD and SAT seem to be more frequent.Entities:
Keywords: Graves’ disease (GD); SARS-CoV-2; side-effects; subacute thyroiditis (SAT); thyroid; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35813627 PMCID: PMC9259875 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.900964
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Flow of records.
Figure 2Relative prevalence of thyroid diseases recorded after vaccination (left) and distribution according to vaccine (right).
Study quality assessment with JBI tool: risk of bias for each case series (i.e., series including at least five cases) included in the present systematic review.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | L | L | L | NR | NR | L | L | H | L | NR |
| ( | L | L | L | NR | NR | L | L | H | L | NR |
| ( | L | L | L | NR | NR | L | L | H | L | NR |
| ( | L | NR | NR | NR | NR | L | L | NR | L | NR |
Risk of bias was defined according to the below questions, being it defined as low (L), high (H), or not reported (NR).
Questions:
1. Were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series?
2. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series?
3. Were valid methods used for identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series?
4. Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants?
5. Did the case series have complete inclusion of participants?
6. Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study?
7. Was there clear reporting of clinical information of the participants?
8. Were the outcomes or follow-up results of cases clearly reported?
9. Was there clear reporting of the presenting sites’/clinics’ demographic information?
10. Was statistical analysis appropriate?