| Literature DB >> 35813591 |
Rocío Arias Del Razo1,2, Maria de Lourdes Velasco Vazquez3, Petru Turcanu1, Mathieu Legrand4,5, Allison R Lau1,2,6, Tamara A R Weinstein2, Leana R Goetze2, Karen L Bales1,2,7.
Abstract
In socially monogamous titi monkeys, involuntary separation from a pair mate can produce behavioral distress and increased cortisol production. The neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) is thought to play an important role in the separation response of pair-bonded species. Previous studies from our lab have shown that chronic intranasal oxytocin (IN OXT) during development can have long-term effects on adult social behavior. In the current study, we examined the chronic and acute effects of IN OXT or Saline (SAL) on the subjects' response to a brief separation from their pair mates. Subjects with a history of chronic IN OXT or SAL treatment during development received a single dose of OXT or SAL as adults 30 min before being separated from their pair mate. Chronic treatment consisted of a daily dose of IN OXT (0.8 IU/kg) or SAL (control) from 12 to 18 months of age. Subjects (N = 29) were introduced to a pair mate at 30 months of age. After the pairs had cohabitated for 5 months, pairs underwent two "Brief Separation" (OXT and SAL) and two "Non-Separation" (OXT and SAL) test sessions. Vocalizations and locomotion were measured as behavioral indices of agitation or distress during the Brief Separation and Non-Separation periods (30 min each). We collected blood samples after the Brief Separation and Non-Separation periods to measure cortisol levels. Our results showed subjects treated with chronic OXT had a reduction in long call and peep vocalizations compared to subjects treated with chronic SAL. Subjects treated with chronic SAL and acute OXT produced more peeps and long calls compared to animals treated with acute SAL; however, patterns in this response depended on sex. Cortisol and locomotion were significantly higher during the Brief Separation period compared to the Non-Separation period; however, we did not find any treatment or sex effects. We conclude that chronic IN OXT given during development blunts the separation response, while acute OXT in chronic SAL subjects had sexually dimorphic effects, which could reflect increased partner seeking behaviors in males and increased anxiety in females.Entities:
Keywords: contact; intranasal oxytocin; pair bonds; separation distress; vocalizations
Year: 2022 PMID: 35813591 PMCID: PMC9257099 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.877631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.617
Reunion ethogram for social behaviors.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Proximity | Subject’s body (excluding the tail) is within arm’s length (approximately 6 inches) of the partner (excluding the tail). |
| Contact | Subject and pair mate’s bodies are touching. |
| Tail twinning | Tails are intertwined at least one turn (score in addition to contact) |
| Grooming | The subject is grooming the pair mate (score in addition to contact) |
| Being groomed | The pair mate is grooming the subject (score in addition to contact) |
Figure 1(A) A representative spectrogram of a series of peeps, repetitive pulse-like vocalizations. (B) A representative spectrogram of a long call, wideband vocalizations with a prominent low-frequency component.
Figure 2Vocalizations: peeps. (A) OXT.OXT and OXT.SAL treated subjects vocalized less peeps than SAL.OXT subjects, SAL OXT subjects vocalized the most compared to other groups. (B) Females treated with OXT.OXT and OXT.SAL females vocalized less peeps than SAL. OXT females, SAL OXT females vocalized the most compared to all female groups. (C) Females treated with OXT.OXT or OXT.SAL had fewer peeps than females treated with SAL.OXT. Overall, SAL.OXT females vocalized the most peeps. (D) OXT.OXT males vocalized fewer peeps than OXT.SAL males. SAL.OXT males vocalized fewer peeps than SAL.SAL males. Significance summary: *p < 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Vocalizations. Peeps (number) and long call (duration) comparations by treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| OXT.OXT—OXT.SAL | 1.01 | 0.02 | 0.985 |
| OXT.OXT—SAL.OXT | 4.52 | 0.52 | 0.02* |
| OXT.OXT—SAL.SAL | 3.82 | 0.52 | 0.051 |
| OXT.SAL—SAL.OXT | 4.48 | 0.524 | 0.021* |
| OXT.SAL—SAL.SAL | 0.26 | 0.524 | 0.054 |
| SAL.OXT—SAL.SAL | 1.18 | 0.016 | <0.0001**** |
|
| |||
| OXT.OXT—OXT.SAL | 0.362 | 0.4163 | 0.0605 |
| OXT.OXT—SAL.OXT | 0.621 | 0.0764 | <0.0001**** |
| OXT.OXT—SAL.SAL | 5.930 | 0.5252 | <0.0001**** |
| OXT.SAL—SAL.OXT | 0.220 | 0.4172 | 0.0016*** |
| OXT.SAL—SAL.SAL | 3.688 | 0.5260 | <0.0001**** |
| SAL.OXT—SAL.SAL | 0.0268 | 0.3272 | 0.4460 |
Significance summary: .
Vocalizations: peeps and long calls pairwise comparations by sex and treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Females OXT.OXT—Females OXT.SAL | 0.047 | 0.045 | 0.965 |
| Females OXT.OXT—Females SAL.OXT | 0.840 | 0.745 | 0.02* |
| Females OXT.OXT—Females SAL.SAL | 0.14 | 0.745 | 0.145 |
| Females OXT.SAL—Females SAL.OXT | 2.225 | 0.745 | 0.01** |
| Females OXT.SAL—Females SAL.SAL | 0.134 | 0.745 | 0.124 |
| Females SAL.OXT—Females SAL.SAL | 1.67 | 1.025 | <0.0001**** |
|
| |||
| Males OXT.OXT—Males OXT.SAL | 0.937 | 1.021 | 0.04* |
| Males OXT.OXT—Males SAL.OXT | 0.581 | 0.737 | 0.995 |
| Males OXT.OXT—Males SAL.SAL | −0.721 | 0.737 | 0.977 |
| Males OXT.SAL—Males SAL.OXT | −0.477 | 0.737 | 0.998 |
| Males OXT.SAL—Males SAL.SAL | −0.657 | 0.737 | 0.987 |
| Males SAL.OXT—Males SAL.SAL | 0.836 | 1.021 | <0.0001**** |
|
| |||
| Females OXT.OXT—Females OXT.SAL | 0.0197 | 0.140 | 0.903 |
| Females OXT.OXT—Females SAL.OXT | 0.0294 | 0.628 | 0.516 |
| Females OXT.OXT—Females SAL.SAL | 0.721 | 0.897 | 0.054 |
| Females OXT.SAL—Females SAL.OXT | 0.246 | 0.629 | 0.333 |
| Females OXT.SAL—Females SAL.SAL | 0.131 | 0.898 | 0.08 |
| Females SAL.OXT—Females SAL.SAL | 0.067 | 0.574 | 0.545 |
|
| |||
| Males OXT.OXT—Males OXT.SAL | 0.125 | 0.062 | 0.5733 |
| Males OXT.OXT—Males SAL.OXT | 0.003 | 0.546 | 0.7733 |
| Males OXT.OXT—Males SAL.SAL | 0.097 | 0.546 | 0.3606 |
| Males OXT.SAL—Males SAL.OXT | 0.410 | 0.547 | 0.008** |
| Males OXT.SAL—Males SAL.SAL | 0.1349 | 0.547 | 0.06 |
| Males SAL.OXT—Males SAL.SAL | 0.712 | 0.045 | <0.0001**** |
Significance summary: .
Figure 3Vocalizations: long calls. (A) Subjects from chronic OXT treatment groups (OXT.OXT and OXT.SAL) had a shorter duration of long calls than subjects from chronic SAL treatment groups (SAL.OXT and SAL.SAL). (B) Males had longer long call durations than females. (C) Non-significant trend for OXT. OXT females have shorter long calls than SAL.SAL females. (D) Males treated with SAL. OXT had a longer duration of long calls than males treated with OXT.SAL and SAL.SAL. Significance summary: **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 4Contact during reunion. Subjects treated with chronic OXT and acute OXT spent less time in contact with their pair mate following reunion compared to subjects that received chronic OXT and acute SAL. Significance summary: *p < 0.05.
Figure 5Active contact during reunion. (A) Subjects treated OXT.OXT displayed less active contact behaviors compared to subjects that received OXT.SAL. (B) Males displayed more active contact than females. (C) All the treatment groups displayed significantly less active contact during the brief Separation condition compared to the Non-Separation, except SAL.SAL. Following a Non-Separation, acute OXT in animals treated with chronic SAL increased active contact compared to acute SAL. In animals treated with chronic OXT, acute OXT decreased active contact compared to acute SAL. (D) Males displayed more active contact during the Non-Separation Condition compared to the Separation condition and compared to females in the Non-Separation Condition. Significance summary: ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.