| Literature DB >> 35813498 |
Panagiotis Christidis1, Theofanis Kantas1, Christos Kalitsis1, Sampria Georgia Frechat1, Georgios Biniaris1, Nikolaos Gougoulias1.
Abstract
Femoral neck fractures in transfemoral amputees are not common and management is associated with surgical technique and post-operative rehabilitation challenges. A 61-year-old Caucasian, male, above-knee amputee (following mangled extremity trauma 8 months before) who mobilized with a prosthesis presented to the emergency department with a right femoral neck fracture (Garden III). The patient underwent cementless total hip replacement (THR), using the lateral (Hardinge's) approach. No additional instrument was used to manipulate the residual femoral stump. The absence of the distal limb required careful preparation of the femoral canal, taking into consideration the position of the lesser trochanter, in order to appropriately align the femoral prosthesis regarding anteversion. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Six months later, the patient was ambulating using his prothesis and had almost returned to his pre-injury activity status. Satisfactory results can be obtained after THR in trans-femoral amputees.Entities:
Keywords: above-knee amputation; femoral neck fracture; intracapsular femoral fracture; subcapital femoral fracture; total hip arthroplasty; total hip replacement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35813498 PMCID: PMC9262082 DOI: 10.22551/2022.35.0902.10203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Clin Cases ISSN: 2360-6975
Fig. 1A Garden III femoral neck fracture
Fig. 2At the most recent follow up at six months, there was no evidence of surgical site infection or wound dehiscence
Fig. 3Postoperative radiograph six months after the operation
Fig. 4Postoperative radiograph at 6 months. No osteolysis and a well incorporated prosthesis was noted
Peri-operative characteristics of patients with above-knee amputation and femoral neck fracture
| Study | Age (years) | Gender | Interval | Method of traction/manipulation | Approach | Operation | F-u (mo) | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kandel et al. 2009 [ | 68 | M | 58 y | bone holder in the subtrochanteric area | posterior | bipolar HA | 60 | No restrictions |
| Ma et al. 2015 [ | 67 | M | 47 y | Steimann pin on greater trochanter | posterior | cementless THA | 24 | No restrictions |
| Boussakri et al. 2015 [ | 81 | M | 11 y | bone holder in the subtrochanteric area | anterolateral | bipolar HA | 30 | No restrictions |
| Patnaik et al. 2017 [ | 30 | M | 3 mo | bone clamp below the lesser trochanteric area | MIS anterolateral | cementless THA | 12 | No restrictions |
| Perumal et al. 2017 [ | 75 | M | same event | two Schantz Pin in distal fragment perpendicular to each other | anterolateral | bipolar HA | 14 | No restrictions |
| Present study | 61 | M | 8 mo | - | anterolateral | cementless THA | 6 | Minimal restrictions |
Abbreviations: y: years; f-u: follow-up; mo: months; M: male; MIS: minimal invasive surgery; HA: hemi-arthroplasty; THA: total hip arthroplasty