| Literature DB >> 35812906 |
Yanbin Wen1,2, Hongjiu Liu1, Huanwen Meng1, Lijun Qiao1, Guoqing Zhang3, Zhihui Cheng1.
Abstract
Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is a compelling horticultural crop with high culinary and therapeutic values. Commercial garlic varieties are male-sterile and propagated asexually from individual cloves or bulbils. Consequently, its main breeding strategy has been confined to the time-consuming and inefficient selection approach from the existing germplasm. Polyploidy, meanwhile, plays a prominent role in conferring plants various changes in morphological, physiological, and ecological properties. Artificial polyploidy induction has gained pivotal attention to generate new genotype for further crop improvement as a mutational breeding method. In our study, efficient and reliable in vitro induction protocols of autotetraploid garlic were established by applying different antimitotic agents based on high-frequency direct shoot organogenesis initiated from inflorescence explant. The explants were cultured on solid medium containing various concentrations of colchicine or oryzalin for different duration days. Afterward, the ploidy levels of regenerated plantlets with stable and distinguished characters were confirmed by flow cytometry and chromosome counting. The colchicine concentration at 0.2% (w/v) combined with culture duration for 20 days was most efficient (the autotetraploid induction rate was 21.8%) compared to the induction rate of 4.3% using oryzalin at 60 μmol L-1 for 20 days. No polymorphic bands were detected by simple sequence repeat analysis between tetraploid and diploid plantlets. The tetraploids exhibited a stable and remarkable dwarfness effect rarely reported in artificial polyploidization among wide range of phenotypic variations. There are both morphological and cytological changes including extremely reduced plant height, thickening and broadening of leaves, disappearance of pseudostem, density reduction, and augmented width of stomatal. Furthermore, the level of phytohormones, including, indole propionic acid, gibberellin, brassinolide, zeatin, dihydrozeatin, and methyl jasmonate, was significantly lower in tetraploids than those in diploid controls, except indole acetic acid and abscisic acid, which could partly explain the dwarfness in hormonal regulation aspect. Moreover, as the typical secondary metabolites of garlic, organosulfur compounds including allicin, diallyl disulfide, and diallyl trisulfide accumulated a higher content significantly in tetraploids. The obtained dwarf genotype of autotetraploid garlic could bring new perspectives for the artificial polyploids breeding and be implemented as a new germplasm to facilitate investigation into whole-genome doubling consequences.Entities:
Keywords: autopolyploid; colchicine; dwarfness; garlic; in vitro; oryzalin; whole-genome duplication
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812906 PMCID: PMC9258943 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.917910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Main effect of colchicine concentration and duration on viability of explants, shoot regeneration, and tetraploid induction rate from garlic inflorescence on solid medium.
| Treatment | Viability (%) | Shoots/per explant | Tetraploid (%) |
|
| |||
| 5 | 88.9 ± 2.9a | 9.3 ± 1.2a | 0.1 ± 0.5d |
| 10 | 74.6 ± 4b | 5.5 ± 0.9b | 3.7 ± 2bc |
| 15 | 60 ± 4.3c | 4.2 ± 0.9c | 6.2 ± 2.1bc |
| 20 | 54.7 ± 3d | 2.9 ± 0.7d | 9.9 ± 2.7a |
| 25 | 20.4 ± 3.1e | 2.4 ± 1e | 7.4 ± 2.4ab |
| 30 | 7.3 ± 2.8f | 0.9 ± 0.9f | 2.8 ± 2.5c |
|
| |||
| 125 | 62.5 ± 5.5a | 5.1 ± 1.8a | 3.7 ± 2.3b |
| 250 | 57.7 ± 5.5b | 4.3 ± 1.6b | 2.9 ± 2b |
| 500 | 55.2 ± 5.8b | 4.3 ± 1.7b | 4.7 ± 2.2b |
| 1000 | 44.7 ± 5.5c | 3.9 ± 1.7bc | 5.5 ± 2.2b |
| 2000 | 34.7 ± 5.1d | 3.5 ± 1.6c | 8.2 ± 3a |
|
| |||
| Duration |
|
|
|
| Conc. |
|
|
|
Data with different letters in the same column indicate significant difference between means at the 5% probability level by LSD. *Indicates significant difference at 0.05 level (ANOVA and LSD’s multiple range test). **Indicates significant difference at 0.01 level (Two-directional ANOVA and LSD’s multiple range test).
Interaction effect of colchicine concentration and duration on viability of explants, shoot regeneration, and tetraploid induction rate from garlic inflorescence on solid medium.
| Treatment | viability (%) | Shoots/per explant | Tetraploid (%) | |
| Duration (d) | Concentration (mg L–1) | |||
| 0 | 0 | 100 ± 0 | 23.4 ± 1.4 | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 125 | 96.5 ± 1.7 | 11.3 ± 1.2 | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 250 | 95.2 ± 2.6 | 8.5 ± 0.9 | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 500 | 91.9 ± 2.7 | 9.5 ± 0.8 | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 1,000 | 85.3 ± 2.1 | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 2,000 | 77.1 ± 2.2 | 7.9 ± 0.8 | 0.3 ± 0.7 |
| 10 | 125 | 91.7 ± 2.8 | 6.5 ± 1 | 0 ± 0 |
| 10 | 250 | 81.7 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 0 ± 0 |
| 10 | 500 | 86.8 ± 2.8 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 1.7 |
| 10 | 1,000 | 67.2 ± 3.1 | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 5.9 ± 1.4 |
| 10 | 2,000 | 45.5 ± 3.1 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 9.2 ± 1 |
| 15 | 125 | 74.1 ± 2 | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.4 |
| 15 | 250 | 69.7 ± 2.6 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 1 |
| 15 | 500 | 72.8 ± 2 | 4 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 1 |
| 15 | 1,000 | 53.4 ± 2.2 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 10.2 ± 1 |
| 15 | 2,000 | 29.9 ± 3.4 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 11.3 ± 2 |
| 20 | 125 | 63.3 ± 2.4 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.7 |
| 20 | 250 | 62.2 ± 2.1 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 4.7 ± 1.4 |
| 20 | 500 | 55.5 ± 2.5 | 3 ± 0.5 | 10.6 ± 1.8 |
| 20 | 1,000 | 47.8 ± 2.5 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 10 ± 0.6 |
| 20 | 2,000 | 44.6 ± 1.2 | 3 ± 0.5 | 21.8 ± 2.1 |
| 25 | 125 | 31.2 ± 1.8 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 7.5 ± 1.4 |
| 25 | 250 | 28.6 ± 1.2 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 5.7 ± 2.4 |
| 25 | 500 | 18.4 ± 1.4 | 3.2 ± 1 | 10.4 ± 1.3 |
| 25 | 1,000 | 13.1 ± 3.5 | 1.7 ± 1.2 | 6.7 ± 2.4 |
| 25 | 2,000 | 11 ± 1.7 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 6.7 ± 3.4 |
| 30 | 125 | 18.3 ± 2.4 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 10 ± 3.2 |
| 30 | 250 | 10.6 ± 2.4 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 4.2 ± 2.7 |
| 30 | 500 | 6 ± 2.3 | 0.8 ± 0.9 | 0 ± 0 |
| 30 | 1,000 | 1.4 ± 1.6 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 0 ± 0 |
| 30 | 2,000 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Duration × Conc. |
| NS |
| |
Data with different letters in the same column indicate significant difference between means at the 5% probability level by LSD. **Indicates significant difference at 0.01 level (Two-directional ANOVA and LSD’s multiple range test).
Main effect of oryzalin concentration and duration on viability of explants, shoot regeneration, and tetraploid induction rate from garlic inflorescence on solid medium.
| Treatment | Viability (%) | Shoots/per explant | Tetraploid (%) |
|
| |||
| 5 | 97a | 18.4a | 0.2d |
| 10 | 91.7ab | 15.8b | 1.5c |
| 15 | 87.7c | 15.1b | 2.1bc |
| 20 | 78.3d | 13.9c | 3.2a |
| 25 | 65.5e | 9.5d | 2.7ab |
| 30 | 46.3f | 8.2e | 1.8bc |
|
| |||
| 15 | 85.6a | 15.6a | 1.7a |
| 30 | 83.1a | 14.9a | 1.8a |
| 60 | 76.5b | 14.6a | 2.2a |
| 120 | 74.2bc | 11.7b | 2.1a |
| 240 | 69.4c | 10.5c | 1.7a |
|
| |||
| Duration |
|
|
|
| Conc. |
|
| NS |
Data with different letters in the same column indicate significant difference between means at the 5% probability level by LSD. **Indicates significant difference at 0.01 level (Two-directional ANOVA and LSD’s multiple range test).
Interaction effect of oryzalin concentration and duration on viability of explants, shoot regeneration, and tetraploid induction rate from garlic inflorescence on solid medium.
| Duration | Concentration | Viability (%) | Average Shoots/per explant | Tetraploid (%) |
| 0 | 0 | 100 ± 0 | 23.4 ± 1.4 | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 15 | 100 ± 0 | 19.5 ± 1.1 | 0.0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 30 | 98.3 ± 1.7 | 18.8 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0 |
| 5 | 60 | 96.7 ± 1.7 | 18.4 ± 1.0 | 0.3 ± 0.3 |
| 5 | 120 | 95.0 ± 2.9 | 18.3 ± 0.6 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| 5 | 240 | 95.0 ± 2.9 | 17.1 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.3 |
| 10 | 15 | 96.7 ± 1.7 | 18.2 ± 0.6 | 0.8 ± 0.5 |
| 10 | 30 | 96.7 ± 1.7 | 15.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.5 |
| 10 | 60 | 91.7 ± 4.4 | 18.4 ± 1.7 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| 10 | 120 | 88.3 ± 4.4 | 13.5 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.8 |
| 10 | 240 | 85.0 ± 2.9 | 13.2 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 0 |
| 15 | 15 | 93.3 ± 4.4 | 15.5 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.7 |
| 15 | 30 | 91.7 ± 4.4 | 16.7 ± 1.4 | 1.6 ± 0.5 |
| 15 | 60 | 86.7 ± 1.7 | 17.4 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ± 0.4 |
| 15 | 120 | 86.7 ± 3.3 | 13.2 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 0.6 |
| 15 | 240 | 80.0 ± 2.9 | 12.6 ± 1.0 | 2.5 ± 0.7 |
| 20 | 15 | 78.3 ± 1.7 | 15.7 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.7 |
| 20 | 30 | 80.0 ± 0 | 16.1 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.3 |
| 20 | 60 | 81.7 ± 4.4 | 16.1 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.4 |
| 20 | 120 | 78.3 ± 3.3 | 11.1 ± 1.1 | 3.4 ± 1.1 |
| 20 | 240 | 73.3 ± 1.7 | 10.5 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 1.1 |
| 25 | 15 | 73.3 ± 1.7 | 13.1 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.3 |
| 25 | 30 | 73.3 ± 1.7 | 11.9 ± 0.8 | 3.4 ± 1.4 |
| 25 | 60 | 75.0 ± 5.8 | 9.1 ± 1.1 | 3.2 ± 0.9 |
| 25 | 120 | 68.3 ± 4.4 | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 0.7 |
| 25 | 240 | 61.7 ± 3.3 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 0.9 |
| 30 | 15 | 71.7 ± 6.0 | 11.8 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 0.7 |
| 30 | 30 | 58.3 ± 4.4 | 10.2 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 1.2 |
| 30 | 60 | 51.7 ± 1.7 | 8.5 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 1.3 |
| 30 | 120 | 28.3 ± 3.3 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.9 |
| 30 | 240 | 21.7 ± 3.3 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 0 |
| Duration × Conc. |
|
| NS | |
Data with different letters in the same column indicate significant difference between means at the 5% probability level by LSD. *Indicates significant difference at 0.05 level (ANOVA and LSD’s multiple range test).
FIGURE 1Linea histograms of the relative fluorescence intensity of garlic with FCM. (A) Diploid (2n = 2x = 16). (B) Putative tetraploid (2n = 2x = 32).
FIGURE 2Observation and validation of root tip chromosomes in regenerated plantlets. (A,C) Diploid garlic (2n = 2x = 16). (B,D) Tetraploid garlic (2n = 2x = 32).
FIGURE 3SSR banding pattern in the tetraploid and diploid garlic plantlets by 29 primers. Lane 0: marker, odd lane: diploid garlic, even lane: tetraploid garlic.
FIGURE 4Comparison of plant architecture and growth characteristics of diploid and tetraploid in different regeneration stages. (A) Developed tetraploid (left) and diploid (right) plantlet. (B) Newly regenerated tetraploid (left) and diploid (right) shoots.
Morphological characteristics of diploid and tetraploid garlic.
| Morphological characteristics | Leaf length (mm) | Leaf width (mm) | Leaf index | Leaf thickness (mm) | Root length (mm) |
| Diploid | 50.9 ± 6.2 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 14.9 ± 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 112.0 ± 2.3 |
| Tetraploid | 18.2 ± 1.2 | 8.4 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 71.4 ± 3.4 |
Data are presented as mean ± SE. Data with **Indicate significant difference at 0.01 level by one-directional ANOVA and Student’s t-test.
FIGURE 5Cryo-scanning electron micrographs of stomata. (A) Diploid garlic. (B) Tetraploid garlic.
Characteristics of stomatal apparatus in diploid and tetraploid garlic plantlets.
| Ploidy level | Length (μm) | Width (μm) | Area (μm2) | Density (mm2) |
| Diploid | 35.2 ± 3.2 | 12.2 ± 1.7 | 324.7 ± 50.2 | 1.30E-04 |
| Tetraploid | 35.3 ± 4.2 | 17.4 ± 3.0 | 497.1 ± 109.2 | 4.55E-05 |
Data are presented as mean ± SE. **Indicates significant difference at 0.01 level by one-directional ANOVA and Student’s t-test.
FIGURE 6Comparison of physiological compounds. (A) Soluble sugar. (B) Reducing sugar. (C) Soluble protein.
FIGURE 7Comparison of sulfur-containing compounds. (A) Allicin, (B) DADS. (C) DATS.
FIGURE 8Comparison of endogenous hormone levels. (A) Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). (B) Isopentenyladenosine (IPA). (C) Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA). (D) Gibberellins (GA3) (E) Gibberellins (GA4). (F) Brassinosteroid (BR). (G) Zeatin (ZT). (H) Dihydrozeatin (DHZT). (I) Abscisic acid (ABA).