| Literature DB >> 35812835 |
José Elias Angulo-Cervera1, Mario Piedrahita-Bello1, Baptiste Martin1, Seyed Ehsan Alavi1, William Nicolazzi1, Lionel Salmon1, Gábor Molnár1, Azzedine Bousseksou1.
Abstract
Polymer composites of molecular spin crossover complexes have emerged as promising mechanical actuator materials, but their effective thermomechanical properties remain elusive. In this work, we investigated a series of iron(ii)-triazole@P(VDF-TrFE) particulate composites using a tensile testing stage with temperature control. From these measurements, we assessed the temperature dependence of the Young's modulus as well as the free deformation and blocking stress, associated with the thermally-induced spin transition. The results denote that the expansion of the particles at the spin transition is effectively transferred to the macroscopic composite material, providing ca. 1-3% axial strain for 25% particle load. This strain is in excess of the 'neat' particle strain, which we attribute to particle-matrix mechanical coupling. On the other hand, the blocking stress (∼1 MPa) appears reduced by the softening of the composite around the spin transition temperature. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812835 PMCID: PMC9207597 DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00459c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Adv ISSN: 2633-5409
Fig. 1(a) Structure of the copolymer P(VDF-TrFE), (b) scheme of the iron(ii)-triazole chain and (c) photo of a dog-bone-shaped sample (pink) clamped in the tensile stage.
Fig. 2Representative TEM images showing the typical particle morphologies of sample 1 (a) and 4 (b), and representative SEM images showing the cross-sections of composites 1C (c) and 4C (d).
Composition, morphology and spin transition temperatures on heating (T1/2↑) and cooling (T1/2↓) of the different composites. (For each sample, the second thermal cycle is tabulated from the DSC data, because the first cycle is often anomalous)
| Sample | Particle composition | Particle shape | Particle mean size (nm) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1C | [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF4) | Irregular | ∼50 nm | 97 | 69 |
| 2C | [Fe(Htrz)2.1(trz)0.8(NH2trz)0.1](BF4)1.2 | Irregular | ∼50 nm | 82 | 59 |
| 3C | [Fe(Htrz)2.05(trz)0.75(NH2trz)0.2](BF4)1.25 | Irregular | ∼50 nm | 75 | 58 |
| 4C | [Fe(NH2trz)3](SO4) | Rod | 2 μm (length) | 64 | 55 |
| 0.3 μm (width) |
Fig. 3Representative thermomechanical behavior of composite 3C. Heating/cooling are shown by red/blue colors. (a) Stress–strain curve at room temperature. The straight line is a linear least-squares fit. (b) Young's modulus at selected temperatures. The dashed line is a guide to the eye. (c) Thermal expansion under a constant tensile force of 0.5 N. The SCO-induced expansion is shown by an arrow. (d) Thermal stress for a constant tensile strain of 0.24%. The blocking stress associated with the SCO is shown by an arrow.
Young's moduli at selected temperatures, thermal expansion coefficients, free expansion and blocking stress associated with the SCO for the composite samples and the pure copolymer
| Sample |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P(VDF-TrFE) | 4.3 | 1.1 | 470 | N/A | ||||
| 1C | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 330 | 230 | 2600 | 2.8 | >1 |
| 2C | 4.4 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 370 | 260 | 2700 | 2.2 | >1.8 |
| 3C | 3.8 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 270 | 290 | 2500 | 1.9 | 0.7 |
| 4C | 3.4 | 1.5* | 1.0* | 220 | 190 | 1500 | 1.1 | 0.4 |