Literature DB >> 35812811

Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.

Kaiwen Man1, Jeffrey R Harring2, Peida Zhan3.   

Abstract

Recently, joint models of item response data and response times have been proposed to better assess and understand test takers' learning processes. This article demonstrates how biometric information such as gaze fixation counts obtained from an eye-tracking machine can be integrated into the measurement model. The proposed joint modeling framework accommodates the relations among a test taker's latent ability, working speed and test engagement level via a person-side variance-covariance structure, while simultaneously permitting the modeling of item difficulty, time-intensity, and the engagement intensity through an item-side variance-covariance structure. A Bayesian estimation scheme is used to fit the proposed model to data. Posterior predictive model checking based on three discrepancy measures corresponding to various model components are introduced to assess model-data fit. Findings from a Monte Carlo simulation and results from analyzing experimental data demonstrate the utility of the model.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye-tracking; gaze-fixation counts; item response theory; joint modeling; response times; technology enhanced assessment

Year:  2022        PMID: 35812811      PMCID: PMC9265489          DOI: 10.1177/01466216221089344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  19 in total

1.  Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.

Authors:  Rinke H Klein Entink; Jörg-Tobias Kuhn; Lutz F Hornke; Jean-Paul Fox
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-03

2.  Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.

Authors:  Maria Bolsinova; Paul de Boeck; Jesper Tijmstra
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Spontaneous and imposed speed of cognitive test responses.

Authors:  Paul De Boeck; Haiqin Chen; Mark Davison
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.

Authors:  Peter W van Rijn; Usama S Ali
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.

Authors:  Kaiwen Man; Jeffrey R Harring; Hong Jiao; Peida Zhan
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-22

6.  Pupillography as an objective indicator of fatigue.

Authors:  Y Morad; H Lemberg; N Yofe; Y Dagan
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Compensatory and non-compensatory multidimensional randomized item response models.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Fox; Rinke Klein Entink; Marianna Avetisyan
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Assessing Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Multiple-Group Analysis of Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.

Authors:  Kaiwen Man; Jeffrey R Harring
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.088

9.  How Do Test Takers Interact With Simulation-Based Tasks? A Response-Time Perspective.

Authors:  Yi-Hsuan Lee; Jiangang Hao; Kaiwen Man; Lu Ou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.