| Literature DB >> 35812677 |
Shan-Ji Li1, Min-Hua Yu1, Jie Cheng2, Wen-Xin Bai3, Wen Di4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a rare but important complication of ovarian teratoma. Between July 2012 and December 2019, six patients with ovarian teratoma-associated anti-NMDAR encephalitis were enrolled in our hospital and their clinical characteristics, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. We also conducted a systematic literature review of ovarian teratoma related anti-NMDAR encephalitis reports between January 2014 and December 2019. AIM: To better understand anti-NMDAR encephalitis through literature review and patients enrolled in our hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis; Immunotherapy; Ovarian teratoma; Surgery
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812677 PMCID: PMC9210914 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.534
Figure 1Consort flow diagram showing search strategies, and articles searched and excluded along with reasons for exclusion. NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.
Figure 2Representative brain tissue pathology from one of the six patients.
Year of publication and country of study of patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis and ovarian teratoma
|
| |
| Year of publication (No. of papers) |
|
| 2014 (17) | 22 (14.2) |
| 2015 (19) | 20 (12.9) |
| 2016 (28) | 31 (20.0) |
| 2017 (32) | 38 (24.5) |
| 2018 (17) | 18 (11.6) |
| 2019 (17) | 26 (16.8) |
| Total (130) | 155 (100.0) |
| Country of birth or study |
|
| Asia: Japan-28; China-26; Korea-5; India-5; Taiwan-3; Thailand-2; Malaysia-1; Saudi Arabia-1; Israel-1 | 72 (46.5) |
| Australia: 5 | 5 (3.2) |
| Europe: Spain-12; United Kingdom-6; Italy-3; Netherlands-3; Poland-2; Russia-2; Germany-1; France-1; Hungary-1; Ireland-1; Croatia-1; Turkey-1; Espana-1; Romania-1; Osterreich-1 | 37 (23.9) |
| North-America: United States-36; Canada-3; Mexico-1 | 40 (25.8) |
| South-America: Ecuador-1 | 1 (0.6) |
| Total | 155 (100) |
Age of patients, histological type of ovarian teratoma, laterality of the affected ovary, and tumor size
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age ( | 130 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 155 |
| mean ± SD | 25.1 ± 8.3 | 24.8 ± 7.1 | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 25.2 ± 8.0 | 25.0 ± 8.0 |
| Median (min-max) | 25 (7-73) | 25 (9-38) | 23 (23-23) | 25 (14-36) | 25 (7-73) |
| Tumor location | |||||
| Right ovary | 56 (88.9) | 6 (9.5) | 0 | 1 (1.6) | 63 |
| Left ovary | 38 (86.4) | 6 (13.6) | 0 | 0 | 44 |
| Bilateral | 18 (85.7) | 0 | 2 (9.5) | 1 (4.8) | 21 |
| Not marked | 18 (66.7) | 2 (7.4.) | 0 | 7 (25.9) | 27 |
| Total | |||||
| Teratoma size (cm) | |||||
| mean ± SD ( | 3.3 ± 2.4 (65) | 10.2 ± 3.9 (10) | 3.5 ± 1.3 (2) | - | 4.1 ± 3.3 (77) |
| Median (min-max) | 3.4 (0.4-13) | 10.2 (2.5-17) | 3.5 (2.4-4.9) | - | 5.7 (0.4-17) |
Figure 3Prodrome symptoms. A: Pie chart showing distribution of prodrome symptoms; B: Scatter plot and bar graph depicting mean time from prodrome to psychosis.
Figure 4Major symptoms. A: Pie chart sowing distribution of clinical symptoms: B: Bar graph showing abundance of various psychosomatic behavioral symptoms; C: Pie chart depicting number of symptoms reported.
Figure 5Examinations and treatment. A: Bar graph showing results from patient examinations; B: Bar graph showing results from antibody testing; C: Venn diagram showing treatment combinations. EEG: Electroencephalography; CSF: Colony-stimulating factor; OCB: Oligoclonal bands.
Surgery and outcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Full recovery | 37 | 27 | 7 | ||
| Mild deficits | 18 | 9 | 1 | ||
| Severe deficits | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Death | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||
| Not specified | 11 | 29 | 6 |