| Literature DB >> 35812534 |
Sudeep Jena1, Pratikhya Sarangi1, Upendra K Das2, Andrew A Lamare1, Roma Rattan3,1.
Abstract
Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been recognized as a global health problem. Progression of CKD to advanced stages is associated with a significant increase in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). An antiaging protein, α-Klotho, is found expressed in the distal convoluted tubules of the kidney where, predominantly, it works to increase calcium absorption and potassium excretion in distal tubule via N-linked glycans. The association of serum α-Klotho with oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis, as seen in CKD, highlights its importance for studying disease prognosis with declining glomerular function rate (GFR). Material and methods This was a case-control study consisting of 90 subjects. Fifty diagnosed cases of CKD attending the department of nephrology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, were included, and 40 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers were taken as control. Serum α-Klotho levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Oxidative stress by estimating the total oxidant load by ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange version 2 (FOX2) method and the total antioxidant capacity of serum by the ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) method. Estimation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was done using the Cockcroft and Gault equation. Results Serum α-Klotho (ng/ml) was found to be 2.59±0.98 in cases as compared to 0.24±0.09 in controls (p< 0.01). The serum total oxidant load (ng/ml) was 1.96±1.01 and 0.05±0.02 in cases and controls, respectively. Serum total antioxidant capacity (µM) was measured as 281.80±78.0 in cases and 862.82±51.86 in controls. (p< 0.01). Serum Klotho has a negative correlation with eGFR in CKD patients (r = -0.065; p = 0.648). Conclusion The serum α-Klotho level was significantly higher in CKD patients than in healthy volunteers. Both serum α-Klotho and oxidative stress were negatively correlated with eGFR in CKD patients. Serum α-Klotho can be a suitable biomarker in CKD patients with declining GFR.Entities:
Keywords: chronic kidney disease; glomerular function rate; inflammatory marker; reactive oxygen species; α-klotho
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812534 PMCID: PMC9268485 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study population
CKD: chronic kidney disease
| INCLUSION CRITERIA | EXCLUSION CRITERIA |
| 1) Clinically diagnosed cases of chronic kidney disease with diabetes mellitus | 1) Patients with any endocrine disorder other than diabetes |
| 2) Clinically diagnosed cases of chronic kidney disease with hypertension | 2) Chronic smoker |
| 3) Clinically diagnosed cases of idiopathic chronic kidney disease | 3) Chronic alcoholic |
| 4) CKD patients on dialysis | 4) Presence of any autoimmune disorder |
Comparison of demographics, anthropometric parameters, and vitals among study participants
* p-value ≤ 0.05: significant
CKD: chronic kidney disease
| Parameters | Cases (n=50) (CKD patients) | Controls (n=40) (Healthy volunteers) | p-value | |
| Age (years) | 48.72±10.98 | 42.60±11.08 | 0.011* | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 38(76%) | 15(37.5%) | < 0.01* | |
| Female | 12(24%) | 25(62.5%) | ||
| Anthropometry | ||||
| Weight (kg) | 65.98±10.07 | 60.22±7.20 | 0.003* | |
| Height (meters) | 1.55±0.09 | 1.54±0.08 | 0.532 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27.23±4.19 | 25.11±1.95 | 0.004* | |
| Vitals | ||||
| Pulse (per minute) | 76 ± 5.48 | 74.75 ± 5.53 | 0.121 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 120 ± 6.96 | 116.45 ± 5.62 | 0.002* | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 81 ± 4.31 | 79.70 ± 3.91 | 0.083 | |
Comparison of biochemical parameters among the study population
* p-value ≤ 0.05: significant
| Parameters | Cases (n=50) | Controls (n=40) | p-value |
| Serum fasting blood sugar (mg/dl) | 132.28±44.76 | 96.62±8.61 | < 0.01* |
| Renal Function Tests | |||
| Serum Urea (mg/dl) | 132.58±53.04 | 20.77±5.64 | < 0.01* |
| Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) | 10.31±4.25 | 0.82±0.19 | < 0.01* |
| Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min) | 9.58±6.01 | 95.37±30.37 | < 0.01* |
| Electrolytes | |||
| Serum Sodium (mmol/l) | 121.26±9.21 | 137.77±4.66 | < 0.01* |
| Serum Potassium (mmol/l) | 1.95±0.54 | 4.05±0.49 | < 0.01* |
| Serum Calcium (mmol/l) | 0.65±0.26 | 1.22±0.09 | < 0.01* |
| Serum Total Protein (gm/dl) | 3.48±0.47 | 5.95±0.81 | < 0.01* |
Comparison of special parameters among study participants
* p-value ≤ 0.05: significant
| Parameters | Cases (n=50) | Controls (n=40) | p-value |
| Serum α-Klotho (ng/ml) | 2.59±0.98 | 0.24±0.09 | < 0.01* |
| Serum total oxidant load (ng/ml) | 1.96±1.01 | 0.05±0.02 | < 0.01* |
| Serum total antioxidant capacity (µM) | 281.80±78.0 | 862.82±51.86 | < 0.01* |
Correlation of serum Klotho with anthropometric and biochemical parameters among the study population
* p-value ≤ 0.05: significant; r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient
| Parameters | Cases (n=50) | Controls (n=40) | ||
| r value | p-value | r value | p-value | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 0.109 | 0.737 | -0.096 | 0.385 |
| Pulse (per minute) | 0.021 | 0.692 | -0.198 | 0.611 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.117 | 0.452 | -0.112 | 0.490 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.122 | 0.998 | -0.043 | 0.337 |
| Serum fasting blood sugar (mg/dl) | 0.352 | 0.012* | -0.210 | 0.388 |
| Serum urea (mg/dl) | 0.132 | 0.227 | 0.018 | 0.106 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.106 | 0.744 | -0.100 | 0.529 |
| Serum sodium (mmol/l) | 0.104 | 0.830 | -0.234 | 0.033* |
| Serum potassium (mmol/l) | -0.021 | 0.632 | 0.317 | 0.265 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/l) | 0.076 | 0.224 | 0.162 | 0.441 |
| Serum total protein (gm/dl) | 0.188 | 0.190 | 0.380 | 0.016* |
Correlation of eGFR with serum Klotho and oxidative stress among the study population
* p-value ≤ 0.05: significant; r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate
| Parameters | Cases (n=50) | Controls (n=40) | ||
| r value | p-value | r value | p-value | |
| Serum Klotho (ng/ml) | -0.065 | 0.648 | 0.064 | 0.741 |
| Serum total oxidant load (ng/ml) | 0.020 | 0.101 | -0.081 | 0.175 |
| Serum total antioxidant capacity (µM) | 0.133 | 0.702 | -0.051 | 0.004* |
Linear regression of serum Klotho and oxidative stress with eGFR among study participants
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate
| Coefficient | Cases (n=50) | 95% Confidence Interval (CI) | Controls (n=40) | 95% Confidence Interval (CI) |
| Serum Klotho (ng/ml) | -0.070 | -2.231 – 1.378 | 0.063 | -0.920 – 1.264 |
| Serum total oxidant load (ng/ml) | -0.098 | -2.348 – 1.193 | -0.020 | -1.030 – 1.394 |
| Serum total antioxidant capacity (µM) | 0.044 | -0.020 – 0.026 | 0.082 | -0.040 – 0.046 |
Figure 1Linear regression analysis between eGFR (in ml/min) and serum Klotho (ng/ml)
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate
Figure 2Linear regression analysis between eGFR (ml/min) and serum total oxidant load (FOX) (ng/ml)
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; FOX: ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange
Figure 3Linear regression analysis between eGFR (in ml/min) and serum total antioxidant capacity (FRAP) (in µM)
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power