| Literature DB >> 35812494 |
Jiang Yu1.
Abstract
Present study has aimed to understand the intervention and prevention of the mental health crisis of college students. For this purpose, this study has checked the effect of trust in wellbeing information on preventive behavior and mental wellbeing. The target population taken for this study is the students of colleges situated in Mainland in China. The data was collected from the 458 students of the college. Smart PLS has been employed on the data to get the results using partial least square structural equation modeling. For this purpose, the data were analyzed in two stages, i.e., measurement model stage and the structural model stage. Results of this study have revealed that trust in wellbeing information plays a significant and positive role in setting preventive behavior and the mental wellbeing of students. Further, it has also been revealed that preventive behavior also plays a significant and positive role in mental wellbeing. Additionally, preventive behavior has been found as an important mediating variable among the relationship of trust in wellbeing information and mental wellbeing. Moreover, family support is crucial by positively moderating the relationship between preventive behavior and mental wellbeing. Many practical implications have been found among which the foremost is that the education institutes must undertake those efforts that aim to ensure the fairness in the information spread regarding the mental wellbeing during seminars, workshops and administration should play a positive role responsible for strengthening the mental health of students by managing ideas, improving student education management, innovating management techniques and methods.Entities:
Keywords: family support; mental wellbeing; preventive behavior; trust; wellbeing
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812494 PMCID: PMC9257002 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Theoretical framework.
Demographics analysis.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Male | 232 | 50.65 |
| Female | 226 | 49.34 |
|
| ||
| High school | 271 | 59.17 |
| Bachelors | 187 | 40.82 |
|
| ||
| Distinction (above 90%) | 78 | 17.03 |
| Good (80–90%) | 145 | 31.65 |
| Average (60–80%) | 139 | 30.34 |
| Below Average (Below 60%) | 96 | 0.96 |
Figure 2Output of measurement model. Trust, trust in wellbeing information; PV, Preventive behavior; MWB, Mental wellbeing; FS, Family Support; FS*PV, Moderating effect of family support.
Figure 3Output of structural model. Trust, Trust in wellbeing information; PV, Preventive behavior; MWB, Mental wellbeing; FS, Family Support; FS*PV, Moderating effect of family support.
Convergent validity and reliability.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family support | FS1 | 0.623 | |||
| FS2 | 0.679 | 0.881 | 0.865 | 0.623 | |
| FS3 | 0.824 | ||||
| FS4 | 0.826 | ||||
| Mental Wellbeing | MWB1 | 0.804 | |||
| MWB2 | 0.842 | 0.888 | 0.916 | 0.687 | |
| MWB3 | 0.883 | ||||
| MWB4 | 0.839 | ||||
| MWB5 | 0.772 | ||||
| Preventive behavior | PV1 | 0.821 | |||
| PV2 | 0.815 | 0.793 | 0.826 | 0.659 | |
| PV3 | 0.882 | ||||
| PV4 | 0.863 | ||||
| Trust in wellbeing | Trust1 | 0.869 | |||
| Information | Trust2 | 0.883 | 0.901 | 0.931 | 0.772 |
| Trust3 | 0.875 | ||||
| Trust4 | 0.887 | ||||
Discriminant validity (HTMT ratio).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| MWB | 0.056 | |||
| PV | 0.084 | 0.523 | ||
| Trust | 0.083 | 0.553 | 0.699 |
Trust, Trust in wellbeing information; PV, Preventive behavior; MWB, Mental wellbeing; FS, Family Support.
Discriminant validity (Fornell and Larcker Criteria).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FS | 0.789 | |||
| MWB | 0.050 | 0.829 | ||
| PV | 0.036 | 0.494 | 0.871 | |
| Trust | −0.019 | 0.525 | 0.627 | 0.878 |
Trust, Trust in wellbeing information; PV, Preventive behavior; MWB, Mental wellbeing; FS, Family Support.
Direct effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust -> MWB | H1 | 0.332 | 0.058 | 5.717 | 0.000 |
| Trust -> PV | H2 | 0.630 | 0.038 | 16.731 | 0.000 |
| PV -> MWB | H3 | 0.284 | 0.066 | 4.322 | 0.000 |
Trust, Trust in wellbeing information; PV, Preventive behavior; MWB, Mental wellbeing; FS, Family Support.
Indirect effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust -> PV -> MWB | H4 | 0.179 | 0.043 | 4.109 | 0.000 |
| FS*PV -> MWB | H5 | 0.103 | 0.045 | 2.119 | 0.035 |
Trust, Trust in wellbeing information; PV, Preventive behavior; MWB, Mental wellbeing; FS, Family Support; FS*PV, Moderating effect of family support.