| Literature DB >> 35812379 |
Roos M de Jong1, Susheel K Singh2,3, Karina Teelen1, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer1, Geert-Jan van Gemert1, Will J R Stone4, Emily Locke5, Jordan Plieskatt5, Michael Theisen2,3, Teun Bousema1, Matthijs M Jore1.
Abstract
Malaria transmission blocking vaccines (TBV) aim to induce antibodies that can interrupt Plasmodium falciparum development in the mosquito midgut and thereby prevent onward malaria transmission. A limited number of TBV candidates have been identified and only three (Pfs25, Pfs230 and Pfs48/45) have entered clinical testing. While one of these candidates may emerge as a highly potent TBV candidate, it is premature to determine if they will generate sufficiently potent and sustained responses. It is therefore important to explore novel candidate antigens. We recently analyzed sera from naturally exposed individuals and found that the presence and/or intensity of antibodies against 12 novel putative surface expressed gametocyte antigens was associated with transmission reducing activity. In this study, protein fragments of these novel TBV candidates were designed and heterologously expressed in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells and Lactococcus lactis. Eleven protein fragments, covering seven TBV candidates, were successfully produced. All tested antigens were recognized by antibodies from individuals living in malaria-endemic areas, indicating that native epitopes are present. All antigens induced antigen-specific antibody responses in mice. Two antigens induced antibodies that recognized a native protein in gametocyte extract, and antibodies elicited by four antigens recognized whole gametocytes. In particular, we found that antigen Pf3D7_0305300, a putative transporter, is abundantly expressed on the surface of gametocytes. However, none of the seven novel TBV candidates expressed here induced an antibody response that reduced parasite development in the mosquito midgut as assessed in the standard membrane feeding assay. Altogether, the antigen fragments used in this study did not prove to be promising transmission blocking vaccine constructs, but led to the identification of two gametocyte surface proteins that may provide new leads for studying gametocyte biology.Entities:
Keywords: drosophila melanogaster S2 cells; lactococcus lactis; malaria; plasmodium falciparum; recombinant expression; transmission blocking vaccines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812379 PMCID: PMC9259988 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.909060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Overview of protein fragments and expression levels in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells and Lactococcus lactis.
| Gene ID | Gene description | Expression fragment (aa) for | Study ID | Molecular Weight (kDa) of protein fragment | Expression in | Expression in | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without R0 | With R0 | ||||||
| PF3D7_0305300 | Transporter, putative | 1-413 | TBC4 | 50.4 | – | + | + |
| PF3D7_1014300 | Conserved protein, unknown function | 1080-1515 | TBC5 | 51.3 | – | – | + |
| PF3D7_1021100 | Conserved Plasmodium protein, unknown function | 1001-1607 | 73.5 | – | – | – | |
| PF3D7_1107900 | Mechanosensitive ion channel protein | 266-808 | 64.9 | – | +- | +- | |
| PF3D7_1143700 | Conserved Plasmodium protein, unknown function | 1-100 | TBC1 | 13 | + | +- | + |
| PF3D7_1306500 | MORN repeat protein, putative | Fragment A: 811-1021 | 26.2 | – | Excluded* | – | |
| Fragment B: 1187-1515 | 40.7 | – | – | +- | |||
| Fragment C: 1563-1689 | TBC2 | 16.3 | + | + | Excluded# | ||
| PF3D7_1314500 | Transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein | 30-173 | TBC6 | 17.9 | +- | + | + |
| PF3D7_1324600 | Conserved Plasmodium protein, unknown function | Fragment A: 663-945 | 33.2 | – | – | – | |
| Fragment B: 1013-1465 | 55.5 | +- | – | +- | |||
| PF3D7_1348000 | Conserved Plasmodium protein, unknown function | 1-112 | TBC3 | 13.7 | + | + | + |
| PF3D7_1360500 | Guanylyl cyclase beta | Fragment A: 2154-2738 | 71.4 | – | +- | – | |
| Fragment B: 2916-3179 | 31.8 | + | – | – | |||
| PF3D7_1433200 | Conserved Plasmodium protein, unknown | Fragment A: 1-535 | 65.7 | – | – | +- | |
| Fragment B: 680-1001 | TBC7 | 39.2 | + | – | + | ||
| Fragment C: 1002-1267 | 33.2 | – | – | – | |||
| PF3D7_1449000 | Gamete Egress and Sporozoite traversal protein | 24-248 | 26.1 | – | – | – | |
&Expression levels are based on small scale expression tests ( and ). “-” not detected, “+-” low expression in soluble fraction, “+” soluble expression.
*Excluded due to the inability to generate a mutation-free expression plasmid.
#Excluded because antigen was already available from S2 cells and L. lactis.
Figure 1Overview of recombinant protein purification and analysis. (A) Illustration of the expression and purification strategy of recombinant proteins. Representative purifications on a Superdex 200 10/300 GL of a nickel-affinity purified protein expressed in (B) Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells or (D) Lactococcus lactis. Inset: Coomassie-stained non-reducing polyacrylamide gel of monomeric peak fractions. The purified proteins expressed in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells (C) and Lactococcus lactis (E) were ran non-reduced (NR) and reduced (R) on a polyacrylamide gel and analyzed for purity using Coomassie-staining. Proteins expressed in S2 cells were also analyzed by glycoprotein staining (C). *indicate antigens that were expressed as R0 chimeras. + and – indicate positive and negative controls, respectively. All antigens expressed as R0 chimeras run at a higher molecular weight, due to the glutamate content of R0.
Figure 2Recombinant proteins show immunoreactivity with plasma samples from individuals living in malaria-endemic areas. Forty malaria-endemic and 7 malaria-naïve plasma samples were analyzed in antigen ELISAs against the respective immunogen indicated. Malaria-endemic samples are categorized based on their transmission reducing activity (TRA) as determined by Stone et al. (16). Optical density (OD) values are reported as individual raw absorbance measurements at 450nm with the median shown as bar. The dotted line represents the mean + 3*SD of the malaria-naïve plasma samples. Samples with OD values above this cut-off are considered positive. DM: Drosophila melanogaster, LL: Lactococcus lactis. Comparison between the <10% and >90% TRA samples was performed using the Mann-Whitney test (**<0.005, ns, not significant).
Recombinant proteins used in mouse immunization study.
| Study ID | Protein | Expression system | Molecular Weight (kDa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TBC1 | 1143700 | DM | 13.0 |
| LL* | 72.3 | ||
| TBC2 | 1306500 C | DM | 16.3 |
| LL | 16.7 | ||
| TBC3 | 1348000 | DM | 14.7 |
| LL | 14.8 | ||
| LL* | 70.3 | ||
| TBC4 | 0305300 | LL | 50.5 |
| TBC5 | R0.1014300 | LL* | 108.0 |
| TBC6 | R0.1314500 | LL* | 73.3 |
| TBC7 | R0.1433200B | LL* | 94.9 |
DM, Drosophila melanogaster; LL, Lactococcus lactis; * indicate antigens that were expressed as R0 chimeras.
Figure 3Immunogenicity of antigens in mice. Mice were immunized three times with 10 µg formulated in Montanide™ ISA720. Midpoint titers (EC50) values of individual mice sera (n=5) from the final bleed (day 56) analyzed in recombinant antigen ELISA against immunogen. Median values per group are shown as bars. Midpoint titers were calculated using sigmoidal curve fitting. For one mouse in TBC3DM and one in TBC3LL we could not fit a curve due to low levels of antibodies, and the midpoint titers were therefore arbitrarily set to 20. Names with * indicate antigens that were expressed as R0 chimeras. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test. Statistically significant differences are indicated in the figure (*<0.05, **<0.01), absence of symbols indicated no statistical significance.
Figure 4Reactivity of antibodies with native gametocyte antigens. Antibody reactivity to antigens in gametocyte extracts was assessed by (A) ELISA and (B) western blot. (A) Raw optical density (OD) values are presented for each individual mouse antisera with the median against native gametocyte extract ELISA. The dotted line represents the mean of all pre-immune sera plus three times the standard deviation. Samples with OD values above this cut-off are considered positive. (B) The sera that showed recognition were repeated in another western blot with comparable results (Data not shown). Red boxes indicate the putative protein of interest. (C) Reactivity with whole gametocytes was analyzed by immunofluorescence assays. Fixed gametocytes were incubated with 1:100 dilution of sera under non-permeabilizing and permeabilizing conditions. Scale bar represents 10 µm. Names with * indicate antigens that were expressed as R0 chimeras.
Figure 5IgGs from mice immunized with novel transmission blocking vaccine candidates do not reduce transmission. Purified IgGs were tested in a single standard membrane feeding assay at a final concentration of 750 µg/mL except for TBC1LL* and TBC3LL*, they were tested at 540 and 590 µg/mL due to low IgG yield, respectively. Transmission reducing activity (% TRA) estimates are shown with 95% confidence intervals. R0.6C showed statistical significant TRA (p<0.001), while none of the other groups showed significant TRA. Names with * indicate antigens that were expressed as R0 chimeras. Note that for TBC7LL* only 17 mosquitoes had fed.