| Literature DB >> 35812154 |
Md Khalid Anwer1, Farhat Fatima1, Mohammed Muqtader Ahmed1, Mohammed F Aldawsari1, Amer S Alali1, Mohd Abul Kalam2, Aws Alshamsan2, Musaed Alkholief2, Abdul Malik2, Alanazi Az3, Ramadan Al-Shdefat4.
Abstract
Abemaciclib (AC) is a novel, orally available drug molecule approved for the treatment of breast cancer. Due to its low bioavailability, its administration frequency is two to three times a day that can decrease patient compliance. Sustained release formulation are needed for prolong the action and to reduce the adverse effects. The aim of current study was to develop sustained release NSs of AC. Nanosponges (NSs) was prepared by emulsion-solvent diffusion method using ethyl-cellulose (EC) and Kolliphor P-188 (KP-188) as sustained-release polymer and surfactant, respectively. Effects of varying surfactant concentration and drug: polymer proportions on the particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ζP), entrapment efficiency (%EE), and drug loading (%DL) were investigated. The results of AC loaded NSs (ACN1-ACN5) exhibited PS (366.3-842.2 nm), PDI (0.448-0.853), ζP (-8.21 to -19.7 mV), %EE (48.45-79.36%) and %DL (7.69-19.17%), respectively. Moreover, ACN2 showed sustained release of Abemaciclib (77.12 ± 2.54%) in 24 h Higuchi matrix as best fit kinetics model. MTT assay signified ACN2 as potentials cytotoxic nanocarrier against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Further, ACN2 displayed drug release property without variation in the % release after exposing the product at 25 °C, 5 °C, and 45 °C storage conditions for six months. This investigation proved that the developed NSs would be an efficient carrier to sustain the release of AC in order to improve efficacy against breast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Abemaciclib; Biocompatibility; Cytotoxicity; Ethylcellulose; Nanosponges
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812154 PMCID: PMC9257851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.03.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.562
Fig. 1Chemical structure of Abemaciclib.
Formulation detail and particle characteristics of AC-loaded Nanosponges (ACNs).
| ACN1 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 442.3 ± 2.34 | 0.770 ± 0.23 | −14.64 ± 2.65 | 61.67 ± 2.54 | 2.12 ± 0.21 |
| ACN2 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 366.3 ± 2.65 | 0.448 ± 0.34 | −19.20 ± 4.08 | 79.36 ± 1.65 | 1.45 ± 0.32 |
| ACN3 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 717.7 ± 3.56 | 0.519 ± 0.12 | −13.65 ± 1.89 | 57.62 ± 1.32 | 2.83 ± 0.87 |
| ACN4 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 547.9 ± 2.87 | 0.641 ± 0.23 | −11.21 ± 1.12 | 48.45 ± 2.43 | 1.78 ± 0.34 |
| ACN5 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 842.2 ± 4.65 | 0.853 ± 0.13 | −8.21 ± 2.43 | 35.69 ± 2.87 | 1.79 ± 0.78 |
AC (Abemaciclib), EC (Ethyl Cellulose), KP-188 (Koliphor P-188), PS (Particle size), PDI (Polydispersity index), ZP (Zeta Potential) EE (Entrapment efficiency) and DL (Drug loading).
Fig. 2Particle size and zeta potential of the optimized Abemaciclib-loaded Nanosponges (ACN2) (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
Fig. 3Comparative FTIR spectra of pure AC and optimized Nanosponge (ACN2).
Fig. 4Comparative DSC spectra of pure AC and optimized Nanosponge (ACN2).
Fig. 5The X-ray Diffractograms of pure AC (a) and the optimized Nanosponge (ACN2) (b).
Fig. 6SEM images for pure AC and the optimized Nanosponge (ACN2).
Fig. 7Comparative in vitro release profile of pure AC and optimized ACN2 (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
Stability data of optimized Nanosponges (ACN2) (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
| – | 0 | 366 ± 2.6 | −19.2 ± 2.5 | 79.3 ± 1.6 | 77.1 ± 2.6 |
| RT (25 ± 2 °C) | 1 | 364 ± 1.4 | −19.3 ± 1.9 | 77.5 ± 2.1 | 77.4 ± 2.3 |
| 3 | 367 ± 6.3 | −17.6 ± 3.1 | 76.1 ± 3.7 | 75.9 ± 2.9 | |
| FT (4 ± 2 °C) | 1 | 363 ± 7.6 | −18.8 ± 4.9 | 73.2 ± 1.9 | 72.5 ± 1.7 |
| 3 | 374 ± 8.1 | −16.7 ± 5.0 | 70.3 ± 1.5 | 71.2 ± 1.5 | |
| AT (60 ± 2 °C, 75% RH) | 1 | 384 ± 9.6 | −14.4 ± 2.3 | 66.7 ± 1.1 | 68.4 ± 2.0 |
| 3 | 391 ± 7.5 | −9.6 ± 1.7 | 61.4 ± 2.1 | 64.2 ± 1.2 |
RT = Room temperature; FT = Freezing temperature and AT = Accelerated temperature.
Fig. 8MTT assay (cell viability) values of pure AC and optimized Nanosponge (ACN2).