| Literature DB >> 35812118 |
Lixia Li1, Weifeng Zhu1, Guohua Lin2, Chuyun Chen1, Donghui Tang3, Shiyu Lin2, Xiaorong Weng3, Liqin Xie1, Lihong Lu1, Weilin Li4.
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture is a well-known treatment option for ischemic stroke recovery, but evidence of its effectiveness remains limited. This is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for ischemic stroke rehabilitation.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; clinical trial; ischemic stroke; randomized controlled trial (RCT); rehabilitation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812118 PMCID: PMC9260687 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.897078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Figure 1Flow diagram showing the study design.
Baseline characteristics of patients (n = 497).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 107(67.3) | 107(61.8) | 97(58.8) | 311 |
| Female | 52 (32.7) | 66(38.2) | 68(41.2) | 186 |
| Age | 64.3± 8.3 | 65.2 ± 8.5 | 65.4 ± 6.9 | 64.98 ± 0.3 |
| Education | ||||
| Primary school or illiterate | 31(19.5) | 31(18.0) | 36(22.0) | 98(19.8) |
| Secondary school | 53(33.3) | 68(39.5) | 62(37.8) | 183(37.0) |
| High school | 61(38.4) | 61(35.5) | 61(35.5) | 176(35.6) |
| University | 14(8.8) | 12(7.0) | 54(32.9) | 38(7.7) |
| Master's or above | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Career | ||||
| Office clerk | 23(14.5) | 23(13.3) | 18(10.9) | 64(12.9) |
| Manual worker | 22(13.8) | 27(15.6) | 31(18.8) | 80(16.1) |
| Student | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Retired | 84(52.8) | 99(57.2) | 87(52.7) | 270(54.3) |
| Unemployed | 11(6.9) | 13(7.5) | 12(7.3) | 36(7.2) |
| Other | 19(11.9) | 11(6.4) | 17(10.3) | 47(9.5) |
| Residence | ||||
| Town | 132(83.0) | 150(86.7) | 137(83.0) | 419(84.3) |
| Village | 27(17.0) | 23(13.3) | 28(17.0) | 78(15.7) |
| Smoking | ||||
| None | 114(71.7) | 123(71.1) | 132(80.0) | 369(74.2) |
| Former smoker | 31(19.5) | 27(15.6) | 20(12.1) | 78(15.7) |
| Current smoker | 14(8.8) | 23(13.3) | 13(7.9) | 50(10.1) |
| Alcohol | ||||
| None | 130(81.8) | 151(87.3) | 139(84.2) | 420(84.5) |
| Former user | 19(11.9) | 13(7.5) | 17(10.3) | 49(9.9) |
| Current user | 10(6.3) | 9(5.2) | 9(5.5) | 28(5.6) |
Ischemic stroke characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease course | |||||
| Month | 3.49 ± 3.11 | 4.12 ± 4.10 | 3.83 ± 3.25 | 1.097 | 0.335 |
| Times of stroke | 1.26 ± 0.53 | 1.25 ± 0.44 | 1.28 ± 0.50 | 0.134 | 0.857 |
| Infarct size | |||||
| Lacunar | 28(17.7) | 29(17.8) | 45(27.4) | 6.467 | 0.373 |
| Multiple | 81(51.3) | 87(53.4) | 78(47.6) | ||
| Large area | 16(10.1) | 15(9.2) | 13(7.9) | ||
| Other | 33(20.9) | 32(19.6) | 28(17.1) | ||
| Family history of stroke | |||||
| No | 129(81.1) | 134(77.9) | 123(74.5) | 4.635 | 0.324 |
| Unknown | 26(16.4) | 36(20.9) | 35(21.2) | ||
| Yes | 4(2.5) | 2(1.2) | 7(4.2) |
Scores and changes for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Barthel Index (BI), and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the three study arms (x ± SD).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIHSS | Arm 1 | 7.13 ± 4.91 | 5.98 ± 3.72 | 4.59 ± 3.47 | |
| Arm 2 | 6.88 ± 4.08 | 6.11 ± 4.01 | 4.88 ± 4.11 | ||
| Control group | 6.98 ± 3.93 | 6.62 ± 4.03 | 5.81 ± 4.11 | ||
| BI | Arm 1 | 54.94 ± 27.01 | 60.00 ± 27.92 | 67.50 ± 28.22 | 69.54 ± 27.69 |
| Arm 2 | 57.82 ± 27.40 | 61.84 ± 27.58 | 69.26 ± 8.64 | 71.15 ± 28.73 | |
| Control group | 54.34 ± 27.52 | 56.62 ± 28.31 | 60.52 ± 28.69 | 62.68 ± 28.69 | |
| MAS | Arm 1 | 2.17 ± 1.32 | 2.03 ± 1.18 | 1.78 ± 0.99 | |
| Arm 2 | 2.34 ± 1.38 | 2.06 ± 1.24 | 1.80 ± 1.06 | ||
| Control group | 2.18 ± 1.37 | 2.09 ± 1.24 | 1.96 ± 1.17 |
There were significant differences between the three groups.
A comparison between arm 1 and the control group was statistically significant.
A comparison between arm 2 and the control group was also statistically significant.
Figure 2Scores of the (A) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), (B) the Barthel Index (BI), and (C) the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the three groups. *, # denotes significant difference.