Yanxia He1,2, Yan Gao1,2, Liqin Ping1,2, Haixia He3, Cheng Huang1,2, Bing Bai1,2, Xiaoxiao Wang1,2, Zhiming Li1,2, Qingqing Cai1,2, Yuhua Huang1,4, Xueyi Pan5, Wenbin Zeng5, Yanan Liu5, Huiqiang Huang6,7. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 5. Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China. 6. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. huanghqsysucc@163.com. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. huanghqsysucc@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anti-PD-1 antibody (anti-PD-1 mAb) showed favorable outcomes in some patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). However, the role of anti-PD-1 antibody in NK/T-cell lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (NK/T-LAHS) remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of anti-PD-1 antibody-based treatment in NK/T-LAHS patients. METHODS: The clinical data of 98 patients diagnosed with NK/T-LAHS at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University from May 2014 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received anti-HLH [HLH-2004 (etoposide, dexamethasone, cyclosporine A) or DEP-based (liposomal doxorubicin, etoposide, methylprednisolone)] regimen and sequential anti-ENKTL chemotherapy (ChT) combined with anti-PD-1 antibody or not. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) of the anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT regimens was higher than that of the ChT regimens (73.3% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.041). The toxicity of the anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT regimens was tolerable. Except for higher rate of neutropenia, no significant difference in adverse events (AEs) was observed between the two groups. When the optimal response to anti-ENKTL was achieved, the median EBV DNA levels in patients who received anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT were significantly lower than patients who received ChT only (878 copies/mL vs. 18,600 copies/mL, P = 0.001). With a median follow-up of 26.6 months (range 0-65.9 months), the median overall survival (mOS) was 3.5 months (95% CI：2.3-4.7 months). Patients treated with anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT experienced a longer mOS than those who received ChT only [5.2 months (95% CI: 2.5-7.8 months) vs. 1.5 months (95% CI: 0.5-2.6 months), P = 0.002]. Cox multivariate analysis found that anti-PD-1 mAb was an independent prognostic factor for all NK/T-LAHS patients. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, anti-PD-1 mAb combined with ChT regimens seemed to be associated with prolonged survival in NK/T-LAHS patients and may represent a potentially promising treatment strategy for this population.
PURPOSE: Anti-PD-1 antibody (anti-PD-1 mAb) showed favorable outcomes in some patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). However, the role of anti-PD-1 antibody in NK/T-cell lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (NK/T-LAHS) remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of anti-PD-1 antibody-based treatment in NK/T-LAHS patients. METHODS: The clinical data of 98 patients diagnosed with NK/T-LAHS at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University from May 2014 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received anti-HLH [HLH-2004 (etoposide, dexamethasone, cyclosporine A) or DEP-based (liposomal doxorubicin, etoposide, methylprednisolone)] regimen and sequential anti-ENKTL chemotherapy (ChT) combined with anti-PD-1 antibody or not. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) of the anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT regimens was higher than that of the ChT regimens (73.3% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.041). The toxicity of the anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT regimens was tolerable. Except for higher rate of neutropenia, no significant difference in adverse events (AEs) was observed between the two groups. When the optimal response to anti-ENKTL was achieved, the median EBV DNA levels in patients who received anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT were significantly lower than patients who received ChT only (878 copies/mL vs. 18,600 copies/mL, P = 0.001). With a median follow-up of 26.6 months (range 0-65.9 months), the median overall survival (mOS) was 3.5 months (95% CI：2.3-4.7 months). Patients treated with anti-PD-1 mAb plus ChT experienced a longer mOS than those who received ChT only [5.2 months (95% CI: 2.5-7.8 months) vs. 1.5 months (95% CI: 0.5-2.6 months), P = 0.002]. Cox multivariate analysis found that anti-PD-1 mAb was an independent prognostic factor for all NK/T-LAHS patients. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, anti-PD-1 mAb combined with ChT regimens seemed to be associated with prolonged survival in NK/T-LAHS patients and may represent a potentially promising treatment strategy for this population.
Authors: Wei Ding; Betsy R LaPlant; Timothy G Call; Sameer A Parikh; Jose F Leis; Rong He; Tait D Shanafelt; Sutapa Sinha; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Andrew L Feldman; Thomas M Habermann; Thomas E Witzig; Gregory A Wiseman; Yi Lin; Erik Asmus; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Michael J Conte; Deborah A Bowen; Casey N Aitken; Daniel L Van Dyke; Patricia T Greipp; Xin Liu; Xiaosheng Wu; Henan Zhang; Charla R Secreto; Shulan Tian; Esteban Braggio; Linda E Wellik; Ivana Micallef; David S Viswanatha; Huihuang Yan; Asher A Chanan-Khan; Neil E Kay; Haidong Dong; Stephen M Ansell Journal: Blood Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nasser K Altorki; Timothy E McGraw; Alain C Borczuk; Ashish Saxena; Jeffrey L Port; Brendon M Stiles; Benjamin E Lee; Nicholas J Sanfilippo; Ronald J Scheff; Bradley B Pua; James F Gruden; Paul J Christos; Cathy Spinelli; Joyce Gakuria; Manik Uppal; Bhavneet Binder; Olivier Elemento; Karla V Ballman; Silvia C Formenti Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Richard I Fisher; Sally F Barrington; Franco Cavalli; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; T Andrew Lister Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel L Barber; E John Wherry; David Masopust; Baogong Zhu; James P Allison; Arlene H Sharpe; Gordon J Freeman; Rafi Ahmed Journal: Nature Date: 2005-12-28 Impact factor: 49.962