Literature DB >> 35809097

A Within-Subject Comparison of Face-to-Face and Telemedicine Screening Using the Timed Water Swallow Test (TWST) and the Test of Mastication and Swallowing of Solids (TOMASS).

Fredrik Karlsson1, Leo Lovric2, Josephine Matthelié2, Louise Brage2, Patricia Hägglund2.   

Abstract

The Timed Water Swallow Test (TWST) and the Test of Mastication of Solids (TOMASS) are dysphagia screening procedures that have been shown to be reliably assessed from video. The reliability of the procedures performed over telemedicine has not previously been assessed. TWST and TOMASS outcomes in two situations (both face-to-face and over telemedicine) were compared for 48 participants (aged 60-90; 27 with clinical conditions and 21 older persons). Both testing situation and test performed order were randomized, and all assessment procedures were performed within 3 h of each other. The results indicated a high level of agreement between face-to-face and telemedicine screening outcomes for TWST and TOMASS, respectively. The assessments indicated an 83% and 76% agreement in classifications of individual participants as within or outside normal limits for the TWST and TOMASS for the two test situations. The TWST showed a balanced distribution in differing classification in telemedicine (0.16-0.19 error rates). The TOMASS procedure classified more participants as outside normal limits over telemedicine compared to face-to-face administration. Agreement in the observed number of swallows was substantially lower than other outcome measures, which is attributed to increased difficulty in observing this property over video. Most participants (60%) reported that they would prefer telemedicine over face-to-face assessments, and 90% viewed the procedure as more accessible than expected. All participants were satisfied with the telemedicine procedures. The results suggest that clinical assessment of dysphagia over telemedicine using the TWST and TOMASS are viable alternatives to face-to-face administration of the procedures.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparison of administration situations; Dysphagia screening; Telemedicine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35809097     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-022-10490-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  2 in total

1.  The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): reliability, validity and international normative data.

Authors:  Maggie-Lee Huckabee; Theresa McIntosh; Laura Fuller; Morgan Curry; Paige Thomas; Margaret Walshe; Ellen McCague; Irene Battel; Dalia Nogueira; Ulrike Frank; Lenie van den Engel-Hoek; Oshrat Sella-Weiss
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Mastication in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Types 2 and 3 is Characterized by Abnormal Efficiency, Reduced Endurance, and Fatigue.

Authors:  W L van der Pol; L van den Engel-Hoek; A M B van der Heul; R P A van Eijk; R I Wadman; F Asselman; I Cuppen; R A J Nievelstein; E Gerrits
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.733

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.