Moriah R Arnold1, David G Coughlin2, Barbara H Brumbach3, Denis S Smirnov2, Luis Concha-Marambio4, Carly M Farris4, Yihua Ma4, Yongya Kim2, Edward N Wilson5, Jeffrey A Kaye6, Annie Hiniker7, Randy L Woltjer8, Doug R Galasko2, Joseph F Quinn6,9. 1. Medical Scientist Training Program, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 2. Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 3. Biostatistics and Design Program, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 4. Amprion Inc, San Francisco, CA. 5. Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 6. Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 7. Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 8. Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 9. Portland Virginia Medical Center, Parkinson's Disease Research Education and Clinical Care Center (PADRECC), Portland, OR.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of α-synuclein seed amplification assay (αSyn-SAA) in antemortem and postmortem cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of autopsy-confirmed patients with different distributions of pathological αSyn, co-pathologies, and clinical diagnoses. METHODS: The αSyn-SAA was used to test antemortem CSF samples from 119 subjects with a variety of clinical syndromes and standardized neuropathological examinations from Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and University of California San Diego (UCSD; 56 additional postmortem CSF samples available). The αSyn-SAA was also applied to frontal cortex and amygdala homogenates. Sensitivity and specificity were compared across distributions of αSyn pathology. Clinical data and co-pathologies were compared across αSyn-SAA positive and negative groups. RESULTS: Fifty-three individuals without and 66 with αSyn-pathology (neocortical [n = 38], limbic [n = 7], and amygdala-predominant [n = 21]) were included. There was a sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 98.1% of the αSyn-SAA to identify patients with limbic/neocortical pathology from antemortem CSF. Sensitivity to detect amygdala-predominant pathology was only 14.3%. Postmortem CSF and brain tissue αSyn-SAA analyses also showed higher assay positivity in samples from limbic/neocortical cases. INTERPRETATION: CSF αSyn-SAA reliably identifies αSyn seeds in patients with diffuse αSyn pathology in the context of co-pathology and non-Lewy body disease (LBD) diagnoses. The analysis of brain homogenates suggests that pathological αSyn in the amygdala might differ from pathological αSyn in the frontal cortex. The αSyn-SAA might facilitate the differential diagnosis of dementias with mixed pathologies. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:650-662.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of α-synuclein seed amplification assay (αSyn-SAA) in antemortem and postmortem cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of autopsy-confirmed patients with different distributions of pathological αSyn, co-pathologies, and clinical diagnoses. METHODS: The αSyn-SAA was used to test antemortem CSF samples from 119 subjects with a variety of clinical syndromes and standardized neuropathological examinations from Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and University of California San Diego (UCSD; 56 additional postmortem CSF samples available). The αSyn-SAA was also applied to frontal cortex and amygdala homogenates. Sensitivity and specificity were compared across distributions of αSyn pathology. Clinical data and co-pathologies were compared across αSyn-SAA positive and negative groups. RESULTS: Fifty-three individuals without and 66 with αSyn-pathology (neocortical [n = 38], limbic [n = 7], and amygdala-predominant [n = 21]) were included. There was a sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 98.1% of the αSyn-SAA to identify patients with limbic/neocortical pathology from antemortem CSF. Sensitivity to detect amygdala-predominant pathology was only 14.3%. Postmortem CSF and brain tissue αSyn-SAA analyses also showed higher assay positivity in samples from limbic/neocortical cases. INTERPRETATION: CSF αSyn-SAA reliably identifies αSyn seeds in patients with diffuse αSyn pathology in the context of co-pathology and non-Lewy body disease (LBD) diagnoses. The analysis of brain homogenates suggests that pathological αSyn in the amygdala might differ from pathological αSyn in the frontal cortex. The αSyn-SAA might facilitate the differential diagnosis of dementias with mixed pathologies. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:650-662.
Authors: Elaine R Peskind; Robert Riekse; Joseph F Quinn; Jeffrey Kaye; Christopher M Clark; Martin R Farlow; Charles Decarli; Charles Chabal; Darcy Vavrek; Murray A Raskind; Douglas Galasko Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2005 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Joshua M Shulman; Sukriti Nag; Sue E Leurgans; Steven E Arnold; Martha C Morris; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Michal Lubomski; R Louise Rushworth; Will Lee; Kelly L Bertram; David R Williams Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Guerry M Peavy; Steven D Edland; Belinda M Toole; Lawrence A Hansen; Douglas R Galasko; Ann M Mayo Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: James B Leverenz; Mark A Fishel; Elaine R Peskind; Thomas J Montine; David Nochlin; Ellen Steinbart; Murray A Raskind; Gerard D Schellenberg; Thomas D Bird; Debby Tsuang Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-03
Authors: Ian G McKeith; Bradley F Boeve; Dennis W Dickson; Glenda Halliday; John-Paul Taylor; Daniel Weintraub; Dag Aarsland; James Galvin; Johannes Attems; Clive G Ballard; Ashley Bayston; Thomas G Beach; Frédéric Blanc; Nicolaas Bohnen; Laura Bonanni; Jose Bras; Patrik Brundin; David Burn; Alice Chen-Plotkin; John E Duda; Omar El-Agnaf; Howard Feldman; Tanis J Ferman; Dominic Ffytche; Hiroshige Fujishiro; Douglas Galasko; Jennifer G Goldman; Stephen N Gomperts; Neill R Graff-Radford; Lawrence S Honig; Alex Iranzo; Kejal Kantarci; Daniel Kaufer; Walter Kukull; Virginia M Y Lee; James B Leverenz; Simon Lewis; Carol Lippa; Angela Lunde; Mario Masellis; Eliezer Masliah; Pamela McLean; Brit Mollenhauer; Thomas J Montine; Emilio Moreno; Etsuro Mori; Melissa Murray; John T O'Brien; Sotoshi Orimo; Ronald B Postuma; Shankar Ramaswamy; Owen A Ross; David P Salmon; Andrew Singleton; Angela Taylor; Alan Thomas; Pietro Tiraboschi; Jon B Toledo; John Q Trojanowski; Debby Tsuang; Zuzana Walker; Masahito Yamada; Kenji Kosaka Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alex Iranzo; Graham Fairfoul; Anutra Chumbala Na Ayudhaya; Monica Serradell; Ellen Gelpi; Isabel Vilaseca; Raquel Sanchez-Valle; Carles Gaig; Joan Santamaria; Eduard Tolosa; Renata L Riha; Alison J E Green Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Wolfgang Singer; Ann M Schmeichel; Mohammad Shahnawaz; James D Schmelzer; David M Sletten; Tonette L Gehrking; Jade A Gehrking; Anita D Olson; Mariana D Suarez; Pinaki P Misra; Claudio Soto; Phillip A Low Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 11.274
Authors: Graham Fairfoul; Lynne I McGuire; Suvankar Pal; James W Ironside; Juliane Neumann; Sharon Christie; Catherine Joachim; Margaret Esiri; Samuel G Evetts; Michal Rolinski; Fahd Baig; Claudio Ruffmann; Richard Wade-Martins; Michele T M Hu; Laura Parkkinen; Alison J E Green Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2016-08-28 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Marco J Russo; Christina D Orru; Luis Concha-Marambio; Simone Giaisi; Bradley R Groveman; Carly M Farris; Bret Holguin; Andrew G Hughson; David-Erick LaFontant; Chelsea Caspell-Garcia; Christopher S Coffey; Jennifer Mollon; Samantha J Hutten; Kalpana Merchant; Roland G Heym; Claudio Soto; Byron Caughey; Un Jung Kang Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 7.801