| Literature DB >> 35808749 |
Chunbao Li1, Xiaotian Li1, Shen Li2, Di Guan2, Chang Xiao1, Yanyan Xu3, Valentina Y Soloveva4, Hojiboev Dalerjon5, Pengju Qin6, Xiaohui Liu7.
Abstract
This is a study on how to reduce shrinkage and improve crack resistance of foamed concrete. By selecting different curing temperatures and humidity, six different curing conditions were analyzed. The shrinkage deformation and maximum crack width of foamed concrete blocks with water-cement ratios of 0.4 and 0.5, under six curing conditions, were measured by a comparator and optical microscope, and the cracking time was recorded. The effects of curing temperature, humidity and water-cement ratio on the shrinkage and crack resistance of the foamed concrete were analyzed by comparing the experimental results of each group. We studied the primary and secondary order of the three factors affecting the drying shrinkage of foamed concrete. The results show that: temperature is the primary factor that changes the drying shrinkage performance of foamed concrete, followed by the water-cement ratio, and finally humidity. The interaction of these three factors is not obvious. The shrinkage of foamed concrete increases with the increase in temperature; increasing the humidity of curing can control the water loss rate of foamed concrete and reduce shrinkage. Lower humidity and higher temperature will make cracks appear earlier; with an increase in the water-cement ratio, the initial cracking time is shortened and the cracking property of foamed concrete is improved.Entities:
Keywords: concrete curing; foamed concrete; plastic shrinkage and cracking; water–cement ratio
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808749 PMCID: PMC9269024 DOI: 10.3390/polym14132703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1The route of the East China–Russia pipeline.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of foamed concrete tunnel filling: (a) sectional structure diagram; (b) diagram of the tunnel interior.
Cement physical performance indicators.
| Label | Initial Setting Time/min | Final Setting Time/min | Packing Density/Kg/m3 | The Compressive Strength/Mpa | Flexural Strength/MPa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Day | 7 Day | 28 Day | 3 Day | 7 Day | 28 Day | ||||
|
| 70 | 242 | 1137 | 18.5 | 28 | 47 | 3.6 | 5.1 | 7.3 |
Chemical composition of fly ash.
| Composition | SO3 | MgO | CaO | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | SiO2 | Ignition Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.66% | 1.09% | 3.53% | 4.04% | 30.37% | 50.76% | 3.32% |
Figure 3Foaming agent for HT foamed concrete.
Foamed concrete base mix ratio.
| Number | Water-Cement Ratio | The Fly Ash/kg | Cement/kg | Water/kg | HTFC Mineral Admixtures/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.4 | 202 | 552 | 368 | 166 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 202 | 552 | 460 | 166 |
Figure 4Drying shrinkage test: (a) comparator; (b) drying shrinkage specimen.
Figure 5Apparatus for cracking test: (a) reading microscope; (b) oval mold; (c) casting the specimens; (d) specimen forming.
Dry shrinkage of foamed concrete in different environments.
| Number | Water-Cement Ratio | Maintenance Time before Mold Removal | The Shrinkage of the Specimen (×10−6) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 5 d | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | 28 d | |||
| 1 | 0.4 | 1 d | 521 | 1014 | 1208 | 1391 | 1492 | 1588 |
| 3 d | 394 | 933 | 1135 | 1321 | 1410 | 1480 | ||
| 0.5 | 1 d | 547 | 1065 | 1225 | 1415 | 1556 | 1607 | |
| 3 d | 472 | 984 | 1193 | 1370 | 1484 | 1507 | ||
| 2 | 0.4 | 1 d | 601 | 1075 | 1248 | 1450 | 1585 | 1633 |
| 3 d | 580 | 990 | 1195 | 1387 | 1465 | 1580 | ||
| 0.5 | 1 d | 679 | 1132 | 1350 | 1587 | 1788 | 1833 | |
| 3 d | 620 | 1078 | 1355 | 1468 | 1583 | 1654 | ||
| 3 | 0.4 | 1 d | 624 | 1080 | 1325 | 1543 | 1680 | 1740 |
| 3 d | 605 | 999 | 1200 | 1407 | 1545 | 1617 | ||
| 0.5 | 1 d | 650 | 1195 | 1380 | 1576 | 1725 | 1794 | |
| 3 d | 590 | 1026 | 1214 | 1423 | 1550 | 1655 | ||
| 4 | 0.4 | 1 d | 605 | 1125 | 1330 | 1510 | 1664 | 1712 |
| 3 d | 609 | 1035 | 1270 | 1478 | 1624 | 1695 | ||
| 0.5 | 1 d | 691 | 1205 | 1420 | 1630 | 1785 | 1860 | |
| 3 d | 658 | 1130 | 1325 | 1505 | 1695 | 1740 | ||
| 5 | 0.4 | 1 d | 730 | 1316 | 1605 | 1745 | 1789 | 1807 |
| 3 d | 720 | 1280 | 1410 | 1590 | 1695 | 1780 | ||
| 0.5 | 1 d | 750 | 1378 | 1680 | 1793 | 1830 | 1850 | |
| 3 d | 727 | 1240 | 1420 | 1579 | 1680 | 1726 | ||
| 6 | 0.4 | 1 d | 760 | 1446 | 1638 | 1685 | 1743 | 1778 |
| 3 d | 705 | 1403 | 1587 | 1615 | 1874 | 1740 | ||
| 0.5 | 1 d | 870 | 1524 | 1730 | 1784 | 1827 | 1896 | |
| 3 d | 820 | 1480 | 1670 | 1706 | 1801 | 1854 | ||
Analysis of the effect of various factors on the shrinkage of 28-day foamed concrete.
| The Source of the Variance | The Sum of the Deviations from the Mean | Degree of Freedom (df) | Average Variance | F | Sig |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58,129.167 | 1 | 29,064.583 | 36.395 | 0.027 |
|
| 28,856.33 | 1 | 8856.33 | 31.090 | 0.030 |
|
| 28,227.000 | 1 | 28,227.000 | 35.346 | 0.027 |
|
| 9937.167 | 2 | 4960.583 | 6.2222 | 0.138 |
|
| 10,208.333 | 1 | 10,208.333 | 12.783 | 0.070 |
|
| 444.500 | 2 | 222.250 | 0.278 | 0.782 |
Analysis of the effect of temperature on the shrinkage of 28-day foamed concrete.
| Temperature | Average Value | Estimate the Marginal Mean | 95%Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
| 25 | 1665.3 | 14.1 | 1604.5 | 1726.1 |
| 45 | 1776.5 | 13.8 | 1715.7 | 1837.3 |
| 65 | 1832.7 | 13.7 | 1771.9 | 1893.5 |
Analysis of the effect of humidity factors on the shrinkage of 28-day foamed concrete.
| Humidity | Average Value | Estimated Marginal Value | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
| 15 | 1785.3 | 10.5 | 1735.7 | 1834.9 |
| 75 | 1735.0 | 11.5 | 1681.3 | 1780.7 |
Analysis of the effect of water–ash ratio factors on the shrinkage of 28-day foamed concrete.
| Water-Cement Ratio | Average Value | Estimated Marginal Value | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
| 0.4 | 1709.7 | 11.5 | 1660.0 | 1759.3 |
| 0.5 | 1806.7 | 10.5 | 1757.0 | 1856.3 |
Figure 6Drying shrinkage of foamed concrete at different curing temperatures: (a) 0.4 water–cement ratio dry shrinkage of foamed concrete; (b) 0.5 water–cement ratio dry shrinkage of foamed concrete.
Figure 7Drying shrinkage of foamed concrete under different curing temperatures (RH = 15%): (a) 0.4 water–cement ratio dry shrinkage of foamed concrete; (b) 0.5 water–cement ratio dry shrinkage of foamed concrete.
Figure 8Drying shrinkage of foamed concrete under different curing humidity: (a) 0.4 water–cement ratio dry shrinkage of foamed concrete; (b) 0.5 water–cement ratio dry shrinkage of foamed concrete.
Initial cracking time under different curing environments (unit in the table: h).
| Water-Cement Ratio | 0.4 | 0.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | |||
| 1 | 70.8 | 68.3 | |
| 2 | 45.3 | 41.7 | |
| 3 | 48.2 | 46.5 | |
| 4 | 16.4 | 11.3 | |
| 5 | 39.8 | 35.7 | |
| 6 | 8.3 | 7.2 | |
Figure 9Initial cracking time of foamed concrete under different curing conditions: (a) 0.4 water–cement ratio initial cracking time of foamed concrete; (b) 0.5 water–cement ratio initial cracking time of foamed concrete.
Figure 10Initial cracking time of foamed concrete with different water–cement ratios: (a) RH = 75% initial cracking time of foamed concrete; (b) RH = 15% initial cracking time of foamed concrete.
Figure 11Maximum crack width of foamed concrete under different curing environments.