| Literature DB >> 35808727 |
Dazhi Wang1,2,3, Zeshan Abbas1, Liangkun Lu1, Shiwen Liang2, Xiangyu Zhao1, Pengfei Xu1, Kuipeng Zhao1, Liujia Suo1,2, Yan Cui1,2, Penghe Yin1,2, Bin Tang4, Jin Xie4, Yong Yang5, Junsheng Liang1,2.
Abstract
The fabrication of various micro-patterns on polymer insulating substrates is a current requirement in micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) and packaging sectors. In this paper, we use electrohydrodynamic jet (E-Jet) printing to create multifaceted and stable micro-patterns on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate. Initially, simulation was performed to investigate optimized printing settings in phase field physics for the usage of two distinct functional inks. A series of simulation experiments was conducted, and it was determined that the following parameters are optimised: applied pressure of 40 kPa, high pulse voltage of 1.95 kV, low dc voltage of 1.60 kV, duty cycle of 80%, pulse frequency of 60 Hz, printing height of 0.25 mm, and printing speed of 1 mm/s. Then, experiments showed that adjusting a pressure value of 40 kPa and regulating the SEMICOSIL988/1 K ink to print micro-drops on a polymer substrate with a thickness of 1 mm prevents coffee staining. The smallest measured droplet size was 200 μm. Furthermore, underfill (UF 3808) ink was driven with applied pressure to 50 kPa while other parameters were left constant, and the minimum size of linear patterns was printed to 105 μm on 0.5-mm-thick PET substrate. During the micro-drip and cone-jet regimes, the consistency and diameter of printed micro-structures were accurately regulated at a pulse frequency of 60 Hz and a duty cycle of 80%.Entities:
Keywords: MEMS devices; PET substrate; direct writing method; drop-on-demand; micro-patterns
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808727 PMCID: PMC9269559 DOI: 10.3390/polym14132683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Forces acting around Taylor cone in the E-Jet printing process.
Figure 2The numerical simulation of E-Jet printing (a) combined needle structure (b) The geometric model and basic boundary conditions and the local refined meshing scheme.
The boundary conditions for electric charge field and various fluid fields.
| Boundary Condition | Electric Charge Field | Fluid Field |
|---|---|---|
| A: Steel needle inlet | u = Qmetal/Ametal | |
| B: Quartz needle inlet | u = Qquartz/Aquartz | |
| C: Wall of steel needle | u = 0 | |
| D: Wall of quartz needle | u = 0 | |
| E: Axisymmetric model | ur = 0 | |
| F: Outlet of needle |
Figure 3(a) Photograph of specific simulated outcomes obtained under optimum settings during the micro-drip regime (b) image of specific simulated results obtained with optimal settings during the cone-jet regime.
Figure 4Flow diagram of the E-Jet printing process with pulse voltage implementation.
Physical characteristics of the different functional inks used in existing work.
| Functional Ink | Density | Dynamic Viscosity | Surface Tension | Storage Modulus | Dielectric Constant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UF 3808 | 1.16 | 450,000 | 0.031 | 260 | 3.24 |
| SEMICOSIL988/1K | 1.1 | 450,000 | 0.045 | 350 | 2.38 |
Figure 5The (a) experimental setup (b) schematic diagram of the E-Jet printing process.
Figure 6Schematic diagram of pulse waveform in terms of voltage across time duration.
Figure 7The (a) formation and evolution of electrojet in space to print on PET substrate by increasing time intervals (b) micro-dripping regime when no voltage at needle (c) cone-jet regime.
Figure 8The DoD E-Jet printing of micro-droplets on flexible PET substrates (a,b) using functional liquid of SEMICOSIL988/1K.
Figure 9The unstable printed drops under 40 kPa pressure using functional liquid of SEMICOSIL988/1K.
Figure 10The printing of linear patterns on flexible PET substrates using functional liquid of UF3808 (a) “DLUT” pattern (b) “Little house” pattern.