| Literature DB >> 35808583 |
Zenghui Yang1, Haihua Wu1, Renjing Zhang1, Kaixin Deng1, Yan Li1, Zhi Liu1, Qiang Zhong1, Yi Kang1.
Abstract
Wave-absorbing materials are developing in the direction of "light weight, wide frequency band, thin layer and high strength", and it is difficult to achieve the synergy between wave-absorbing performance and mechanical properties when graphene absorbent is compounded with a single resin matrix. In this paper, based on the preparation of a new composite absorbing wire with a graphene (GR)/spherical graphite (SG) double absorbent and polylactic acid (PLA)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) double matrix, we proposed a new method to prepare samples for testing the electromagnetic parameters and tensile strength by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Furthermore, the effect of SG/GR ratio on the microwave absorbing properties and mechanical properties of PLA/TPU composites was specifically studied. It was found that when the ratio of SG/GR was small (0:5, 1:4), the dielectric loss (interfacial polarization loss, dipole polarization loss, conductivity loss) and attenuation ability of the composites were stronger, and the impedance matching was better. When the SG/GR ratio was large (5:0, 4:1), the composites had high strength and toughness. When the ratio of SG/GR was moderate (2:3, 3:2), it could retain the absorbing and mechanical properties of the absorbing materials. On the one hand, the SG and PLA/TPU matrix formed an "island structure", which improves the dispersion of GR; on the other hand, the GR and PLA/TPU matrix formed a "core-shell structure", which promotes polarization and multiple scattering.Entities:
Keywords: FDM; PLA/TPU composites; graphene/spherical graphite ratio; mechanical property; microwave absorption performance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808583 PMCID: PMC9268992 DOI: 10.3390/polym14132538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Raw material.
| Name | Trademark | Preparation Method/Average Particle Size | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | 4032D | The average particle size is 62 μm | NatureWorks Inc. (Minnetonka, MN, USA). |
| TPU | 5377A | The average particle size is 114 μm | Bayer company (Leverkusen, Germany) |
| SG | - | Coarse crushing, trimming, magnetic separation and high-temperature purification of natural flake graphite. | Qingdao Xinghe graphite company (Qingdao, China) |
| GR | - | Graphite oxidation reduction process | Yichang Xincheng graphite company (Yichang, China) |
Experimental instruments.
| Name | Model | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| Electrothermal constant-temperature blast drying oven | BPG-43BG | Guangzhou Bilang instrument Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) |
| Horizontal planetary ball mill | QM-WX4 | Nanjing Nanda Instrument Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) |
| Single screw extruder | SHSJ-25 | Dongguan Songhu machinery Co., Ltd. (Dongguan, China) |
| Double nozzle printer | Allcct Tank | Wuhan Allcct Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) |
Figure 1(a) SG/GR/PLA/TPU composite wire; (b) electromagnetic parameter sample; (c) tensile specimens of A1~A6 composites.
Composition of SG/GR/PLA/TPU composite wires.
| Number | Name | Content (wt%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio | SG | GR | PLA | TPU | Ratio | ||
| A1 | 5% SG/PLA/TPU | 5:0 | 5 | 0 | 85.5 | 9.5 | 9:1 |
| A2 | (4% SG + 1% GR)/PLA/TPU | 4:1 | 4 | 1 | 85.5 | 9.5 | 9:1 |
| A3 | (3% SG + 2% GR)/PLA/TPU | 3:2 | 3 | 2 | 85.5 | 9.5 | 9:1 |
| A4 | (2% SG + 3% GR)/PLA/TPU | 2:3 | 2 | 3 | 85.5 | 9.5 | 9:1 |
| A5 | (1% SG + 4% GR)/PLA/TPU | 1:4 | 1 | 4 | 85.5 | 9.5 | 9:1 |
| A6 | 5% GR/PLA/TPU | 0:5 | 0 | 5 | 85.5 | 9.5 | 9:1 |
Testing and characterization methods of material properties.
| Name | Model | Manufacturer | Test Parameters and Scope | Characterization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific surface and aperture analyzer | Novatouch | Quantachrome (Boynton Beach, FL, USA) | Accuracy of pressure sensor < 0.1%. The A/D converter signal resolution reaches 24 bit. | Specific surface area and pore diameter of GR |
| Laser particle size analyzer | S3500 | Microtrac, America (Montgomeryville, PA, USA) | Measuring range: 0.02–2000 μm. Analysis accuracy: error ≤ 0.6%. Repeatability: error ≤ 1%. | Particle size distribution of SG |
| Field scanning electron microscope | JSM-7500F | Japan electronics Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) | Resolution: 1.0 nm (15 KV), 1.4 nm (1 KV). Magnification: 250–1,000,000 times. | Microstructure of SG, GR and their composite powders |
| Field high resolution transmission electron microscope | JEOL-F200 | Japan electronics Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) | Resolution: 0.10 nm (TEM mode), 0.14 nm (STEM mode). Magnification: 20–2,000,000 times. | Lattice structure of GR |
| Fourier transform infrared spectrometer | Spectrum 100 | Perkin Elmer, America (Waltham, MA, USA) | The wave number is in the range of 4000~450 cm−1. | Chemical structure and functional groups of SG and GR |
| X-ray diffractomer | Ultima IVXRD | Japan Neo-Confucianism Corporation (Tokyo, Japan) | With copper target Ka ray, scanning speed 5 (°)/min, step distance 0.02°, diffraction scanning angle 2θ = 5~80°. | Element composition and crystal type of composites |
| Laser confocal Raman spectrometer | Thermo Scientific DXR | Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) | Raman shift is in the range of 100~3500 cm−1. | Graphitization degree of composites |
| Vector network analyzer | R&S ZNA | Rhodes & Schwartz Co., Ltd. (Munich, Germany) | Test the electromagnetic parameters of coaxial ring at 2~18 GHz. | Electromagnetic properties of composites |
| Electro mechanical universal testing machines | 5569 | Instron, America (Norwood, MA, USA) | The tensile rate is 2 mm/min, and each group of tensile samples is measured for 3 times and averaged. | Tensile strength and elongation at break of composites |
Figure 2(a) SEM of SG powder; (b) SEM of GR powder; (c) TEM of GR powder; (d) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of GR powder.
Figure 3Particle size distribution diagram of SG powder.
Figure 4Fourier infrared spectra of SG and GR powders.
Figure 5Six SG/GR/PLA/TPU composites with different contents: (a) XRD; (b) Raman spectrum.
Figure 6Electromagnetic parameters of six kinds of SG/GR/PLA/TPU composites with different contents: (a) real part of permittivity; (b) imaginary part of permittivity; (c) tangent dielectric loss.
Figure 7Cole–Cole curves of A1~A6 composites.
Figure 8Variation curves of reflectivity with frequency of A1~A6 composites with different thicknesses.
Figure 9A1~A6 composites: (a) the curve of reflectivity with frequency at 3 mm thickness; (b) curve of attenuation constant with frequency.
Figure 10|Δ| value of A1~A6 composites.
Figure 11Tensile strength of A1~A6 composites.
Figure 12Elongation at break of A1~A6 composites.
Figure 13SEM diagram of A1~A6 composite powders: (a) 5% SG/PLA/TPU; (b) (4% SG + 1% GR)/PLA/TPU; (c) (3% SG + 2% GR)/PLA/TPU; (d) (2% SG + 3% GR)/PLA/TPU; (e) (1% SG + 4% GR)/PLA/TPU; (f) 5% GR/PLA/TPU.
Comparison of properties between carbon-based absorbent particles and resin matrix composites in recent years.
| Material | Absorbent | Matrix | Content | Absorption Maximum/dB | Tensile Strength/MPa | Elongation at Break/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |