| Literature DB >> 35808542 |
Zixin Huang1,2,3,4, Xinpeng Li1, Jiarun Wang1, Yi Zhang1, Jingfu Mei1.
Abstract
Soft sensing technologies offer promising prospects in the fields of soft robots, wearable devices, and biomedical instruments. However, the structural design, fabrication process, and sensing algorithm design of the soft devices confront great difficulties. In this paper, a soft tactile actuator (STA) with both the actuation function and sensing function is presented. The tactile physiotherapy finger of the STA was fabricated by a fluid silica gel material. Before pulse detection, the tactile physiotherapy finger was actuated to the detection position by injecting compressed air into its chamber. The pulse detecting algorithm, which realized the pulse detection function of the STA, is presented. Finally, in actual pulse detection experiments, the pulse values of the volunteers detected by using the STA and by employing a professional pulse meter were close, which illustrates the effectiveness of the pulse detecting algorithm of the STA.Entities:
Keywords: pulse detecting algorithm; soft sensing technology; soft tactile actuator
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808542 PMCID: PMC9269831 DOI: 10.3390/s22135047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Finished product of the STA.
Figure 2Injection molding process of the upper mold.
Figure 3Unsealed finger.
Figure 4Injection molding process of the base mold.
Figure 5Tactile physiotherapy finger.
Figure 6Experimental platform of the STA.
Position training results of the STA.
| 0.09 | 0.036 | 0.90 |
| 0.10 | 0.040 | 2.50 |
| 0.11 | 0.044 | 2.35 |
| 0.12 | 0.048 | 2.55 |
| 0.13 | 0.052 | 2.90 |
| 0.14 | 0.056 | 3.10 |
| 0.15 | 0.060 | 3.40 |
| 0.16 | 0.064 | 3.50 |
| 0.17 | 0.068 | 3.75 |
| 0.18 | 0.072 | 4.15 |
| 0.19 | 0.076 | 4.40 |
| 0.20 | 0.080 | 4.60 |
| 0.21 | 0.084 | 4.90 |
| 0.22 | 0.088 | 5.20 |
| 0.23 | 0.092 | 5.30 |
| 0.24 | 0.096 | 5.55 |
| 0.25 | 0.010 | 5.90 |
Figure 7Picture of pulse detection with the STA.
Figure 8Stress data of volunteer A.
Figure 9Filtering process using sliding window.
Figure 10Comparison of the binary sequences and the filtered binary sequences within .
Pulse detection results of the volunteers.
|
| A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | 66 | 74 | 75 | 72 |
| 2 | 65 | 66 | 74 | 78 | 71 |
| 3 | 66 | 67 | 73 | 80 | 74 |
| 4 | 63 | 63 | 74 | 76 | 74 |
| 5 | 64 | 69 | 72 | 78 | 75 |
Comparison of the pulse values of the volunteers detected by using STA and by employing a professional pulse meter.
| Volunteer |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A | 65 | 65 |
| B | 66 | 68 |
| C | 74 | 74 |
| D | 77 | 78 |
| E | 74 | 75 |