| Literature DB >> 35808182 |
Gerardo H Martinez-Delgado1, Alfredo J Correa-Balan1, José A May-Chan1, Carlos E Parra-Elizondo1, Luis A Guzman-Rangel2, Antonio Martinez-Torteya3.
Abstract
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) has become an important risk assessment tool when diagnosing illnesses related to heart health. HRV is typically measured with an electrocardiogram; however, there are multiple studies that use Photoplethysmography (PPG) instead. Measuring HRV with video is beneficial as a non-invasive, hands-free alternative and represents a more accessible approach. We developed a methodology to extract HRV from video based on face detection algorithms and color augmentation. We applied this methodology to 45 samples. Signals obtained from PPG and video recorded an average mean error of less than 1 bpm when measuring the heart rate of all subjects. Furthermore, utilizing PPG and video, we computed 61 variables related to HRV. We compared each of them with three correlation metrics (i.e., Kendall, Pearson, and Spearman), adjusting them for multiple comparisons with the Benjamini-Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate and to retrieve the q-value when considering statistical significance lower than 0.5. Using these methods, we found significant correlations for 38 variables (e.g., Heart Rate, 0.991; Mean NN Interval, 0.990; and NN Interval Count, 0.955) using time-domain, frequency-domain, and non-linear methods.Entities:
Keywords: Heart Rate Variability (HRV); Photoplethysmography (PPG); face imaging; heart rate measurement; non-contact
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808182 PMCID: PMC9269597 DOI: 10.3390/s22134690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Flowchart depicting pulse oximeter and video processing to generate the datasets that will be used to compute performance metrics.
Figure 2(a) Frame from original video taken from camera; (b) cropped frame according to ROI; (c) image cropped left side of face; (d) blurred frame caused by sudden movements.
Figure 3(a) Raw PPG signal; (b) red channel of the color-augmented video signal; (c) half-minute interval of the raw PPG signal; (d) half-minute interval of the color-augmented video signal.
Figure 4(a) Raw PPG signal with peak detection; (b) color-augmented video with peak detection; (c) half-minute interval of the raw PPG signal with peak detection; (d) half-minute interval of the color-augmented video with peak detection.
Metric computation for heart rate.
| Me (bpm) | SD (bpm) | RMSE (bpm) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8084 | 7.7758 | 1.0971 |
Metric computation for heart rate minute by minute.
| Minute Interval | Me in bpm (SD) |
|---|---|
| 0:00–0:59 | 2.5308 (3.5017) |
| 1:00–1:59 | 2.0444 (2.2049) |
| 2:00–2:59 | 1.7841 (1.7617) |
| 3:00–3:59 | 1.9370 (2.1008) |
| 4:00–4:59 | 1.6222 (1.4815) |
| 5:00–5:59 | 1.6500 (1.4966) |
| 6:00–6:59 | 1.6667 (1.7965) |
| 7:00–7:59 | 1.5333 (1.8165) |
| 8:00–8:59 | 1.8667 (1.5609) |
| 9:00–9:59 | 1.9333 (2.0158) |
Top five features according to the Pearson correlation test.
| Feature | Method | r | q-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate | Time-domain | 0.991 | 2.71 × 10−34 |
| Mean NN Interval | Time-domain | 0.990 | 1.85 × 10−33 |
| NN Interval Count | Time-domain | 0.955 | 4.44 × 10−21 |
| Logarithmic VL Frequency Power | Frequency-domain | 0.653 | 3.57 × 10−5 |
| Absolute VL Frequency Power | Frequency-domain | 0.652 | 3.57 × 10−5 |
Top five features according to the Kendall correlation test.
| Feature | Method | r | q-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate | Time-domain | 0.934 | 5.09 × 10−16 |
| Mean NN Interval | Time-domain | 0.919 | 8.18 × 10−16 |
| NN Interval Count | Time-domain | 0.879 | 1.44 × 10−14 |
| Logarithmic VL Frequency Power | Frequency-domain | 0.507 | 3.93 × 10−5 |
| Absolute VL Frequency Power | Frequency-domain | 0.507 | 3.93 × 10−5 |
Top five features according to the Spearman correlation test.
| Feature | Method | r | q-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate | Time-domain | 0.990 | 8.27 × 10−34 |
| Mean NN Interval | Time-domain | 0.987 | 2.55 × 10−31 |
| NN Interval Count | Time-domain | 0.962 | 1.43 × 10−22 |
| Logarithmic VL Frequency Power | Frequency-domain | 0.624 | 1.21 × 10−4 |
| Absolute VL Frequency Power | Frequency-domain | 0.624 | 1.21 × 10−4 |
Significant features regarding time-domain methods.
| # of Feature | Feature |
|---|---|
| 1 | Heart Rate |
| 2 | Root Mean Square of Successive NN Interval Differences |
| 3 | SD of NN intervals |
| 4 | Percentage of Successive NN Intervals that differ by more than 20 ms |
| 5 | Successive NN Intervals that differ by more than 50 ms |
| 6 | NN interval count |
| 7 | Minimum NN interval |
| 8 | Mean NN interval |
| 9 | Mean Difference of Successive NN intervals |
Significant features regarding frequency-domain using the Welch method.
| # of Feature | Feature |
|---|---|
| 1 | Peak VL Frequency Power |
| 2 | Absolute VL Frequency Power |
| 3 | Relative VL Frequency Power |
| 4 | Logarithmic VL Frequency Power |
| 5 | Absolute L Frequency Power |
| 6 | Logarithmic L Frequency Power |
| 7 | Logarithmic H Frequency Power |
Significant features in frequency-domain using the autoregressive method.
| # of Feature | Feature |
|---|---|
| 1 | Absolute VL Frequency Power |
| 2 | Relative VL Frequency Power |
| 3 | Logarithmic VL Frequency Power |
| 4 | Logarithmic L Frequency Power |
| 5 | Absolute L Frequency Power |
| 6 | Absolute H Frequency Power |
| 7 | Relative H Frequency Power |
| 8 | Logarithmic H Frequency Power |
Significant features in frequency-domain using the Lomg–Scargle method.
| # of Feature | Feature |
|---|---|
| 1 | Peak VL Frequency Power |
| 2 | Absolute VL Frequency Power |
| 3 | Relative VL Frequency Power |
| 4 | Logarithmic L Frequency Power |
| 5 | Absolute L Frequency Power |
| 6 | Absolute H Frequency Power |
| 7 | Relative H Frequency Power |
| 8 | Logarithmic H Frequency Power |
| 9 | Peak H Frequency Power |
Significant features from non-linear methods.
| # of Feature | Feature |
|---|---|
| 1 | SD perpendicular to the line of identity (SD1) |
| 2 | SD along the line of identity (SD2) |
| 3 | SD1 to SD2 ratio |
Results of comparison with previous methods.
| Citation | Me in bpm (SD) | RMSE (bpm) |
|---|---|---|
| Li et al., 2014 [ | 7.14 (9.53) | 12.47 |
| Lam et al., 2015 [ | 6.49 (8.54) | 10.34 |
| Feng et al., 2015 [ | 6.64 (8.01) | 10.12 |
| Haque et al., 2016 [ | 4.69 (3.43) | 5.96 |
| Song et al., 2020 [ | 5.98 (7.31) | 7.45 |
| Hsu et al., 2020 [ | −2.07 (4.23) | 3.08 |
| Proposed | 0.81 (7.77) | 1.10 |