| Literature DB >> 35808138 |
Kayrat K Kadyrzhanov1, Artem L Kozlovskiy1,2,3, Kamila Egizbek1,2, Inesh E Kenzhina2,4, Rauan Sh Abdinov3, Maxim V Zdorovets1,2,5.
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a study of the change in the stability of Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites when exposed to aggressive media over a long period of time. The main purpose of these studies is to investigate the mechanisms of degradation and corrosion processes occurring in Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites, as well as the influence of the phase composition on the properties and degradation resistance. According to the X-ray phase analysis, it was found that the variation of the initial components leads to the formation of mixed composition nanocomposites with different Fe2O3/NdFeO3 phase ratios. During corrosion tests, it was found that the dominance of the NdFeO3 phase in the composition of nanocomposites leads to a decrease in the degradation and amorphization rate of nanostructures by a factor of 1.5-2 compared to structures in which the Fe2O3 phase dominates. Such a difference in the degradation processes indicates the high stability of two-phase composites. Moreover, in the case of an aqueous medium, nanocomposites dominated by the NdFeO3 phase are practically not subjected to corrosion and deterioration of properties. The results obtained helped to determine the resistance of Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites to degradation processes caused by exposure to aggressive media, as well as to determine the mechanisms of property changes in the process of degradation. The results of the study of the absorption capacity of Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites in the case of the purification of aqueous media from manganese and arsenic showed that a change in the phase ratio in nanocomposites leads to an increase in the absorption efficiency of pollutants from aqueous media.Entities:
Keywords: doping; iron oxide; nanocomposites; phase transformations; purification of aqueous media
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808138 PMCID: PMC9267972 DOI: 10.3390/nano12132302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1X-ray diffractograms of Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites depending on the components ratio.
Figure 2(a) Phase diagram of Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites. (b) Graph of the change in the degree of crystallinity of Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites depending on the components content.
Data of crystal lattice parameters.
| Phase | Lattice Parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration of Nd2O3 in Nanocomposites | |||||
| 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | |
| A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | |
| Fe2O3, Hexagonal, R-3c(167) | a = 4.9843 ± 0.0014 Å, | a = 4.9922 ± 0.0024 Å, b = 13.7017 ± 0.0015 Å, V = 295.73 Å3 | a = 4.9971 ± 0.0021 Å, c = 13.7259 ± 0.0015 Å, V = 296.83 Å3 | a = 5.0118 ± 0.0017 Å, c = 13.7744 ± 0.0021 Å, V = 299.22 Å3 | a = 5.0285 ± 0.0022 Å, c = 13.7744 ± 0.0015 Å, V = 301.63 Å3 |
| NdFeO3, | a = 5.5547 ± 0.0015 Å, b = 7.7391 ± 0.0014 Å, c = 5.4329 ± 0.0021 Å, V = 233.55 Å3 | a = 5.5459 ± 0.0016 Å, b = 7.7313 ± 0.0022 Å, c = 5.4168 ± 0.0027 Å, V = 232.25 Å3 | a = 5.5317 ± 0.0021 Å, b = 7.7089 ± 0.0024 Å, c = 5.4051 ± 0.0022Å, V = 230.48 Å3 | a = 5.5198 ± 0.0022 Å, b = 7.6889 ± 0.0017 Å, c = 5.3934 ± 0.0024 Å, V = 228.90 Å3 | a = 5.5382 ± 0.0013 Å, b = 7.6745 ± 0.0012 Å, c = 5.3830 ± 0.0016 Å, V = 226.48 Å3 |
|
| |||||
| Fe2O3, Hexagonal, R-3c(167) | 88.2 ± 2.5 | 73.6 ± 2.4 | 57.3 ± 2.4 | 47.3 ± 2.1 | 22.3 ± 2.3 |
| NdFeO3, | 11.8 ± 2.6 | 26.4 ± 2.1 | 42.7 ± 2.6 | 52.7 ± 2.5 | 77.7 ± 2.3 |
Figure 3SEM images of the studied Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites: (a) A1; (b) A2; (c) A3; (d) A4; (e) A5.
Figure 4Results of grain size measurements by different methods.
Figure 5Results of mass changes of samples during corrosion tests in different media: (a) 1M NaOH; (b) 0.1 M HCl; (c) water.
Figure 6(a) Example of oxide growths formation on Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites surface (Nd2O3 = 0.1) as a result of corrosion processes in 1 M NaOH medium. (b) Example of pitting corrosion in Fe2O3/NdFeO3 nanocomposites (Nd2O3 = 0.1) after 10 days in 0.1 M HCl medium.
Figure 7(a) Results of sample mass change during corrosion after 10 days. (b) Results of corrosion resistance evaluation depending on the phase composition of nanoparticles.
Figure 8(a) Absorption efficiency results for manganese and arsenic. (b) Absorption efficiency results as a function of phase composition. (c) Absorption efficiency dynamics as a function of number of consecutive cycles for manganese purification. (d) Absorption efficiency dynamics as a function of number of consecutive cycles for arsenic purification.