| Literature DB >> 35808088 |
Andrea Orsini1, Daniele Barettin1, Federica Ercoli2, Maria Cristina Rossi2, Sara Pettinato1,3, Stefano Salvatori1,3, Alessio Mezzi4, Riccardo Polini3,5, Alessandro Bellucci3, Matteo Mastellone3, Marco Girolami3, Veronica Valentini3, Stefano Orlando3, Daniele Maria Trucchi3.
Abstract
Black diamond is an emerging material for solar applications. The femtosecond laser surface treatment of pristine transparent diamond allows the solar absorptance to be increased to values greater than 90% from semi-transparency conditions. In addition, the defects introduced by fs-laser treatment strongly increase the diamond surface electrical conductivity and a very-low activation energy is observed at room temperature. In this work, the investigation of electronic transport mechanisms of a fs-laser nanotextured diamond surface is reported. The charge transport was studied down to cryogenic temperatures, in the 30-300 K range. The samples show an activation energy of a few tens of meV in the highest temperature interval and for T < 50 K, the activation energy diminishes to a few meV. Moreover, thanks to fast cycles of measurement, we noticed that the black-diamond samples also seem to show a behavior close to ferromagnetic materials, suggesting electron spin influence over the transport properties. The mentioned properties open a new perspective in designing novel diamond-based biosensors and a deep knowledge of the charge-carrier transport in black diamond becomes fundamental.Entities:
Keywords: LIPSS; activation energy; black diamond; cryogenic temperatures; electric conductivity; variable range hopping
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808088 PMCID: PMC9268584 DOI: 10.3390/nano12132253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1A 3D-view of the two separate boustrophedic fs-laser treatments of the diamond surface. The LIPSS nano-waves’ direction is orthogonal to the light polarization and their thickness is about half a micron. In the lower figure, the larger optical absorbance of the diamond surface after the second treatment is evidenced due to the increased defects’ densities [22].
Figure 2Top view of the central area of samples 2T-9010 (panels (a,b)) and 2T-8020 (panels (c,d)).
Figure 3Surface characterization of BD samples: XPS (panels (a–c) and Raman (panel (d))).
Figure 4Measured resistance of sample 2T-9010 during the characterization performed following the Van der Pauw method. (a) Current injected at contacts 1–2; (b) current injected at contacts 2–3; (c) current injected at contacts 3–4; (d) current injected at contacts 4–1. The figure relative to the second cycle of both samples is represented on logarithmic y-axes in order to have eye-evidence over the NTC → PTC transition.
Resistance values measured at the highest (300 K) and the lowest (30 K) temperature during the four stages of current injection.
| Stage | Injection Points | 8020 @ 30 K | 8020 @ RT | 9010 @ 30 K | 9010 @ RT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I → 1–2 | 102 MΩ | 2.3 MΩ | 53 MΩ | 2.5 MΩ |
| 2 | I → 2–3 | 31 MΩ | 210 kΩ1 | 15.2 MΩ | 300 kΩ |
| 3 | I → 3–4 | 18 MΩ | 450 kΩ1 | 2.65 MΩ | 350 kΩ |
| 4 | I → 4–1 | 5.3 MΩ | 480 kΩ1 | 2.6 MΩ | 580 kΩ |
Figure 5Resistance of sample 2T-8020 at different contacts: (a) current injected at contacts 1–2; (b) current injected at contacts 2–3; (c) current injected at contacts 3–4; (d) current injected at contacts 4–1. The figure relative to the second cycle is represented on logarithmic y-axes in order to have eye-evidence over the NTC → PTC transition.
Temperature and resistance values at the moment of metal–insulator transition of the samples and of the insulator–semiconductor back transition.
| MEASUREMENT | Stage | Temperature (K) | Resistance (kΩ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2T-9010 Cooling | 3 | 74 → 63 | 125–115 |
| 2T-9010 Heating | 3 | 64 → 81 | 168–241 |
| 2T-9010 Cooling | 2 | 248 → 196 | 140–232 |
| 2T-9010 Heating | 2 | 206 → 276 | 134–219 |
| 2T-8020 Cooling | 2 | 98 → 90 | 190–252 |
Figure 6Arrhenius plot of conductance of (a) R12,34 of sample 2T-9010, and (b) R12,34 of sample 2T-8020.
Calculated values for E, E, G, and G following the best fit of data of Figure 5 according to Equation (2).
| MEASUREMENT | 30–50 K | 50K–RT |
|---|---|---|
| 2T-9010 | ||
| 2T-8020 |
Extrapolated possible values for Tc, as resistance maxima in temperature curves.
| MEASUREMENT | Stage | Curie Temperature |
|---|---|---|
| 2T-9010 | 2 | About RT |
| 2T-9010 | 3 | About 130 K |
| 2T-8020 | 2 | About 140 K |
| 2T-8020 | 3 | About 110 K |