| Literature DB >> 35808047 |
Yafei Hou1, Xiaodan Pei2, Yuancheng Wang1, Luyuan Zhang2, Xiaohui Wei1, Hongyan Mao1, Wuduo Zhao3, Shusheng Zhang3, Wenfen Zhang1,4.
Abstract
The aromatic structure and the rich nitrogen content of polymers based on covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTF) and their unique hydrophilic-lipophilic-balanced adsorption properties make them promising candidates for an adsorbent that can be used for sample pretreatment. Herein, a new covalent triazine-based framework (CTF-DBF) synthesized by a Friedel-Crafts reaction was used for the determination of the content of nucleotides in commercial infant formula. It was shown that the synthetic materials had an amorphous microporous structure, a BET surface area of up to 595.59 m2/g, and 0.39 nm and 0.54 nm micropores. The versatile adsorption properties of this material were evaluated by quantum chemistry theory calculations and batch adsorption experiments using five nucleotides as probes. The quantum chemistry results demonstrated that CTF-DBF can participate in multiple interactions with nucleotides. All the analyses performed present good linearity with R2 > 0.9993. The detection limits of targets ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg, the spiked recoveries were between 85.8 and 105.3% and the relative standard deviations (RSD, n = 6) were between 1.1 and 4.5%. All these results suggest that this versatile CTF-DBF has great potential for sample pretreatment.Entities:
Keywords: covalent triazine-based frameworks; nucleotides; solid-phase extraction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808047 PMCID: PMC9268561 DOI: 10.3390/nano12132213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Chemical structural formulas of five nucleotides.
Figure 2Schematic of this work.
Figure 3Characterization of CTF-DBF: (a) SEM; (b)FT-IR; (c) Solid-state 13C NMR; (d) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms; (e) Pore size distribution; (f) TGA.
Figure 4XPS spectra of CTF-DBF: (a) Wide-scan survey spectra; (b) High-resolution C 1s.
Figure 5Theoretical analysis of non-covalent forces.
Figure 6Optimization of solid-phase extraction conditions: (a) Amount of sorbent; (b) Type and composition of eluate; (c) Elution volume; (d) Sample pH; (e) Reused times.
Recovery and precision of 5 different nucleotides (n = 6).
| Analytes | Spiked Level | Detection Value | Recovery | RSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP | 2.0 | 1.76 | 88.2 | 2.1 |
| 10.0 | 9.17 | 91.7 | 1.7 | |
| 50.0 | 45.15 | 90.3 | 3.4 | |
| UMP | 1.0 | 0.87 | 87.6 | 4.3 |
| 5.0 | 5.11 | 102.1 | 2.2 | |
| 25.0 | 26.15 | 104.6 | 3.1 | |
| IMP | 1.0 | 0.86 | 85.8 | 2.6 |
| 5.0 | 4.36 | 87.2 | 1.1 | |
| 25.0 | 22.10 | 88.4 | 3.5 | |
| AMP | 2.0 | 1.76 | 88.1 | 4.5 |
| 10.0 | 10.53 | 105.3 | 3.4 | |
| 50.0 | 51.35 | 102.7 | 2.7 | |
| GMP | 2.0 | 1.73 | 86.6 | 2.4 |
| 10.0 | 8.71 | 87.1 | 2.2 | |
| 50.0 | 44.71 | 89.4 | 1.6 |
Contents of five nucleotides in real samples.
| Sample No | CMP | UMP | IMP | AMP | GMP | Total Content (mg/kg) | Labeled Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69.7 | 39.5 | 26.1 | 47.6 | 13.4 | 196.3 | 197 |
| 2 | 84.2 | 70.6 | 17.8 | 51.6 | 17.4 | 241.6 | 240 |
| 3 | 61.5 | 36.2 | 16.7 | 24.1 | 13.5 | 152.0 | 150 |
| 4 | 79.1 | 63.8 | 25.4 | 44.7 | 15.8 | 228.8 | 230 |
| 5 | 123.2 | 82.4 | 21.3 | 53.5 | 17.6 | 298.0 | 300 |
| 6 | 57.8 | 41.7 | 15.1 | 25.5 | 13.5 | 153.6 | 153 |
| 7 | 117.5 | 77.6 | 18.6 | 64.5 | 20.3 | 298.5 | 300 |
| 8 | 98.1 | 65.7 | 19.8 | 48.2 | 17.9 | 249.7 | 250 |