| Literature DB >> 35808014 |
M Somasundaram1, Narendra Kumar Uttamchand1, A Raja Annamalai2, Chun-Ping Jen3,4.
Abstract
This review paper gives an insight into the microstructural, mechanical, biological, and corrosion resistance of spark plasma sintered magnesium (Mg) composites. Mg has a mechanical property similar to natural human bones as well as biodegradable and biocompatible properties. Furthermore, Mg is considered a potential material for structural and biomedical applications. However, its high affinity toward oxygen leads to oxidation of the material. Various researchers optimize the material composition, processing techniques, and surface modifications to overcome this issue. In this review, effort has been made to explore the role of process techniques, especially applying a typical powder metallurgy process and the sintering technique called spark plasma sintering (SPS) in the processing of Mg composites. The effect of reinforcement material on Mg composites is illustrated well. The reinforcement's homogeneity, size, and shape affect the mechanical properties of Mg composites. The evidence shows that Mg composites exhibit better corrosion resistance, as the reinforcement act as a cathode in a Mg matrix. However, in most cases, a localized corrosion phenomenon is observed. The Mg composite's high corrosion rate has adversely affected cell viability and promotes cytotoxicity. The reinforcement of bioactive material to the Mg matrix is a potential method to enhance the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of the materials. However, the impact of SPS process parameters on the final quality of the Mg composite needs to be explored.Entities:
Keywords: biocompatibility; corrosion; magnesium composites; mechanical properties; spark plasma sintering (SPS)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808014 PMCID: PMC9268439 DOI: 10.3390/nano12132178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Schematic representation of (a) Spark plasma sintering; (b) Comparison between SPS and conventional sintering; (c) D.C. pulse current between particles (adapted) [47].
Process parameters of conventional compaction and sintering of Mg composite.
| S. No. | Type of PM | Mesh | Mixing/Blending | Compaction | Sintering | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mg-SiCp | Mg—0.23 mm, | Ball milling | 100 Tons Hydraulic press, | Solid-state sintering | [ |
| 2 | AZ91D (92%), Tugsten carbide (2, 4, 6%), Graphite (6, 4, 2%) | Up to 50 microns | Ball milling | Pressure 200 N/mm2 | 500 °C at an increased heating rate of 5 °C/min | [ |
| 3 | Mg-3Zn-1Ca and Nb | Zinc, Niobium, Mg—325 mesh Calcium—6 mesh | Ball milling | Hydraulic press | Two-step sintering at 380 °C and 610 °C | [ |
| 4 | Magnesium and | Mg—50 to 290 microns | High energy ball milling | Hydraulic press attached in the universal testing machine | Muffle furnace | [ |
| 5 | Mg (80 wt %), Zn (19 wt %), | Ball milling | 50 tons, 35 mm dia and | No sintering | [ | |
| 6 | Pure Mg and | 60–300 microns | In planetary ball milling machine without the ball; | Pressure 960 N/mm2 | Hybrid Microwave sintering (1.1 kW, 2.45 GHz by | [ |
| 7 | AZ91D and | AZ91D—10 and | High-energy ball milling | - | - | [ |
| 8 | Mg (99% pure) with irregular shape | 80 microns | Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles were extracted from the bovine bone | The cylindrical mold of 8 mm dia The pressure of 350 MPa and maintain it for | 250 °C for 2 h and then to 550 °C for another 2 h in a vacuum furnace (1 × 10−4 Torr) | [ |
| 9 | Mg and naphthalene particle | Mg—85 to 100 microns | - | Uniaxially pressed at 125 MPa | Heated in a hot air oven at 120 °C for 24 h to sublime naphthalene. Afterwards, the samples were sintered at 550 °C for 2 h under argon atmosphere | [ |
| 10 | Mg, Ta, Nb | Mg—60 to 220 microns | Planetary ball mill PM 400-Retsch; | Uniaxially pressed at a pressure of 760 MPa | sintered at | [ |
| 11 | Mg, Fe, Zn, Ca granular, | - | - | Uniaxially pressed by using a hydraulic press at a pressure of 90 MPa for 2 min; diameter 36 mm and thickness 6 mm | Tubular furnace under controlled high-purity argon atmosphere. | [ |
Mechanical properties of spark plasma-sintered Mg composite.
| Type of PM | Mesh | Mixing/Blending of Powder | Die/Sample Size | Compaction Pressure (MPa) | Sintering Temperature, Time (°C and min) | Composition | CYS (MPa) | UCS | Failure Strain (%) | Hardness | Yield Strength (MPa) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | E | Fracture Toughness MPa.m 1/2 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZK61 alloy/rGO nanoplatelets | 75 microns | diameter 20 mm | 60 | 520, 6 | 0.5 rGO/ZK61 (X/Y) | 143 | 368 | 11.7 | 69.5 | - | - | - | - | [ | |
| 0.5 rGO/ZK61 (Z) | 147 | 438 | 19.5 | 70.2 | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| AZ91 alloy/Ti powder | Mg < 74 microns | Ball milling; | diameter 25 mm | 75 | 500, 20 | AZ91-5Ti | 185 | 442.2 | 25.3 | - | - | - | - | - | [ |
| AZ91-10Ti | 206.2 | 437 | 24.4 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| AZ91-15Ti | 255.6 | 439 | 21.8 | - | |||||||||||
| Mg powder (purity 99.50%); Nano-HAP (purity 95%) | Mg = 180 microns | Planetary ball milling; 500 RPM for 10 min; argon atm | 50 | 500, 10 | Mg—10HA | 207.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | [ | |
| Mg—12HA | 137.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| Mg powder 99.88%; Zn powder 99.99%; HAP powder 98.5% | Mg =75–150 microns; Zn = 23 microns; HA < 60 microns | GN-2 High energy ball milling; agate balls of 2:1 ratio; 400 RPM | Die dimensions Height = 40 mm; inner dia = 30 mm; outer dia = 50 mm | 40 | 390, 5 min | Zn–10Mg | 161 | - | - | - | - | - | 4.78 | 48.3 | [ |
| Mg–5.5Zn–5HAp | 115 | - | - | - | - | - | 4.66 | 31.9 | |||||||
| Two-layered | 222 | - | - | - | - | - | 7.11 | 55.2 | |||||||
| Three-layered | 235.3 | - | - | - | - | - | 7.86 | 69.7 | |||||||
| Mg powder (99%); Zn powder (99.8%); HAP nanopowder of cylindrical shape | Mg = 130 ± 15 microns; Zn = 30 ± 5 microns; HA = height 180 ± 20 nm; dia 83 ± 8 nm | Wet precipitation method | Grade 2333 graphite | 80 | Two-stage sintering; 450, 5 and 500, 5 | Mg-3Zn/5HA | - | 230.1 ± 5.9 | 14.6 | - | 111.8 ± 3.2 | - | - | 126.8 J/m3 | [ |
| Mg-3Zn/10HA | - | 242 ± 2.7 | 16.1 | - | 120.1 ± 3.9 | - | - | 165.8 | |||||||
| Mg-3Zn/15HA | - | 257.3 ± 5.4 | 17.5 | - | 131.7 ± 2.6 | - | - | 143.7 | |||||||
| Mg-3Zn/20HA | - | 207.2 ± 4.3 | 13.2 | - | 97.5 ± 1.8 | - | - | 89.2 | |||||||
| ZK61/x βTCP | ZK61—45–75 μm; | Ball milling for 10 h with 5 min pause time of every 30 min at 400 RPM with a ratio of 2:1 | Dia 30 mm × 20 mm | 40 | 500 | ZK61/5βTCP | - | 338 ± 13 | 19.5 ± 0.6 | - | - | - | 10.51 | - | [ |
| ZK61/10βTCP | - | 368 ± 5 | 18.3 ± 0.5 | - | - | - | 10.18 | - | |||||||
| ZK61/15βTCP | - | 402 ± 9 | 17.8 ± 0.3 | - | - | - | 10.67 | - | |||||||
| Mg-Zn/HAP | Mg <150 μm; | Ball milling; 400 RPM at 3 h in argon atmosphere; ball to powder ratio of 4:1 | Graphite dia of 20 mm | 40 | 480, 5 min | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | [ |
Note: HA/HAP—Hydroxyapatite; G.O.—Graphene Oxide; Ti—Titanium; Zn—Zinc; βTCP—beta-tricalcium phosphate.
Figure 2Gas atomized WE43 powder: (a) SEM micrograph; (b) SEM/BSE micrograph to show the cross-section [62].
Figure 3SEM images and EDS analysis of Al-xCu powders consisting of various amounts of Cu: (a) x = 20, (b) x = 33 and (c) x = 50 [66].
Figure 4XRD results of Mg, HAP powder, and Mg-xHAP composites (a)XRD pattern; (b) Extended view of Mg-10HAP106 within 40–45° [51].
Figure 5Optical micrographs of (a) Mg-0HAP, (b) Mg-8HAP, (c) Mg-10HAP, and (d) Mg-12HAP, and (e) Mg-10HAP106 after sintering using SPS system [51].
Figure 6Optical micrographs showing the microstructures of samples: (a) ZK61, (b) ZK61/5β-TCP, (c) ZK61/10β-TCP and (d) ZK61/15β-TCP [59].
Figure 7EBSD image of Mg-based composite at different sintering temperature and time [71].
Figure 8The surface morphologies of composites after 15 days in SBF solution after removal of corrosion products: (a–c) ZK61, (d–f) ZK61/5β-TCP, (g–i) ZK61/10β-TCP and (j–l) ZK61/15β-TCP [59].
Corrosion behavior of Mg composites.
| Material | Method of Testing | Sample Size | Atmospheric Condition (°C) | Medium | Duration (h) | Rate of Corrosion (mm/year) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| monolithic Zn–10 Mg and Mg–5.5Zn–5HAp composites | Immersion test (ASTMG31–72) | Ø9 × 7 | 37.0 ± 0.5 | simulated body fluid (SBF) | 72 | 0.69 (Zn–10 Mg) | [ |
| Mg-xHAp composite | Immersion test | 4 × 4 × 8 | 37 | Hank’s solution | 120 (5 days) | HAp improves the rate of corrosion | [ |
| ZK61/xβTCP | Immersion test (ASTMG31–72) | Ø15 × 8 | 37.0 ± 0.2 | 360 (15 days) | 0.3165, 0.3365, 0.3415 mg/cm2/h | [ | |
| Mg-3Zn/rHA or cHA | Potentiodynamic study | 1 cm2 (opening in surface) | 37 ± 1 | m-SBF | 14 days | 5.263 ± 0.26 (Mg-3Zn) | [ |
| Mg–MgF2 and WE43-MgF2 | Immersion test | 1 cm2 | 37 | SBF | 14 days | Mg-MgF2—0.346 ± 0.047 WE43-MgF2—0.875 ± 0.062; | [ |
| Mg–1Al–Cu/xGr | Immersion test | 8 × 6 × 2 mm | 37 | SBF | 10 h | Rate degradation is low in 0.18 Gr, but it increases with Gr | [ |
Figure 9Optical micrograph of L-929 cells cultured in 100% extraction mediums for 72 h (a) ZK61, (b) ZK61/5β-TCP, (c) ZK61/10β-TCP and (d) ZK61/15β-TCP composite [59].