| Literature DB >> 35807698 |
Ilka Engell1, Deborah Linsler1, Mignon Sandor2, Rainer Georg Joergensen3, Catharina Meinen4, Martin Potthoff1.
Abstract
Conservation tillage is often discussed as an effective tool to improve the soil quality in agriculture. Four sites across Europe (in Germany, Romania, Spain, and Sweden) were investigated as case studies for country-specific reductions in tillage intensity. Conventional tillage (CT) by mouldboard ploughing was compared with shallow and deep non-inversion minimum tillage (MT) and/or no-tillage (NT). In Sweden, NT and MT had positive effects on the concentrations of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (N), and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in the upper 20 cm compared with CT. At the German site, MT increased SOC, N, and MBC concentrations in the top 10 cm. In contrast, CT increased MBC contents and bulk density between 20 and 30 cm soil depth. At the Romanian site, soil parameters showed no differences between inverse tillage (CT) and non-inverse tillage (MT), both with a working depth of 25 to 30 cm. At the Spanish site, the use of NT significantly increased the concentrations as well as the stocks of C, N, and MBC compared to CT. In conclusion, reduced tillage improved soil microbial properties in most cases. However, the effectiveness of reduced tillage appears to be highly dependent on site conditions such as pH, soil texture, and climatic conditions.Entities:
Keywords: microbial biomass; minimum tillage; mouldboard ploughing; no-tillage; soil quality
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807698 PMCID: PMC9268763 DOI: 10.3390/plants11131747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Overview of the different tillage treatments at the four field sites; CT = conventional tillage, MT = minimum tillage, NT = no-tillage.
| Site | Tillage | Machinery Used (Working Depth) |
|---|---|---|
| Säby | CT | Mouldboard plough (23 cm) |
| MT | Cultivator (10–12 cm) | |
| NT | Direct seeding without any tillage operations | |
| Garte Süd | CT | Mouldboard plough (25–30 cm), followed by a rotary harrow |
| MT | Rotary harrow (5–8 cm) | |
| Turda | CT | Mouldboard plough (25–30 cm), seedbed preparation by a rotary harrow |
| MT | Chisel processing (25–30 cm) after maize and wheat followed by disk harrow while direct seeding was applied after soybean | |
| La Hampa | CT | Mouldboard plough (25–30 cm) plus cultivator (15–20 cm) and a disc harrow (15 cm) |
| NT | Direct seeding without any tillage operations |
Mean (standard deviation) of bulk density, soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (N) contents at the field sites Säby (n = 3), Garte Süd (n = 4), Turda (n = 3), and La Hampa (n = 3) under different tillage treatments (CT = conventional tillage, MT = minimum tillage, NT = no-tillage) at three soil depths (0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, 20–30 cm).
| Site | Soil Depth | Bulk Density (g cm−3) | SOC (mg g−1 Soil) | Total N (mg g−1 Soil) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (cm) | CT | MT | NT | CT | MT | NT | CT | MT | NT | |
| Säby | 0–10 | 0.97 (0.10) | 1.01 (0.14) | 1.08 (0.16) | 26.67 (1.51) | 30.63 (1.55) | 34.90 (4.19) | 2.33 (0.05) | 2.53 (0.09) | 2.73 (0.19) |
| 10–20 | 1.25 (0.11) | 1.41 (0.12) | 1.50 (0.07) | 27.00 (1.61) | 26.13 (2.76) | 23.53 (1.27) | 2.30 (0.08) a | 2.17 (0.12) ab | 1.97 (0.05) b | |
| 20–30 | 1.33 (0.18) | 1.43 (0.07) | 1.38 (0.13) | 26.73 (2.40) a | 20.17 (3.84) b | 17.67 (3.73) b | 2.20 (0.14) | 1.77 (0.17) | 1.63 (0.21) | |
| Garte Süd | 0–10 | 1.67 (0.12) | 1.66 (0.10) | 14.38 (1.48) b | 18.28 (0.75) a | 1.43 (0.04) b | 1.75 (0.05) a | |||
| 10–20 | 1.63 (0.05) | 1.67 (0.09) | 14.60 (0.99) | 14.80 (0.94) | 1.50 (0.00) | 1.48 (0.04) | ||||
| 20–30 | 1.65 (0.05) b | 1.83 (0.03) a | 14.60 (2.42) | 13.13 (1.61) | 1.40 (0.07) | 1.30 (0.00) | ||||
| Turda | 0–10 | 0.89 (0.00) | 0.85 (0.01) | 22.13 (0.39) | 20.67 (0.60) | 2.13 (0.10) | 2.00 (0.00) | |||
| 10–20 | 0.98 (0.02) | 0.88 (0.02) | 22.53 (0.09) | 20.87 (1.53) | 2.13 (0.10) | 2.00 (0.10) | ||||
| 20–30 | 1.01 (0.04) | 0.90 (0.03) | 22.43 (0.33) | 19.53 (0.90) | 2.13 (0.10) | 1.90 (0.00) | ||||
| La Hampa | 0–10 | 1.18 (0.29) | 1.46 (0.19) | 9.03 (0.48) b | 10.30 (0.62) a | 1.07 (0.05) | 1.20 (0.08) | |||
| 10–20 | 1.29 (0.25) | 1.26 (0.03) | 8.23 (0.54) | 9.13 (0.38) | 0.90 (0.08) | 1.07 (0.05) | ||||
| 20–30 | 1.38 (0.05) | 1.27 (0.16) | 7.77 (0.05) | 7.90 (0.65) | 0.97 (0.05) | 1.00 (0.08) | ||||
Different letters (a, b, ab) indicate a depth and site-specific significant difference between the tillage treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Effect of tillage treatments (CT = Conventional tillage, MT = Minimum tillage, NT = No-tillage) in Germany (n = 4), Romania (n = 3), Spain (n = 3) and Sweden (n = 3) on soil microbial biomass carbon at the soil depths (0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, 20–30 cm) given as means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters (a, b) are significantly (p < 0.05) different from each other at each soil depth. Tillage treatments were carried out in a site-specific way (Table 1).
Mean stocks (standard deviation) of soil organic carbon (SOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) at the four field sites under different tillage treatments; CT = conventional tillage, MT = minimum tillage, NT = no-tillage. Information of tillage techniques are given in Table 1.
| Site | Equivalent Soil Mass | SOC (t ha−1) | MBC (t ha−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (t ha−1 | CT | MT | NT | CT | MT | NT | |
|
Säby ( | 3790 | 108.2 (1.5) | 86.7 (7.4) | 76.5 (13.7) | 0.72 (0.09) | 0.66 (0.04) | 0.68 (0.12) |
|
Garte Süd ( | 5060 | 75.3 (9.7) | 76.2 (5.6) | 1.62 (0.09) | 1.53 (0.13) | ||
|
Turda ( | 2760 | 59.0 (1.4) | 58.8 (2.0) | 0.83 (0.05) | 0.77 (0.04) | ||
|
La Hampa ( | 3790 | 32.5 (1.1) b | 36.0 (1.1) a | 0.78 (0.07) b | 1.04 (0.02) a | ||
Different letters (a, b) indicate a depth and site-specific significant difference between the tillage treatments (p < 0.05).