| Literature DB >> 35807675 |
Gabriela Toro-Tobón1, Fagua Alvarez-Flórez1, Hernán D Mariño-Blanco1, Luz M Melgarejo1.
Abstract
Semi-arid environments characterized by low rainfall are subject to soil desertification processes. These environments have heterogeneous landscapes with patches of vegetation known as resource islands that are generated by nurse species that delay the desertification process because they increase the availability of water and nutrients in the soil. The study aimed to characterize some foliar physiological, biochemical, and anatomical traits of three nurse tree species that form resource islands in the semi-arid environment of La Guajira, Colombia, i.e., Haematoxylum brasiletto, Pithecellobium dulce, and Pereskia guamacho. The results showed that H. brasiletto and P. dulce have sclerophyllous strategies, are thin (0.2 and 0.23 mm, respectively), and have a high leaf dry matter content (364.8 and 437.47 mg/g). Moreover, both species have a high photochemical performance, reaching Fv/Fm values of 0.84 and 0.82 and PIABS values of 5.84 and 4.42, respectively. These results agree with the OJIP curves and JIP parameters. Both species had a compact leaf with a similar dorsiventral mesophyll. On the other hand, P. guamacho has a typical succulent, equifacial leaf with a 97.78% relative water content and 0.81 mm thickness. This species had the lowest Fv/Fm (0.73) and PIABS (1.16) values and OJIP curve but had the highest energy dissipation value (DIo/RC).Entities:
Keywords: chlorophyll a fluorescence; leaf anatomy; leaf physiological traits; nurse trees; pigments
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807675 PMCID: PMC9269082 DOI: 10.3390/plants11131723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Functional traits in leaves of H. brasiletto, P. dulce, and P. guamacho.
| Variable |
|
|
| Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WC (%) | 151.79 ± 10.1 | 121.43 ± 34.87 | 744.59 ± 87.76 | (a, b, c) |
| RWC (%) | 83.46 ± 10.48 | 90.85 ± 4.21 | 97.78 ± 0.61 | (a, b, c) |
| WSD (%) | 16.54 ± 10.49 | 9.15 ± 4.21 | 2.22 ± 0.6 | (a, b, c) |
| LA (cm2) | 3.67 ± 1.56 | 6.91 ± 3.7 | 7.39 ± 1.96 | (a, b, b) |
| SLA (cm2/g) | 134.19 ± 10.88 | 108.88 ± 23.82 | 113.58 ± 38.79 | (a, b, b) |
| LDMC (mg/g) | 364.8 ± 19.97 | 437.47 ± 21.63 | 115.38 ± 13.28 | (a, b, c) |
| Thickness (mm) | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.34 | (a, b, c) |
| pH | 5.17 ± 0.27 | 5.72 ± 0.08 | 5.24 ± 0.32 | (a, b, a) |
| SD (stomata/mm2) | 223.53 ± 55.88 | 647.06 ± 164.7 | 38.06 ± 6.36 | (a, b, c) |
| gs 3:30–5:30 h (mmol·m−2·s−1) | 64.8 ± 20 | 60.6 ± 20.7 | 50.8 ± 24.3 | (a, a, a) |
| gs 12:30–15:00 h (mmol·m−2·s−1) | 45.3 ± 16.55 | 87.6 ± 14.9 | 22 ± 3.3 | (a, b, c) |
| gs 17:30–19:30 h (mmol·m−2·s−1) | 40.6 ± 5.5 | 39.8 ± 6.6 | 35.9 ± 6.9 | (a, ab, c) |
WC: water content; RWC: relative water content; WSD: water saturation deficit; LA: leaf area; SLA: specific leaf area; LDMC: leaf dry mass content. Thickness; pH; SD: stomatal density; gs: stomatal conductance three times throughout the day (3:30–5:30 h, 12:30–15:00 h, and 17:30–19:30 h).
Figure 1Spider-plot showing various parameters obtained from the rapid emission phase of chlorophyll a fluorescence in H. brasiletto, P. dulce, and P. guamacho. Each line represents the average of 7 plants. (A) Specific energy flux parameters (ABS/RC, DIo/RC, Tro/RC, Eto/RC, and REo/RC), quantum efficiencies (ΦPo, ΦEo, and Ψo), and performance index (PIABS). (B) Phenomenological energy flux parameters (ABS/CSo, Dio/Cso, Tro/Cso, Eto/Cso, and REo/CSo).
Parameters obtained from the rapid emission phase of chlorophyll a fluorescence.
| Variable |
|
|
| Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIABS | 5.84 ± 2.19 | 4.42 ± 3.37 | 1.16 ± 0.55 | (a, a, b) |
| ΦPo (Fv/Fm) | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | (a, a, b) |
| ΦEo | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.09 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | (a, b, c) |
| ΨEo | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | (a, b, c) |
| ABS/RC | 1.19 ± 0.22 | 1.24 ± 0.34 | 1.86 ± 0.16 | (a, a, b) |
| DIo/RC | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.5 ± 0.22 | (a, a, b) |
| TRo/RC | 1 ± 0.19 | 1.02 ± 0.26 | 1.35 ± 0.12 | (a, a, b) |
| ETo/RC | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | (ab, b, a) |
| REo/RC | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | (a, b, b) |
| ABS/CSo | 309 ± 58 | 360 ± 101 | 290 ± 108 | (a, b, a) |
| DIo/CSo | 51.45 ± 9.96 | 64.24 ± 22.97 | 84.74 ± 25.94 | (a, b, c) |
| TRo/CSo | 259.78 ± 48.07 | 296.93 ± 72.13 | 224.88 ± 106.8 | (a, a, b) |
| ETo/CSo | 147.75 ± 31.07 | 159.42 ± 48.64 | 98.85 ± 36.06 | (a, a, b) |
| REo/CSo | 37.27 ± 14.76 | 45.53 ± 13.11 | 27.25 ± 6.87 | (a, b, c) |
Performance index (PIABS), quantum efficiencies (ΦPo, ΦEo, Ψo), specific energy flux parameters (ABS/RC, DIo/RC, TRo/RC, ETo/RC, and REo/RC), and phenomenological energy flux parameters (ABS/CSo, DIo/CSo, TRo/CSo, ETo/CSo, and REo/CSo).
Figure 2The fast fluorescence rise (measured with the PEA instrument) in H. brasiletto, P. dulce, and P. guamacho leaves. Transient curves of each line represent the average of 7 plants.
Figure 3Biochemical traits: (A) chlorophyll a (Chla); (B) chlorophyll b (Chlb); (C) total chlorophylls (Chltotal); (D) carotenoid content (C); (E) Chla/Chlb ratio; (F) proline content; (G) total sugar content. Contents measured in the nurse tree species H. brasiletto, P. dulce, and P. guamacho. Values present median ± IQR (n = 4). The numbers in the upper brackets indicate the p-value, according to the Wilcoxon test for paired species with Bonferroni correction (NS: not significant).
Figure 4Morpho-anatomy of leaves of Haematoxylum brasiletto [(D,E): optical microscopy, sections stained with basic fuchsin and astra blue]. (A) Leaves; (B) adaxial side; (C) abaxial side; (D): foliar blade; (E): midrib; (F): diagram of midrib organization and part of leaf blade (ab: abaxial; ad: adaxial; co: collenchyma; ep: epidermis; ph: phloem; pp: palisade parenchyma; sp: spongy parenchyma; sc: sclerenchyma; st: stomata; xy: xylem; vb: vascular bundle). Scale bars: (A) = 5 cm; (B–E) = 0.1 mm.
Anatomical measurements of the leaf blade of the nurse tree species H. brasiletto, P. dulce, and P. guamacho.
| Variable |
|
|
| Groups | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesophyll (mm) | 0.103 ± 0.003 | 0.092 ± 0.01 | 0.415 ± 0.149 | 6 × 10−8 | (a, b, c) |
| Upper epidermis(mm) | 0.016 ± 0.003 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.022 ± 0.003 | 2 × 10−7 | (a, b, c) |
| Lower epidermis (mm) | 0.012 ± 0.003 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.021 ± 0.005 | 1 × 10−7 | (a, a, b) |
| Palisade parenchyma (mm) | 0.033 ± 0.006 | 0.031 ± 0.013 | - | NS | (a, a, -) |
| Spongy parenchyma (mm) | 0.04 ± 0.006 | 0.035 ± 0.006 | - | 3 × 10−3 | (a, b, -) |
| Undifferentiated | - | - | 0.368 ± 0.139 | - | - |
| Upper cuticle (mm) | - | 0.002 ± 0 | - | - | - |
| Lower cuticle (mm) | - | 0.001 ± 0.001 | - | - | - |
| IDV (mm) | 0.012 ± 0.002 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.011 ± 0.004 | NS | (a, a, a) |
| WWV (mm) | 0.002 ± 0 | 0.002 ± 0 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 4 × 10−5 | (a, ab, c) |
| LX (mm) | 0.072 ± 0.004 | 0.053 ± 0.007 | 0.049 ± 0.016 | 4 × 10−5 | (a, b, b) |
| Percentage (%) | 27.613 ± 3.517 | 19.203 ± 7.631 | 43.023 ± 12.075 | 4 × 10−5 | (a, b, c) |
Internal diameter of vessels of the xylem (IDV), width of the wall of the vessels (WWV), length of the xylem within the midrib (LX), and the percentage that represents the length of the xylem with respect to the width of the midrib (Percentage).
Figure 5Morpho-anatomy of leaves of Pithecellobium dulce [(D–F): optical microscopy, sections stained with basic fuchsin and astra blue]. (A) Leaves, (B) adaxial side, (C) abaxial side, (D) foliar blade, (E) and (F) midrib, and (G) diagram of midrib organization and part of leaf blade. (ab: abaxial; ad: adaxial; co: collenchyma; ct: cuticle; ep: epidermis; ph: phloem; pp: palisade parenchyma; sp: spongy parenchyma; sc: sclerenchyma; st: stomata; xy: xylem; vb: vascular bundle). Scale bars: (A) = 5 cm; (B–F) = 0.1 mm.
Figure 6Morpho-anatomy of leaves of Pereskia guamacho [(C–E): optical microscopy, sections stained with basic fuchsin and astra blue]. (A) Leaves, (B) adaxial side, (C) abaxial side, (D) foliar blade, (E) midrib, and (F) diagram of midrib organization. (ab: abaxial; ad: adaxial; dru: druses; ep: epidermis; ph: phloem; st: stomata; xy: xylem; up: undifferentiated parenchyma; vb: vascular bundle). Scale bars: (A) = 5 cm; (B–D) = 0.1 mm; (E) = 0.2 mm.
Figure A1Fertile area under the canopy of the tree nurse species (A) Haematoxylum brasiletto, (B) Pithecellobium dulce, and (C) Pereskia guamacho. These species facilitate the growth of understory plants and the formation of resource islands in the Indigenous Cerrejón Guajira Foundation Farm in the municipality of Uribia, Department of La Guajira, Colombia.
Formulae and glossary of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters derived from OJIP test, as described by Brestic and Zivcak [97], Gururani et al. [98], Strasser et al. [30] and González Moreno [26].
| Parameter | Basic Physiological Interpretation | Equation |
|---|---|---|
| Basic parameters derived from OJIP transient | ||
| Fo | Minimum fluorescence, when all RC PS II are open | - |
| Fm | Maximum fluorescence, when all RC PS II are closed | - |
| Fv | Variable fluorescence | Fv = Fm − Fo |
| Vt | Relative variable fluorescence at time t |
|
| Vj | Relative variable fluorescence at time 2 ms (J-step) | |
| Vi | Relative variable fluorescence at time 30 ms (I-step) | |
| TFm | Time of reaching maximum fluorescence |
|
| Mo | Initial slope of relative variable chlorophyll fluorescence, express the rate of electron trapping |
|
|
| ||
|
| Quantum efficiency of photosystem II |
|
|
| Probability that an absorbed exciton moves an electron after QA− |
|
|
| Efficiency with which a trapped exciton can move an electron after QA− |
|
|
| Efficiency with which an electron from the intersystem electron carriers moves to reduce end electron acceptors at the PSI acceptor side (RE) |
|
|
| ||
| ABS/RC | Absorption (ABS) per RC |
|
| DIo/RC | Dissipation (DI) at time 0 per RC |
|
| TRo/RC | Trapped energy flux (TR) at time 0 per RC |
|
| ETo/RC | Electron transport flux (ET) at time 0 per RC |
|
| REo/RC | Reduction in final electron acceptors on the electron acceptor side of PSI (RE) at time 0 per RC |
|
|
| ||
| ABS/CSo | Absorption (ABS) per CS using the Fodark value the samples exhibited while in a dark-adapted state |
|
| DIo/CSo |
| DIo/CSo = (ABS/CSo) − (TRo/CSo) |
| TRo/CSo | Trapping (TR) at time 0 per CS | |
|
| Electron transport (ET) at time 0 per CS | |
|
| Reduction in final electron acceptors on the electron acceptor side of PS I (RE) at time 0 per CS | |
|
| ||
|
| Performance index | PIABS = [RC/ABS][φPO/(1 − φ)] |