| Literature DB >> 35807662 |
Francisco Reyes-Zepeda1, Rapucel Tonantzin Quetzalli Heinz-Castro2, Fabian Eliseo Olazaran-Santibañez1, Salvador Ordaz-Silva3, José Guadalupe Pedro-Méndez3, Julio César Chacón-Hernández1.
Abstract
Avocado bronze mite (ABM), Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) has potential for development in several plant species of agricultural importance. ABM is one of the most economically important pests in avocado cultivars, causing major damage to fruit and defoliation. At present, the control of ABM depends mainly on agrochemicals. Therefore, it is necessary to find alternatives to agrochemicals that can help minimize environmental impact and health risks for humans and mammals. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of different concentrations (5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 µg/mL) of ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaves against adult ABM females. The different concentrations of M. tamaulipana extract did not cause mortality of O. punicae. Females treated with 5 and 1000 µg/mL of the extract showed a decrease in the number of eggs laid per female at 24 (5.17 and 1.27), 48 (5.07 and 1.17), and 72 h (4.97 and 0.80), compared to the control treatment (5.20, 6.60 and 6.87), respectively, which led to a reduction in the growth rate. Percentage of feeding damage decreased with the increasing concentration of the extract. The ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaf has potential to control O. punicae.Entities:
Keywords: antifeeding; antioviposition; avocado bronze mite; biological control; integrated pest management
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807662 PMCID: PMC9269261 DOI: 10.3390/plants11131711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Secondary metabolites (“+” = present; “−” = absent) in Magnolia tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract.
| Bioactive Compound | Test | Bioactive Compound | Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tannins | + | FeCl3 (catechol) | Flavonoids | + | Shinoda’s |
| + | K3[Fe(CN)6] | + | NaOH | ||
| + | Gelatine | Saponins | + | Foam | |
| Carbohydrates | + | Molisch’s | Sterols and terpenes | + | Burchard’s |
| Carotenoids | + | H2SO4 | Glycosides | − | Gringnard’s |
| + | FeCl3 | Quinones | + | Börntraguer’s | |
| Coumarins | − | NH4OH | + | H2SO4 | |
| Free reducing sugars | + | Fehling | Soluble starch | + | KOH and H2SO4 |
| Alkaloids | + | Benedict’s | + | Gelatine | |
| − | Dragendorff | Purins | + | HCI | |
| − | Sonneschain’s | Polysaccharides | − | Lugol’ |
Effect of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamulipana leaves on oviposition of Oligonychus punicae.
| Treatment | Eggs/Female ± SE * | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| Control | 5.20 ± 0.51 a ** | 6.60 ± 0.12 a | 6.87 ± 0.62 a |
| 5 µg/mL | 5.17 ± 0.18 a | 5.07 ± 0.26 b | 4.97 ± 0.12 ab |
| 10 µg/mL | 5.10 ± 0.23 a | 4.23 ± 0.23 bc | 3.97 ± 0.22 bc |
| 50 µg/mL | 4.43 ± 0.23 a | 3.93 ± 0.22 cd | 3.57 ± 0.88 bc |
| 100 µg/mL | 3.03 ± 0.15 b | 3.07 ± 0.23 de | 3.07 ± 0.18 cd |
| 250 µg/mL | 2.50 ± 0.12 bc | 2.1 ± 0.31 ef | 2.10 ± 0.21 de |
| 500 µg/mL | 1.53 ± 0.15 cd | 1.37 ± 0.03 f | 1.13 ± 0.17 e |
| 1000 µg/mL | 1.27 ± 0.18 d | 1.17 ± 0.07f | 0.80 ± 0.30 e |
| EC50 (IC95) | EC90 (IC95) | b ± EE | χ2 |
| 308.16 | 2982 | 2.23 ± 0.43 | 26.74 *** |
| (184.06–430.17) | (1718–9240) | ||
* Average number of eggs laid per female ± standard error (SE). ** Means (± SE) within a column and followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test). EC: Effective concentration EC50 (EC90) in µg/mL causing 50% (90%) inhibition of egg laying by Oligonychus punicae females, compared with untreated control. CI: Confidence interval at 95%. b: slope ± standard error. χ2: Chi square value. *** Level of significance p < 0.0001.
Figure 1Ovipositional activity index (mean ± standard error) for Oligonychus punicae in response to different concentrations of Magnolia tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract at (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, and (C) 72 h.
Effects of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamaulipana leaves on Oligonychus punicae feeding damage.
| Treatment | Percentage of Feeding Damage ± SE * | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| Control | 10.00 ± 0.58 a | 17.33 ± 1.45 a | 29.00 ± 1.00 a |
| 5 µg/mL | 8.67 ± 0.33 ab | 14.67 ± 0.33 ab | 21.00 ± 1.00 b |
| 10 µg/mL | 8.67 ± 0.88 ab | 14.67 ± 1.86 ab | 20.00 ± 0.58 b |
| 50 µg/mL | 8.00 ± 0.58 abc | 12.00 ± 1.53 bc | 19.67 ± 1.76 b |
| 100 µg/mL | 7.00 ± 0.58 abc | 8.67 ± 0.33 cd | 15.33 ± 1.45 bc |
| 250 µg/mL | 6.33 ± 0.67 bc | 7.00 ± 1.00 cd | 12.67 ± 1.15 cd |
| 500 µg/mL | 5.00 ± 0.58 cd | 6.67 ± 0.33 d | 8.67 ± 0.88 de |
| 1000 µg/mL | 2.67 ± 0.88 d | 4.33 ± 0.33 d | 5.67 ± 0.88 e |
* Means ± standard error (SE) within a column and followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test).
Figure 2Feeding activity index (mean ± standard error) for Oligonychus punicae in response to different concentrations of Magnolia tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract at (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, and (C) 72 h.
Figure 3The correlation between the number of eggs laid per female and percentage of feeding damage of Oligonychus punicae treated with different concentrations of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamaulipana leaves at 24 h (A), 48 h (B), and 72 h (C).
Effects of Magnolia tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract on the rate of increase, the finite rate of increase, and the population doubling time of Oligonychus punicae.
| Treatment | Demographic Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth Rate * | Finite Rate of Growth | Doubling Time | |
| Control | 0.9929 ± 0.01 a | 2.6991 ± 0.01 a | 0.6982 ± 0.00 f |
| 5 µg/mL | 0.9283 ± 0.00 b | 2.5303 ± 0.01 b | 0.7467 ± 0.00 ef |
| 10 µg/mL | 0.8865 ± 0.01 bc | 2.4268 ± 0.02 c | 0.7821 ± 0.01 ef |
| 50 µg/mL | 0.8532 ± 0.00 c | 2.3473 ± 0.01 c | 0.8124 ± 0.00 de |
| 100 µg/mL | 0.7729 ± 0.01 d | 2.1662 ± 0.01 d | 0.8969 ± 0.01 d |
| 250 µg/mL | 0.6796 ± 0.02 e | 1.9736 ± 0.03 e | 1.0212 ± 0.03 c |
| 500 µg/mL | 0.5376 ± 0.02 f | 1.7125 ± 0.03 f | 1.2929 ± 0.05 b |
| 1000 µg/mL | 0.4809 ± 0.01 g | 1.6175 ± 0.01 f | 1.4421 ± 0.02 a |
* Means ± standard error (SE) within a column and followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test).