| Literature DB >> 35807584 |
Zarreen Badar1, Abdallah Shanableh1,2, Ali El-Keblawy1,3,4, Kareem A Mosa3,5, Lucy Semerjian6, Abdullah Al Mutery3,7,8, Muhammad Iftikhar Hussain9, Sourjya Bhattacharjee2, François Mitterand Tsombou3,10, Sefeera Sadik Ayyaril1, Islam M Ahmady3, Attiat Elnaggar1,11, Muath Mousa1, Mohammad H Semreen12,13.
Abstract
The occurrence and persistence of pharmaceuticals in the food chain, particularly edible crops, can adversely affect human and environmental health. In this study, the impacts of the absorption, translocation, accumulation, and degradation of paracetamol in different organs of the leafy vegetable crop spinach (Spinacia oleracea) were assessed under controlled laboratory conditions. Spinach plants were exposed to 50 mg/L, 100 mg/L, and 200 mg/L paracetamol in 20% Hoagland solution at the vegetative phase in a hydroponic system. Exposed plants exhibited pronounced phytotoxic effects during the eight days trial period, with highly significant reductions seen in the plants' morphological parameters. The increasing paracetamol stress levels adversely affected the plants' photosynthetic machinery, altering the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm and PSII), photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Chl b and carotenoid contents), and composition of essential nutrients and elements. The LC-MS results indicated that the spinach organs receiving various paracetamol levels on day four exhibited significant uptake and translocation of the drug from roots to aerial parts, while degradation of the drug was observed after eight days. The VITEK® 2 system identified several bacterial strains (e.g., members of Burkhulderia, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Stenotrophomonas and Kocuria) isolated from spinach shoots and roots. These microbes have the potential to biodegrade paracetamol and other organic micro-pollutants. Our findings provide novel insights to mitigate the risks associated with pharmaceutical pollution in the environment and explore the bioremediation potential of edible crops and their associated microbial consortium to remove these pollutants effectively.Entities:
Keywords: abiotic stress; chlorophyll florescence; degradation; elements; growth parameters; microbes; paracetamol; photosynthetic pigments; spinach
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807584 PMCID: PMC9269112 DOI: 10.3390/plants11131626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Results of two-way ANOVAs showing the effects of different paracetamol treatments, exposure periods, and their interactions on the concentration of paracetamol (µg/g DW) in spinach shoots, roots, and translocation factor.
| Variable | Factor | df | F-Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoots | Period (P) | 1 | 488.82 | <0.001 |
| Treatments (T) | 2 | 1538.01 | <0.001 | |
| P × T | 2 | 332.65 | <0.001 | |
| Roots | Period (P) | 1 | 587.76 | <0.001 |
| Treatments (T) | 2 | 45.42 | <0.001 | |
| P × T | 2 | 11.49 | <0.01 | |
| Translocation Factor | Period (P) | 1 | 26.52 | <0.001 |
| Treatments (T) | 2 | 591.35 | <0.001 | |
| P × T | 2 | 0.17 | ns |
ns: non-significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Effect of different paracetamol treatments at different time points on the concentration of paracetamol (µg/g DW) in spinach (a) shoots, (b) roots, (c) translocation factor, and (d) dry leaves. Error bars represent means ± S.E. of three biological replicates. Means with different upper-case and lower-case letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the different paracetamol treatments at four and eight days, respectively. Asterisks (*) indicates significant differences between four and eight days at a certain concentration.
Figure 2Effects of different paracetamol treatments on spinach (a) shoot length, (b) root length and (c) number of leaves, and (d) growth tolerance index (%) of spinach shoots (GTIS) and roots (GTIR) after eight days. Error bars represent means ± S.E. of three biological replicates. For subfigures (a–c), means with the different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For subfigure (d), different upper-case and similar lower-case letters indicate significant differences between GTIS and non-significant differences between GTIR, respectively, at the different paracetamol treatments.
Results of two-way ANOVAs showing the effects of different paracetamol treatments, exposure periods, and their interactions on chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm and ΦII), Chl a, Chl b, carotenoids, and total chlorophyll content (mg/g FW) in spinach.
| Variable | Factor | df | F-Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fv/Fm | Period (P) | 1 | 29.45 | <0.001 |
| Treatment (T) | 3 | 7.07 | <0.01 | |
| P × T | 3 | 3.66 | <0.05 | |
| ΦII | Period (P) | 1 | 21.07 | <0.01 |
| Treatment (T) | 3 | 10.93 | <0.01 | |
| P × T | 3 | 3.43 | <0.05 | |
| Chl a | Period (P) | 1 | 6.19 | <0.05 |
| Treatment (T) | 3 | 1.77 | ns | |
| P × T | 3 | 1.52 | ns | |
| Chl b | Period (P) | 1 | 10.02 | <0.01 |
| Treatment (T) | 3 | 2.32 | ns | |
| P × T | 3 | 2.31 | ns | |
| Carotenoids | Period (P) | 1 | 4.34 | ns |
| Treatment (T) | 3 | 1.70 | ns | |
| P × T | 3 | 1.68 | ns | |
| Total Chlorophyll | Period (P) | 1 | 7.11 | <0.05 |
| Treatment (T) | 3 | 1.89 | ns | |
| P × T | 3 | 1.71 | ns |
ns: non-significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of different paracetamol treatments and exposure periods on (a) Fv/Fm, (b) quantum yield of electron transport in photosystem II (ΦII), (c) Chl a, (d) Chl b, (e) carotenoids and (f) total chlorophyll (mg/g FW). Error bars represent ± S.E. of three biological replicates. Means with different upper-case and lower-case letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) at days four and eight, respectively.
Figure 4Effects of different paracetamol treatments on concentrations (mg/kg DW) of (a–c) macronutrients, (d,e) micronutrients and (f) sodium in shoot and root systems of spinach. Error bars represent means ± S.E. of three biological replicates. Means with different upper-case and lower-case letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in nutrient and sodium concentrations between shoots and roots, respectively, at the different paracetamol treatments. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the concentration of a nutrient or sodium between shoots and roots at a certain paracetamol level.
Figure 5Variation in weight percentages of C, H, N, and S in spinach shoots after eight days of paracetamol treatment.
Figure 6Variation in C/N ratio in spinach shoots after eight days of paracetamol treatments.
Microbial consortium of spinach roots treated with paracetamol for eight days.
| Treatment | Isolate and Colony | Organism | Probability (%) | Confidence | Role in Plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control spinach roots | Gram +ve micrococcus, yellowish moist, moderate size |
| 98 | Excellent Identification | Antagonist bacteria in spinach [ |
| Gram −ve, white, large flat, and dry |
| 90 | Good Identification | Endophytic bacterium capable of fixing nitrogen and solubilizing phosphate [ | |
| Gram −ve, moderate moist |
| 99 | Excellent Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| Gram −ve, small moist |
| 99 | Excellent Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| 50 mg/L paracetamol-treated spinach roots | Gram −ve, yellow, large, and dry | 95 | Very Good Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| Gram −ve, pale yellow, small, moist |
| 98 | Excellent Identification | Involved in the degradation of paracetamol and aromatic compounds [ | |
| Gram +ve, white, large and moist |
| 95 | Very Good Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| Gram −ve rods, pale yellow |
| 95 | Very Good Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| 100 mg/L paracetamol-treated spinach roots | Gram +ve, pale yellow, |
| 87 | Acceptable Identification | Antagonist bacteria in spinach [ |
| Gram +ve, white, small, round |
| 98 | Excellent Identification | Capable of growing on naphthalene, phenanthrene and fluoranthene, on all three polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [ | |
| 200 mg/L paracetamol-treated spinach roots | Gram −ve, coccobacillus, | 91 | Good Identification | Foodborne pathogen. Contaminant of leafy vegetables and causes human brucellosis [ | |
| Gram −ve bacilli, yellow, large and |
| 92 | Good Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| Gram +ve, white, moderate size |
| 98 | Excellent Identification | Spinach microbiota, increases growth parameters in |
Microbial consortium of spinach shoots treated with paracetamol for eight days.
| Treatment | Isolate and Colony Description | Organism | Probability (%) | Confidence | Role in Plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control spinach shoots | Gram +ve, white moist, moderate size colonies |
| N.A. | Low Discrimination Organism | Epiphytic bacteria from fruits and leafy greens, spinach microbiota [ |
| Gram +ve, white moist, moderate size colonies |
| N.A. | Low Discrimination Organism | Epiphytic bacteria on leafy greens, capable of fixing nitrogen and solubilizing phosphate [ | |
| Gram −ve, moderate yellow moist colonies |
| N.A. | Low Discrimination Organism | Pathogenic bacteria [ | |
| Gram −ve, moderate yellow moist colonies |
| NA | Low Discrimination Organism | Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, involved in biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds from contaminated water/soil environment [ | |
| 50 mg/L paracetamol-treated spinach shoots | Gram −ve bacilli, yellow, large and |
| 89 | Good Identification | Spinach microbiota, involved in the degradation of paracetamol and aromatic compounds [ |
| Gram +ve, white, moderate size |
| 95 | Very Good Identification | Spinach microbiota [ | |
| 100 mg/L paracetamol-treated spinach shoots | Gram +ve, pale yellow, moderate, moist |
| 98 | Excellent Identification | Capable of growing on naphthalene, phenanthrene and fluoranthene, on all three polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [ |
| Gram −ve, white, moderate size, moist |
| 93 | Very Good Identification | Foodborne pathogen, spinach microbiota [ | |
| 200 mg/L paracetamol treated spinach shoots | Gram +ve, white, moderate, moist |
| 98 | Excellent Identification | Spinach microbiota [ |
| Gram +ve, white, moderate, moist |
| 90 | Good Identification | Epiphytic bacteria from fruits and leafy greens are potential biocontrol agents, able to reduce the proliferation of |