Literature DB >> 3580756

Mammographic patterns in twin pairs discordant for breast cancer.

J Kaprio, A Alanko, L Kivisaari, C G Standertskjöld-Nordenstam.   

Abstract

As part of a case-control study of breast cancer in pairs of twins selected from the population-based Finnish Twin Cohort, mammograms of 30 pairs (seven monozygotic (MZ), 23 dizygotic (DZ] discordant for breast cancer were analysed. The mammographic pattern in the unaffected breast of the cancer case was compared with the pattern in the ipsilateral breast of the healthy twin (control). There were no differences for MZ pairs, while among DZ pairs the cancer case had a prominent parenchymal pattern significantly more often than the control, as assessed by two radiologists independently and blindly. Thus, there is a relationship between parenchymal pattern and risk of breast cancer even when the controls are the twin sisters of breast-cancer cases and are themselves at high risk. The overall similarity, despite disease discordance, in parenchymal pattern of the twins (more evident among MZ than DZ pairs) suggests a familial, possibly genetic influence on parenchymal pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3580756     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-713-459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Can genes for mammographic density inform cancer aetiology?

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Mammographic density and breast cancer in women from high risk families.

Authors:  Teresa Ramón Y Cajal; Isabel Chirivella; Josefa Miranda; Alexandre Teule; Ángel Izquierdo; Judith Balmaña; Ana Beatriz Sánchez-Heras; Gemma Llort; David Fisas; Virginia Lope; Elena Hernández-Agudo; María José Juan-Fita; Isabel Tena; Luis Robles; Carmen Guillén-Ponce; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Mari Sol Luque-Molina; Susana Hernando-Polo; Mónica Salinas; Joan Brunet; María Dolores Salas-Trejo; Agustí Barnadas; Marina Pollán
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Hui Li; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene; Catherine K Chow; Li Lan; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Mitchell H Gail; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.