Literature DB >> 35806901

Reply to Ayuso García et al. Health Perception among Female COVID-19 Patients. Comment on "Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al. Female Sex Is a Risk Factor Associated with Long-Term Post-COVID Related-Symptoms but Not with COVID-19 Symptoms: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 413".

César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas1,2, José D Martín-Guerrero3, Óscar J Pellicer-Valero3, Esperanza Navarro-Pardo4, Víctor Gómez-Mayordomo5, María L Cuadrado5,6, José A Arias-Navalón7, Margarita Cigarán-Méndez8, Valentín Hernández-Barrera9, Lars Arendt-Nielsen2,10.   

Abstract

We have read with great interest the comment by Ayuso García et al [...].

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35806901      PMCID: PMC9267921          DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.964


We have read with great interest the comment by Ayuso García et al. [1] based on our article [2]. Ayuso García et al. [1] presented data confirming that females with long COVID reported lower health-related quality of life than men. These results complement those previously observed by our group [2] and those conclusions reported by a recent systematic review confirming that female sex is a risk factor for developing long COVID symptoms [3]. Current research supports that females, although they exhibit lower risk for severe acute infection and less mortality than males, suffer more post-COVID symptomatology at different aspects including physical, emotional, cognitive, and health-related quality of life [1,2,3]. Accordingly, this means that management of long COVID should be considered from a gender perspective since considering sex differences in diagnosis, prevention and treatment of diseases are fundamental steps towards precision medicine [4]. Several biological, emotional, and social gender differences should be considered and integrated when managing long COVID. Among the biological differences (e.g., genetics, hormones) two main factors would be related to long COVID. First, females have a greater expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) receptors than males [5]. Since these receptors are the main cellular-to-cellular internal pathway of SARS-CoV-2, their higher expression could contribute to a higher viral load and a posterior persistence of the virus in females [5]. A second biological aspect would be a decreased innate immunological response (i.e., lower production of pro-inflammatory interleukin-6 (IL-6), after the acute phase of the infection in females) [6]. This reduced immunological response could lead to a rebound effect and a greater development of post-COVID symptoms [6]. Obviously, an effect of estrogens in these responses should be also taken into account [7]. Others have proposed that gender differences in brain development and functioning would explain biological differences between males and females [8,9]. Differences in emotional and cognitive behaviors could also explain gender differences in post-COVID symptoms. Females usually exhibit higher prevalence of mood disorders (e.g., depressive or anxiety levels and worse quality of sleep than males). This has been observed in particular during the pandemic/confinement since the COVID-19 outbreak’s surrounding factors such as isolation, fear of the infection, or uncertainty against a new and unexpected situation affected more females than males [10]. This is in agreement with findings suggesting that females are considerably more susceptible to secondary traumatization than male [11]. Since COVID-19 is being considered as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), this stressful situation could induce a worse perception of health in females. Finally, social factors intrinsic to gender should be also integrated into this equation. For instance, due to a higher fear perception, females exhibit different sanitary-related behaviors during this sanitary crisis (e.g., more frequent hand washing or less exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus) than males [12]. However, the relevance of these factors with respect to the development of more severe post-COVID symptoms seems to be small, but should be considered for better understanding the different responses between males and females. In conclusion, in agreement with Ayuso García et al. [1] and Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al. [2], long COVID symptoms (physical, cognitive and health-related) must be treated from a gender perspective. Future clinical trials investigating the effects of potential treatments for long COVID should integrate biological, emotional, and social differences between males and females.
  12 in total

1.  Coronavirus: Why Men are More Vulnerable to Covid-19 Than Women?

Authors:  George M Bwire
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 2.  Gender and COVID-19 related fear and anxiety: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmet Metin; Eyüp Sabır Erbiçer; Sedat Şen; Ali Çetinkaya
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.533

3.  Heightened susceptibility to secondary traumatization: A meta-analysis of gender differences.

Authors:  Nehami Baum; Giora Rahav; Michal Sharon
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2014-03

4.  Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nader Salari; Amin Hosseinian-Far; Rostam Jalali; Aliakbar Vaisi-Raygani; Shna Rasoulpoor; Masoud Mohammadi; Shabnam Rasoulpoor; Behnam Khaledi-Paveh
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 5.  Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine.

Authors:  Franck Mauvais-Jarvis; Noel Bairey Merz; Peter J Barnes; Roberta D Brinton; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Dawn L DeMeo; Geert J De Vries; C Neill Epperson; Ramaswamy Govindan; Sabra L Klein; Amedeo Lonardo; Pauline M Maki; Louise D McCullough; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Judith G Regensteiner; Joshua B Rubin; Kathryn Sandberg; Ayako Suzuki
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Female Sex Is a Risk Factor Associated with Long-Term Post-COVID Related-Symptoms but Not with COVID-19 Symptoms: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM Multicenter Study.

Authors:  César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; José D Martín-Guerrero; Óscar J Pellicer-Valero; Esperanza Navarro-Pardo; Víctor Gómez-Mayordomo; María L Cuadrado; José A Arias-Navalón; Margarita Cigarán-Méndez; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan.

Authors:  Lara M Wierenga; Gaelle E Doucet; Danai Dima; Ingrid Agartz; Moji Aghajani; Theophilus N Akudjedu; Anton Albajes-Eizagirre; Dag Alnaes; Kathryn I Alpert; Ole A Andreassen; Alan Anticevic; Philip Asherson; Tobias Banaschewski; Nuria Bargallo; Sarah Baumeister; Ramona Baur-Streubel; Alessandro Bertolino; Aurora Bonvino; Dorret I Boomsma; Stefan Borgwardt; Josiane Bourque; Anouk den Braber; Daniel Brandeis; Alan Breier; Henry Brodaty; Rachel M Brouwer; Jan K Buitelaar; Geraldo F Busatto; Vince D Calhoun; Erick J Canales-Rodríguez; Dara M Cannon; Xavier Caseras; Francisco X Castellanos; Tiffany M Chaim-Avancini; Christopher Rk Ching; Vincent P Clark; Patricia J Conrod; Annette Conzelmann; Fabrice Crivello; Christopher G Davey; Erin W Dickie; Stefan Ehrlich; Dennis Van't Ent; Simon E Fisher; Jean-Paul Fouche; Barbara Franke; Paola Fuentes-Claramonte; Eco Jc de Geus; Annabella Di Giorgio; David C Glahn; Ian H Gotlib; Hans J Grabe; Oliver Gruber; Patricia Gruner; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Tiril P Gurholt; Lieuwe de Haan; Beathe Haatveit; Ben J Harrison; Catharina A Hartman; Sean N Hatton; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Odile A van den Heuvel; Ian B Hickie; Pieter J Hoekstra; Sarah Hohmann; Avram J Holmes; Martine Hoogman; Norbert Hosten; Fleur M Howells; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Chaim Huyser; Neda Jahanshad; Anthony C James; Jiyang Jiang; Erik G Jönsson; John A Joska; Andrew J Kalnin; Marieke Klein; Laura Koenders; Knut K Kolskår; Bernd Krämer; Jonna Kuntsi; Jim Lagopoulos; Luisa Lazaro; Irina S Lebedeva; Phil H Lee; Christine Lochner; Marise Wj Machielsen; Sophie Maingault; Nicholas G Martin; Ignacio Martínez-Zalacaín; David Mataix-Cols; Bernard Mazoyer; Brenna C McDonald; Colm McDonald; Andrew M McIntosh; Katie L McMahon; Genevieve McPhilemy; Dennis van der Meer; José M Menchón; Jilly Naaijen; Lars Nyberg; Jaap Oosterlaan; Yannis Paloyelis; Paul Pauli; Giulio Pergola; Edith Pomarol-Clotet; Maria J Portella; Joaquim Radua; Andreas Reif; Geneviève Richard; Joshua L Roffman; Pedro Gp Rosa; Matthew D Sacchet; Perminder S Sachdev; Raymond Salvador; Salvador Sarró; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Andrew J Saykin; Mauricio H Serpa; Kang Sim; Andrew Simmons; Jordan W Smoller; Iris E Sommer; Carles Soriano-Mas; Dan J Stein; Lachlan T Strike; Philip R Szeszko; Henk S Temmingh; Sophia I Thomopoulos; Alexander S Tomyshev; Julian N Trollor; Anne Uhlmann; Ilya M Veer; Dick J Veltman; Aristotle Voineskos; Henry Völzke; Henrik Walter; Lei Wang; Yang Wang; Bernd Weber; Wei Wen; John D West; Lars T Westlye; Heather C Whalley; Steven Cr Williams; Katharina Wittfeld; Daniel H Wolf; Margaret J Wright; Yuliya N Yoncheva; Marcus V Zanetti; Georg C Ziegler; Greig I de Zubicaray; Paul M Thompson; Eveline A Crone; Sophia Frangou; Christian K Tamnes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 8.  Prognostic Factors for Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Maglietta; Francesca Diodati; Matteo Puntoni; Silvia Lazzarelli; Barbara Marcomini; Laura Patrizi; Caterina Caminiti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Gender differences in the battle against COVID-19: Impact of genetics, comorbidities, inflammation and lifestyle on differences in outcomes.

Authors:  Pantea Stoian Anca; Peter P Toth; Peter Kempler; Manfredi Rizzo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.149

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.