| Literature DB >> 35806840 |
Sevan Bouchy1,2, Ricardo J Zednik1,2, Pierre Bélanger1,2.
Abstract
Lithium niobate (LiNbO3) is known for its high Curie temperature, making it an attractive candidate for high-temperature piezoelectric applications (>200 °C); however, the literature suffers from a paucity of reliable material properties data at high temperatures. This paper therefore provides a complete set of elastic and piezoelectric coefficients, as well as complex dielectric constants and the electrical conductivity, for congruent monocrystalline LiNbO3 from 25 °C to 900 °C at atmospheric pressure. An inverse approach using the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) resonance method was used to determine the materials' coefficients and constants. Single crystal Y-cut and Z-cut samples were used to estimate the twelve coefficients defining the electromechanical coupling of LiNbO3. We employed an analytical model inversion to calculate the coefficients based on a linear superposition of nine different bulk acoustic waves (three longitudinal waves and six shear waves), in addition to considering the thermal expansion of the crystal. The results are reported and compared with those of other studies for which the literature has available values. The dominant piezoelectric stress constant was found to be e15, which remained virtually constant between 25 °C and 600 °C; thereafter, it decreased by approximately 10% between 600 °C and 900 °C. The elastic stiffness coefficients c11E, c12E, and c33E all decreased as the temperature increased. The two dielectric constants ϵ11S and ϵ33S increased exponentially as a function of temperature.Entities:
Keywords: high temperature; impedance spectroscopy; lithium niobate; piezoelectricity; resonance method
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806840 PMCID: PMC9267966 DOI: 10.3390/ma15134716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Properties of lithium niobate according to Singh et al. [30].
| Li:Nb | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (unitless) | (g/cm | (10 | (10 |
| 48.68:51.32 | 4.61 | | |
| 49.50:50.50 | 4.45 |
| |
Lattice parameter selected in this model depending on the temperature.
| Temperature (°C) | 25 | 47 | 67 | 87 | 107 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 | 900 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.1 | 14.6 | 15.2 | 15.7 | 16.1 | 17.8 | 19 | 20.1 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 23.9 | 24.9 | |
| 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | −1.1 | −2.8 | −4.6 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of apparatus for performing impedance analysis at high temperature.
Figure 2Electrochemical impedance modulus and phase spectrum of a Z-cut lithium niobate measured at 25 °C, 450 °C, and 900 °C.
Figure 3Electrochemical impedance modulus spectrum of a Y-cut lithium niobate with experimental data and fitted curve measured at: (a) 900 °C with no loss in the inverse model, (b) 25 °C with loss in the inverse model, (c) 450 °C with loss in the inverse model, and (d) 900 °C with loss in the inverse model.
Elastic, piezoelectric, dielectric constants, and electromechanical coupling factors for LiNbO from room temperature to 900 °C.
| 25 °C | 100 °C | 200 °C | 300 °C | 400 °C | 500 °C | 600 °C | 700 °C | 800 °C | 900 °C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant electric field | ||||||||||
| Elastic stiffness (10 | (N/m | |||||||||
|
| 192 | 190 | 187 | 184 | 181 | 179 | 176 | 172 | 171 | 170 |
|
| 54.7 | 54.5 | 54.3 | 53.2 | 52.4 | 40.0 | 39.3 | 39.2 | 38.3 | 36.9 |
|
| 75.1 | 76.6 | 77.1 | 76.7 | 76.3 | 77.3 | 75.4 | 75.6 | 75.3 | 75.5 |
|
| 8.6 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
|
| 231 | 230 | 229 | 227 | 223 | 219 | 216 | 213 | 213 | 210 |
|
| 59.5 | 59.0 | 57.3 | 56.1 | 55.9 | 55.6 | 55.5 | 55.5 | 57.4 | 58.4 |
| Piezoelectric stress | ||||||||||
| constant | (C/m | |||||||||
|
| 3.75 | 3.76 | 3.79 | 3.77 | 3.74 | 3.70 | 3.71 | 3.66 | 3.66 | 3.66 |
|
| 2.42 | 2.43 | 2.40 | 2.36 | 2.34 | 2.39 | 2.34 | 2.35 | 2.36 | 2.28 |
|
| 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.23 |
|
| 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.64 | 1.76 | 1.98 | 2.30 | 2.70 | 2.75 | 2.90 | 3.13 |
| Constant strain | ||||||||||
| Dielectric constant | (10 | |||||||||
|
| 0.398 | 0.408 | 0.416 | 0.444 | 0.476 | 0.508 | 0.576 | 0.657 | 0.740 | 0.866 |
|
| 0.213 | 0.217 | 0.225 | 0.234 | 0.284 | 0.374 | 0.469 | 0.499 | 0.682 | 1.026 |
| Dielectric loss | (unitless) | |||||||||
|
| 0.00002 | 0.00003 | 0.00007 | 0.0001 | 0.010 | 0.018 | 0.025 | 0.032 | 0.060 | 0.150 |
|
| 0.00004 | 0.00005 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.017 | 0.034 | 0.036 | 0.041 | 0.079 | 0.190 |
| Electrical conductivity | (10 | |||||||||
|
| 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.230 | 0.340 | 0.550 | 1.650 | 8.666 |
Elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric coefficients of LiNbO piezoelectric ceramic at room temperature with literature reference.
| Present Work | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant electric field | Smith | Warner | Kovacs | Kushibiki | Ledbetter | Andrushchak | De Castilla | Chen | |
| Elastic stiffness | (10 | (1971) | (1967) | (1990) | (1999) | (2004) | (2009) | (2017) | (2019) |
|
| 192 | 203 | 203 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 199 | 203 | 194 |
|
| 54.7 | 57.3 | 53.0 | 54.7 | 54.7 | 55.3 | 54.7 | 59.9 | 42.8 |
|
| 75.1 | 75.2 | 75.0 | 65.1 | 68.0 | 67.7 | 70.0 | 72.5 | 52.2 |
|
| 8.6 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 8.4 |
|
| 231 | 242 | 245 | 228 | 234 | 235 | 240 | 236 | 223 |
|
| 59.5 | 59.5 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 59.9 | 59.5 | 59.9 | 58.7 | 61.5 |
| Piezoelectric stress | |||||||||
| constant | (C/m | ||||||||
|
| 3.75 | 3.76 | 3.7 | 3.69 | 3.66 | 3.65 | 3.67 | 3.89 | 3.85 |
|
| 2.42 | 2.44 | 2.5 | 2.42 | 2.41 | 2.39 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 2.30 |
|
| 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.18 | |
|
| 1.71 | 1.33 | 1.3 | 1.77 | 1.89 | 1.72 | 1.60 | 1.66 | |
| Constant strain | |||||||||
| Dielectric constant | (10 | ||||||||
|
| 0.398 | 0.392 | 0.390 | 0.404 | 0.398 | 0.399 | 0.389 | 0.423 | 0.389 |
|
| 0.213 | 0.247 | 0.257 | 0.233 | 0.236 | 0.232 | 0.247 | 0.248 |
Figure 4dielectric constants at constant strain and loss in LiNbO as a function of temperature and comparison with the literature.
Figure 5constant electric field elastic stiffness in LiNbO as a function of temperature and comparison with the literature.
Figure 6measured piezoelectric stress constants as a function of temperature and comparison with the literature.