| Literature DB >> 35806830 |
Xiuhua Fu1, Suotao Dong1, Shifu Xiong2, Cheng Li3, Xiaodong Chen4.
Abstract
With the rapid development of laser medicine, there are higher requirements placed on the performance of optical components in various medical systems. This paper is aimed at exploring the critical optical devices of medical equipment for treating periodontitis and gingivitis. The cathode sputtering method was used to produce the wide-angle short-wave pass filter, and a hundreds grid fastness test was conducted to detect the occurrence of film peeling. Considering the results of SEM, transmission spectrum, and stress test of the sample, an analysis was conducted as to the cause of poor bonding force for the film. By increasing the amount of argon gas and adjusting the baking temperature, the problem of film peeling was resolved. Besides, a short-wave pass filter film with good bonding and low roughness was obtained to meet the requirements of laser medical equipment.Entities:
Keywords: cathode sputtering; film peeling; hundreds grid fastness test; laser medical treatment; short-wave pass filter film; wide-angle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806830 PMCID: PMC9268074 DOI: 10.3390/ma15134706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Filter film parameters requirements.
| Incident Angle/° | Wavelength/nm | Transmittance/% |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 410~810 | >96 |
| 850~1100 | <1 | |
| 35 | 410~775 | >96 |
| 830~1100 | <1 |
Figure 1Refractive index of two materials.
Thin-film structure and film thickness.
| Num | Thickness | Num | Thickness | Num | Thickness | Num | Thickness | Num | Thickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub | 15 | 0.58L | 30 | 0.37H | 45 | 0.38L | 60 | 2.10H | |
| 1 | 0.48L | 16 | 2.11H | 31 | 0.48L | 46 | 0.44H | 61 | 0.36L |
| 2 | 0.51H | 17 | 2.09L | 32 | 2.03H | 47 | 0.39L | 62 | 0.44H |
| 3 | 0.26L | 18 | 1.94H | 33 | 0.46L | 48 | 2.14H | 63 | 0.40L |
| 4 | 1.11H | 19 | 2.03L | 34 | 0.39H | 49 | 0.36L | 64 | 2.16H |
| 5 | 0.21L | 20 | 1.87H | 35 | 0.44L | 50 | 0.46H | 65 | 0.51L |
| 6 | 0.55H | 21 | 0.59L | 36 | 2.03H | 51 | 0.34L | 66 | 0.33H |
| 7 | 2.16L | 22 | 0.26H | 37 | 0.40L | 52 | 2.10H | 67 | 0.53L |
| 8 | 1.96H | 23 | 0.60L | 38 | 0.39H | 53 | 0.31L | 68 | 2.08H |
| 9 | 2.05L | 24 | 1.98H | 39 | 0.42L | 54 | 0.50H | 69 | 0.46L |
| 10 | 1.92H | 25 | 0.57L | 40 | 2.11H | 55 | 0.34L | 70 | 0.37H |
| 11 | 2.04L | 26 | 0.29H | 41 | 0.43L | 56 | 2.12H | 71 | 0.45L |
| 12 | 2.05H | 27 | 0.59L | 42 | 0.41H | 57 | 0.39L | 72 | 1.89H |
| 13 | 0.62L | 28 | 2.01H | 43 | 0.43L | 58 | 0.43H | 73 | 0.87L |
| 14 | 0.34H | 29 | 0.47L | 44 | 2.10H | 59 | 0.35L | Air |
Figure 2Design Spectral to 0° and 35°.
Figure 3Peeling test.
Figure 4Peeling test results with Different Argon flow for SiO2.
Figure 5Peeling test results with Different Temperatures.
Figure 6Nb2O5/SiO2 multilayer thin-film stress results.
Figure 7Nb2O5/SiO2 multilayer thin film SEM data for 35 sccm Ar.
Figure 8Nb2O5/SiO2 multilayer thin-film SEM data for 80 sccm Ar.
Figure 9BPF Spectral test results for 0° and 35°.