| Literature DB >> 35806819 |
Dmitrii German1, Ekaterina Kolobova1, Ekaterina Pakrieva1, Sónia A C Carabineiro2,3, Elizaveta Sviridova1, Sergey Perevezentsev4, Shahram Alijani5, Alberto Villa5, Laura Prati5, Pavel Postnikov1, Nina Bogdanchikova6, Alexey Pestryakov1,7.
Abstract
Herein, we investigated the effect of the support modification (Sibunit carbon) with diazonium salts of Pd and Pd-Au catalysts on furfural hydrogenation under 5 bars of H2 and 50 °C. To this end, the surface of Sibunit (Cp) was modified with butyl (Cp-Butyl), carboxyl (Cp-COOH) and amino groups (Cp-NH2) using corresponding diazonium salts. The catalysts were synthesized by the sol immobilization method. The catalysts as well as the corresponding supports were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, N2 adsorption-desorption, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Hammet indicator method and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The analysis of the results allowed us to determine the crucial influence of surface chemistry on the catalytic behavior of the studied catalysts, especially regarding selectivity. At the same time, the structural, textural, electronic and acid-base properties of the catalysts were practically unaffected. Thus, it can be assumed that the modification of Sibunit with various functional groups leads to changes in the hydrophobic/hydrophilic and/or electrostatic properties of the surface, which influenced the selectivity of the process.Entities:
Keywords: Sibunit carbon; bimetallic catalysts; furfural; furfuryl alcohol; gold; hydrogenation; palladium; surface modification; tosylate salts
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806819 PMCID: PMC9267796 DOI: 10.3390/ma15134695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Catalytic hydrogenation of furfural on different palladium catalysts.
| Catalyst | Reaction Conditions | Conv., % | Selectivity, % | Ref. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | THFA | 2-MF | 2-MTHF | ||||
| 1% Pd/TiO2 | RT, 3 bar H2, 0.1 g of catalyst, 1 g of furfural, octane—solvent, 2 h | 20.7 | 73 | 14 | 7 | - | [ |
| 2.5 % Pd— 2.5 % Ru/TiO2 | RT, 3 bar H2, 0.1 g of catalyst, 1 g of furfural, octane—solvent, 2 h | 33.8 | 58 | 0.4 | 14 | - | [ |
| 5% Pd/C | 150 °C, 2.0 MPa H2, 800 rpm, 0.4 g of catalysts, 9.6 g of furfural, 6 g of acetic acid, toluene—solvent, 4 h | 41.2 | 35 | - | 21.6 | - | [ |
| 5 % Pd/Al2(SiO3)3 | 150 °C, 2.0 MPa H2, 800 rpm,0.4 g of catalysts, 9.6 g of furfural, 6 g of acetic acid, toluene—solvent, 4 h | 56.9 | 52.7 | - | - | - | [ |
| 1% Pd/CNT | 180 °C, 2.0 MPa H2, 600 rpm, 0.01 g of catalysts, 1 g of furfural, 2-propanol—solvent, 5 h | 29.1 | 14.9 | 2.5 | 1.8 | - | [ |
| 1% Pd/Vulcan | 180 °C, 2.0 MPa H2, 600 rpm,0.01 g of catalysts, 1 g of furfural, 2-propanol—solvent, 5 h | 46.7 | 24.3 | 7.2 | 1.8 | - | [ |
| 1% Pd/CMK-5 | 180 °C, 2.0 MPa H2, 600 rpm,0.01 g of catalysts, 1 g of furfural, 2-propanol—solvent, 5 h | 100 | 20.3 | 31.5 | 13.4 | - | [ |
| Pd/C + CuO | 170 °C, 3.0 MPa H2, 500 rpm, 0.3 g of furfural, 1,4-dioxane—solvent, 3 h | 24.1 | 61.4 | 5.8 | - | - | [ |
| 0.9 % Pd/ZrO2 | 30 °C, 0.5 MPa H2, 0.05 g of catalysts, 0.1 mL of furfural, water—solvent, 3 h | 34 | 21 | 16 | - | - | [ |
| 0.8 % Pd/SiO2 | 30 °C, 0.5 MPa H2, 0.05 g of catalysts, 0.1 mL of furfural, water—solvent, 3 h | 63 | 39 | 21 | - | - | [ |
| 1 % Pd/MgAlOx | 150 °C, 3.0 MPa H2, 0.5 g of catalysts, 5.0 cm3 of furfural, water—solvent, 1 h | 62.9 | 48.6 | 32.4 | - | - | [ |
Figure 1Scheme of support modification by diazonium salts and immobilization of Pd and Au nanoparticles.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the catalytic process.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of Cp, Cp−COOH, Cp−butyl and Cp−NH2.
Pd and Au contents in the catalysts.
| Catalyst | Content of Element, % | |
|---|---|---|
| Pd | Au a | |
| Nominal | 0.7–1.0 b | 0–0.3 c |
| Pd/Cp | 0.72 | 0 |
| Pd-Au/Cp | 0.73 | 0.32 |
| Pd/Cp-COOH | 0.93 | 0 |
| Pd-Au/Cp-COOH | 0.63 | 0.36 |
| Pd/Cp-butyl | 0.71 | 0 |
| Pd-Au/Cp-butyl | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| Pd/Cp-NH2 | 0.92 | 0 |
| Pd-Au/Cp-NH2 | 0.78 | 0.28 |
a determined by XEDS; b content of Pd is 1.0 and 0.7% for mono- and bimetallic catalysts, respectively; c content of Au is 0 and 0.3% for mono- and bimetallic catalysts, respectively.
Figure 4XRD patterns of catalysts and corresponding supports: (a) Cp, Pd/Cp and Pd-Au/Cp; (b) Cp-COOH, Pd/Cp-COOH and Pd-Au/Cp-COOH; (c) Cp-butyl, Pd/Cp-butyl and Pd-Au/Cp-butyl; (d) Cp-NH2, Pd/Cp-NH2 and Pd-Au/Cp-NH2.
Figure 5TEM images and EDX maps of the studied catalysts, as well as Pd and Pd-Au NPs distribution: (a) Pd/Cp; (b) Pd-Au/Cp; (c) Pd/Cp-COOH; (d) Pd-Au/Cp-COOH; (e) Pd/Cp-butyl; (f) Pd-Au/Cp-butyl; (g) Pd/Cp-NH2; (h) Pd-Au/Cp-NH2.
Textural properties of supports and corresponding catalysts.
| Entry | Sample | BET Surface Area, m2 g−1 | Surface Area of Mesopores, m2 g−1 | Surface Area of Micropores, m2 g−1 | Mesopore Volume, | Micropore Volume, | Mesopore Size, nm | Micropore Size, nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cp | 281 | 310 | 7 | 0.48 | 0.003 | 6.2 | 1.9 |
| 2 | Pd/Cp | 314 | 357 | 5 | 0.59 | 0.002 | 6.6 | 2.0 |
| 3 | Pd-Au/Cp | 327 | 368 | 5 | 0.60 | 0.003 | 6.5 | 2.0 |
| 4 | Cp-COOH | 209 | 264 | - | 0.45 | - | 6.8 | - |
| 5 | Pd/Cp-COOH | 228 | 280 | 2 | 0.45 | 0.001 | 6.4 | 1.9 |
| 6 | Pd-Au/Cp-COOH | 252 | 302 | 4 | 0.52 | 0.002 | 6.9 | 1.9 |
| 7 | Cp-butyl | 246 | 307 | 4 | 0.53 | 0.002 | 6.9 | 1.8 |
| 8 | Pd/Cp-butyl | 237 | 299 | 3 | 0.49 | 0.002 | 6.5 | 1.8 |
| 9 | Pd-Au/Cp-butyl | 258 | 321 | 3 | 0.52 | 0.001 | 6.5 | 1.8 |
| 10 | Cp-NH2 | 235 | 294 | 4 | 0.48 | 0.002 | 6.5 | 1.8 |
| 11 | Pd/Cp-NH2 | 235 | 291 | 3 | 0.48 | 0.002 | 6.0 | 1.6 |
| 12 | Pd-Au/Cp-NH2 | 274 | 326 | 6 | 0.48 | 0.003 | 5.9 | 1.8 |
The concentration of acid–base centers on the surface of the studied catalysts and corresponding supports (q, μmol/g): 1—Cp; 2—Pd/Cp; 3—Pd-Au/Cp; 4—Cp-COOH; 5—Pd/Cp-COOH; 6—Pd-Au/Cp-COOH; 7—Cp-butyl; 8—Pd/Cp-butyl; 9—Pd-Au/Cp-butyl; 10—Cp-NH2; 11—Pd/Cp-NH2; 12—Pd-Au/Cp-NH2.
| pKa | SAMPLE | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 13.7 | 14.5 | 13.4 | 5.9 | 13.8 | 13.3 | 10.9 | 11,5 | 10.3 | 14.3 | 14.5 | 14 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 7.0 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.1 |
|
| 3.5 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.6 |
|
| 6.7 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 5.9 | 5 |
|
| 6.6 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 7.2 | 7 | 7 |
|
| 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 7.3 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 2.4 | 5.5 | 5.4 |
|
| 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 2 | 2.1 |
|
| 32.8 | 31.8 | 31.0 | 21.6 | 23.4 | 27.7 | 26.0 | 21.3 | 24.5 | 20.5 | 30.3 | 30.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 14.9 | 14.4 | 14.2 | 4.2 | 6.8 | 9.9 | 6.1 | 9.2 | 10.3 | 13.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
|
| 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 3 | 2.9 | 3 |
|
| 8.3 | 7.2 | 8.9 | 6.3 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 8.4 | 8.7 |
|
| 26.4 | 25.2 | 26.7 | 13.6 | 18.0 | 20.7 | 15.3 | 17.8 | 21.2 | 25.6 | 12.1 | 12.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 9.0 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 6.5 | 8.4 | 9.6 | 8.2 | 7.7 | 8.1 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 81.9 | 79.3 | 79.4 | 41.5 | 59.5 | 62.6 | 58.7 | 59 | 65.6 | 68.6 | 64.6 | 64.5 |
Figure 6Pd3d XPS spectra: (a) Pd/Cp; (b) Pd-Au/Cp; (c) Pd/Cp-COOH; (d) Pd-Au/Cp-COOH; (e) Pd/Cp-butyl; (f) Pd-Au/Cp-butyl; (g) Pd/Cp-NH2; (h) Pd-Au/Cp-NH2.
Effect of support modification on the contribution of different electronic states of Pd and Au on the catalyst surface calculated according to XPS.
| Catalyst | Pd(0, 2+ or 4+) Relative Content, % | Au(0 or 1+) Relative Content, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pd0
| Pd2+
| Pd4+
| Au0
| Au+
| |
| Pd/Cp | 59 | 23 | 18 | - | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp | 84 | 9 | 7 | 93 | 7 |
| Pd/Cp-COOH | 78 | 14 | 8 | - | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp-COOH | 80 | 12 | 8 | 90 | 10 |
| Pd/Cp-butyl | 83 | 11 | 6 | - | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp-butyl | 83 | 12 | 5 | 93 | 7 |
| Pd/Cp-NH2 | 89 | 8 | 3 | - | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp-NH2 | 91 | 7 | 2 | 92 | 8 |
Surface concentration of elements on the catalyst surface (at.%) determined by XPS.
| Catalyst | Element | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1s | O1s | N1s | Pd3d | Au4f | |
| Pd/Cp | 95.9 | 3.8 | 0.07 | 0.2 | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp | 95.3 | 2.9 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Pd/Cp-COOH | 91.8 | 7.1 | 0.20 | 1.0 | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp-COOH | 93.0 | 5.9 | n.d. | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Pd/Cp-butyl | 94.1 | 4.5 | 0.02 | 1.3 | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp-butyl | 94.2 | 4.2 | 0.17 | 1.1 | 0.4 |
| Pd/Cp-NH2 | 77.1 | 16.8 | 1.69 | 2.7 | - |
| Pd-Au/Cp-NH2 | 81.5 | 13.1 | 1.62 | 2.5 | 1.23 |
Figure 7Au4f XPS spectra of (a) Pd-Au/Cp, (b) Pd-Au/Cp-COOH, (c) Pd-Au/Cp-butyl and (d) Pd-Au/Cp-NH2.
Catalytic results of the hydrogenation of furfural.
| Entry | Catalyst | dm, | Conversion for 5 h, % | Selectivity at 70% of Conversion, % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | THFA | 2-MF | 2-MTHF | IPFE | Others | ||||
| 1 | Pd/Cp | 4.2 | 80 | 33 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 11 |
| 2 | Pd/Cp-butyl | 4.6 | 93 | 55 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
| 3 | Pd/Cp-COOH | 4.2 | 96 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 41 |
| 4 | Pd/Cp-NH2 | 4.4 | 66 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 37 |
| 5 | Pd-Au/Cp | 3.9 | 97 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 69 | 1 |
| 6 | Pd-Au/Cp-butyl | 3.2 | 75 | 74 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 4 |
| 7 | Pd-Au/Cp-COOH | 3.6 | 97 | 54 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 32 | 1 |
| 8 | Pd-Au/Cp-NH2 | 3.4 | 49 | 31 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 49 |
FA—furfuryl alcohol; THFA—tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol; 2-MF—2-methylfuran; 2-MTHF—2 methyltetrahydrofuran; IPFE—isopropyl furfuryl ether; others—furan, tetrahydrofuran, 1,2—pentanediol, etc. Reaction conditions: 0.3 M furfural (0.2882 g) in 10 mL 2-propanol, amount of catalyst 0.0645 g (Pd/furfural = 1:500 mol/mol; Pd-Au/furfural = 1:580 mol/mol), T = 50 °C, pH2 = 5 bar, t = 5 h, stirring 1000 rpm.
Scheme 1Possible products of the furfural hydrogenation.
Figure 8Conversion of furfural in hydrogenation processes over different catalysts. Reaction conditions: 0.3 M furfural (0.2882 g) in 10 mL 2-propanol, amount of catalyst 0.0645 g (Pd/furfural = 1:500 mol/mol; Pd-Au/furfural = 1:580 mol/mol), T = 50 °C, p (H2) = 5 bar, t = 5 h, stirring 1000 rpm.
Figure 9Time evolution of catalytic hydrogenation of furfural: (a) furfuryl alcohol; (b) tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol; (c) 2-methylfuran; (d) 2-methyltetrahydrofuran; (e) isopropyl furfuryl ether; (f) others. Reaction conditions: 0.3 M furfural (0.2882 g) in 10 mL 2-propanol, amount of catalyst 0.0645 g (Pd/furfural = 1:500 mol/mol; Pd-Au/furfural = 1:580 mol/mol), T = 50 °C, pH2 = 5 bar, t = 5 h, stirring 1000 rpm.