| Literature DB >> 35806691 |
Ruidong Wu1,2, Shuning Shi1,2, Yu Shen3, Chen Hu1,2, Mengfei Luo1,2, Zichen Gan1,2, Bin Xiao1,2, Zeyu Wang1,2.
Abstract
Urban construction has produced a large amount of construction waste which has caused huge environmental problems. The sponge city is the development direction of urban construction, and permeable pavement concrete is an important material for sponge city construction. To see the law influencing different factors on the performance of recycled aggregate permeable pavement concrete, different water binder ratios, recycled aggregate particle gradations, ordinary aggregate substitution rates, and fly ash and admixture contents are designed to prepare permeable concrete. The compressive strength, permeability coefficient, frost resistance, and pore structure of permeable concrete are tested. The results show that when the replacement rate of recycled aggregate is 50%, the 28-d strength of concrete with a 0.25 water binder ratio can reach 28.9 MPa, and the permeability coefficient is 13.26 mm/s. The addition of fly ash will reduce the compressive strength, and the permeability coefficient increases first and then decreases with the increase of the fly ash content. When the mass fraction of fly ash instead of cement is 12%, the 28-d strength is 94.8% of that of the cement group, and the permeability coefficient can reach 14.03 mm/s. A water-reducing agent can obviously improve the workability of permeable concrete; the best content of the water-reducing agent is 0.2% of the cement mass. A reasonable amount of fly ash and water-reducing agent can optimize the number of harmless holes and less harmful holes in the concrete to improve the frost resistance and strength after the freeze-thaw, and the frost resistance is F150. This study provides a theoretical basis and technical guarantee for the resource utilization of recycled aggregate in permeable pavement concrete.Entities:
Keywords: construction waste; frost resistance; pavement concrete; permeability coefficient; recycled aggregate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806691 PMCID: PMC9267464 DOI: 10.3390/ma15134566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Mineral composition of cement/%.
| Mineral Composition | C3S | C2S | C3A | C4AF | f-CaO | f-MgO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 61.1 | 18.3 | 7.2 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 1.7 |
Note: The content of gypsum in cement is 2.95–3.0%.
Main performance indexes of cement.
| Project | Density | Loss on Ignition/% | Setting Time/min | Soundness | Compressive Strength/MPa | Flexural Strength/MPa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | 3 d | 28 d | 3 d | 28 d | ||||
| P·O 42.5 | 3.06 | 3.78 | 145 | 210 | Qualified | 32.2 | 53.1 | 5.6 | 7.8 |
Performance indexes of recycled aggregate and ordinary aggregate.
| Sample Name | Bulk Density/(g/cm3) | Apparent Density/(g/cm3) | Porosity | Sediment Percentage/% | Needle Flake Particle Content/% | Crushing Value/% | Water Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | 1.44 | 2.57 | 42.6 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 11.6 | 7.1 |
| OA | 1.46 | 2.45 | 40.3 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 8.7 | 3.6 |
XRF chemical composition analysis of two aggregates/%.
| Chemical Composition | CaO | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | SO3 | Fe2O3 | K2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | 85.47 | 0.83 | 3.77 | 9.02 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 2.27 | 0.97 |
| OA | 55.21 | 0.71 | 12.65 | 17.62 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 1.38 | 0.68 |
Rapid alkali silica reaction expansion rates of two aggregates.
| Sample | 14 d Expansion Rate | Result Judgment |
|---|---|---|
| RA | 0.005% | No potential alkali silica reaction hazard |
| OA | 0.006% | No potential alkali silica reaction hazard |
XRF main chemical composition of fly ash/%.
| Composition | Al2O3 | MgO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | K2O + Na2O | CaO | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction | 25.8 | 1.2 | 52.7 | 9.7 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 4.6 |
Main performance indexes of fly ash.
| Sample | Water Demand Ratio/% | Density/(g/cm3) | Fineness (45 μm Sieve Residue)/% | Specific Surface Area/(m2/kg) | Loss on Ignition/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fly ash | 98 | 2.23 | 8.7 | 441 | 2.2 |
Porosity of different particle size gradation of fully recycled aggregate.
| Small Stone:Large Stone | Small Stones Mass/kg | Large Stones Mass/kg | Volume of Water/L | Voidage/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:8 | 2.25 | 8.80 | 4.85 | 48.5 |
| 3:7 | 3.50 | 8.02 | 4.55 | 45.5 |
| 4:6 | 4.60 | 6.95 | 4.40 | 44.0 |
| 5:5 | 5.82 | 5.79 | 4.25 | 42.5 |
| 6:4 | 7.05 | 4.68 | 4.15 | 41.5 |
| 7:3 | 8.06 | 3.45 | 4.45 | 44.5 |
| 8:2 | 9.20 | 2.35 | 4.50 | 45.0 |
Performance of pervious concrete with different fully recycled aggregate gradation.
| Small Stone:Large Stone | Cement | Total Aggregate | Water | Compressive Strength/MPa | Porosity | Permeability Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | ||||||
| 2:8 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 8.7 | 17.8 | 25.5 | 11 | 10.56 |
| 120 | 8.1 | 15.5 | 20.8 | 14 | 15.53 | |||
| 3:7 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 9.2 | 16.9 | 24.4 | 12 | 12.11 |
| 120 | 8.3 | 15.4 | 20.6 | 14 | 14.53 | |||
| 4:6 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 9.6 | 18.6 | 26.7 | 10 | 10.29 |
| 120 | 8.2 | 16.8 | 21.1 | 13 | 13.96 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 6:4 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 10.2 | 20.1 | 28.6 | 9 | 8.68 |
| 120 | 8.4 | 16.4 | 20.6 | 10 | 10.32 | |||
| 7:3 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 8.3 | 18.8 | 24.9 | 11 | 11.15 |
| 120 | 7.6 | 15.6 | 20.7 | 13 | 13.08 | |||
| 8:2 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 7.3 | 16.5 | 23.9 | 12 | 11.55 |
Concrete mix proportion with different recycled aggregate substitution rates.
| Group | Cement | OA | RA | Water | Compressive Strength/MPa | Porosity | Permeability Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | |||||||
| RA0 |
| 1400 | 0 | 100 | 13.1 | 20.6 | 29.8 | 13 | 13.93 |
| 120 | 10.6 | 18.5 | 24.2 | 14 | 15.12 | ||||
| RA30 | 980 | 420 | 100 | 12.5 | 20.8 | 28.8 | 13 | 13.52 | |
| 120 | 9.8 | 16.8 | 23.3 | 14 | 14.98 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| RA70 | 420 | 980 | 100 | 10.6 | 17.8 | 26.4 | 11 | 11.55 | |
| 120 | 9.0 | 13.9 | 21.1 | 13 | 12.98 | ||||
| RA100 | 0 | 1400 | 100 | 9.8 | 16.4 | 25.5 | 11 | 10.65 | |
| 120 | 8.2 | 12.9 | 20.4 | 12 | 12.31 | ||||
Figure 1Strength of permeable concrete with different replacement rates of recycled aggregate: (a) 0.25 w/c, (b) 0.3 w/c.
Figure 2Water permeability coefficient of concrete with different replacement rates of recycled aggregate.
Mix proportion and performance of permeable concrete with different fly ash content.
| Group | Cement | Fly Ash | Aggregate | Water | Compressive Strength/MPa | Porosity | Permeability Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | |||||||
| FA0 | 400 | 0 | 1400 | 100 | 12.8 | 19.4 | 28.9 | 13 | 13.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FA18 | 328 | 72 | 1400 | 100 | 10.3 | 15.7 | 26.9 | 12 | 12.15 |
| FA24 | 304 | 96 | 1400 | 100 | 9.3 | 13.1 | 22.2 | 12 | 11.53 |
| FA30 | 280 | 120 | 1400 | 100 | 7.9 | 12.6 | 19.1 | 11 | 10.91 |
Figure 3Strength and water permeability coefficient of concrete with different fly ash content: (a) strength, (b) water permeability coefficient.
Mix proportion and performance of permeable concrete with different admixture content.
| Group | PC Content/% | Cement | Aggregate | Water | Compressive Strength/MPa | Porosity | Permeability Coefficient | Slump/mm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | ||||||||
| PC0 | 0 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 12.8 | 19.4 | 28.9 | 13 | 13.26 | 30 |
| PC0.1 | 0.1 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 11.3 | 16.9 | 27.2 | 13 | 13.75 | 45 |
| PC0.2 | 0.2 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 11.6 | 15.8 | 27.6 | 13 | 13.88 | 55 |
| PC0.3 | 0.3 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 11.8 | 15.4 | 24.1 | 13 | 13.83 | 70 |
| PC0.4 | 0.4 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 10.8 | 14.7 | 22.5 | 14 | 13.82 | 95 |
| PC0.5 | 0.5 | 400 | 1400 | 100 | 10.3 | 14.1 | 21.8 | 14 | 13.93 | 110 |
Note: The PC content is the mass ratio of cement.
Mass loss rate of concrete after different freeze–thaw cycles/%.
| Number of Cycles | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | 175 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 4.7 | |
| RA50 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 4.6 |
| |
| RA100 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| ||
| FA12 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| PC0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 4.1 |
|
Note: Bold font is after freeze–thaw damage has occurred.
Residual relative dynamic elastic modulus of concrete after different freeze–thaw cycles/%.
| Number of Cycles | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | 175 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA0 | 95.2 | 90.1 | 83.1 | 77.6 | 70.5 |
| |
| RA50 | 93.8 | 87.2 | 79.5 | 73.1 | 66.5 |
| |
| RA100 | 88.1 | 75.9 | 64.2 | 46.5 |
| ||
| FA12 | 98.1 | 92.5 | 88.7 | 79.6 | 72.2 | 66.4 |
|
| PC0.2 | 96.6 | 91.6 | 85.6 | 73.5 | 68.1 | 62.2 |
|
Note: Bold font is after freeze–thaw damage has occurred.
Compressive strength of concrete after different freeze–thaw cycles/MPa.
| Number of Cycles | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | 175 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA0 | 29.8 | 27.2 | 23.4 | 20.1 | 19.6 | 18.9 | 15.1 | |
| RA50 | 27.9 | 24.8 | 22.2 | 19.5 | 16.1 | 15.5 | 11.6 | |
| RA100 | 27.5 | 22.5 | 18.9 | 15.2 | 13.5 | 10.1 | ||
| FA12 | 27.4 | 26.2 | 24.2 | 23.7 | 21.3 | 20.7 | 19.5 | 18.3 |
| PC0.2 | 27.6 | 26.6 | 22.0 | 21.1 | 20.5 | 18.9 | 18.1 | 16.8 |
Hole structure analysis of concrete/%.
| Total Porosity | <0.02 μm | 0.02–0.1 μm | 0.1–0.2 μm | >0.2 μm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA0 | 12.47 | 4.68 | 1.29 | 0.56 | 5.94 |
| RA50 | 13.73 | 4.24 | 1.13 | 1.21 | 7.15 |
| RA100 | 15.66 | 3.11 | 0.76 | 4.63 | 6.96 |
| FA18 | 11.12 | 6.88 | 1.21 | 0.73 | 2.30 |
| PC0.2 | 11.61 | 5.79 | 0.84 | 1.12 | 3.86 |