| Literature DB >> 35805878 |
Siyu Zhou1, Ziling Ni1, Atsushi Ogihara2, Xiaohe Wang1.
Abstract
The aging transformation of digital health services faces issues of how to distinguish influencing factors, redesign services, and effectively promote measures and policies. In this study, in-depth interviews were conducted, and grounded theory applied to open coding, main axis coding, and selective coding to form concepts and categories. Trajectory equifinality modeling clarified the evolution logic of digital transformation. Based on the theory of service ecology, a digital health service aging model was constructed from the "macro-medium-micro" stages and includes governance, service, and technology transformation paths. The macro stage relies on organizational elements to promote the institutionalization of management and guide the transformation of governance for value realization, including the construction of three categories: mechanism, indemnification, and decision-making. The meso stage relies on service elements to promote service design and realize service transformation that is suitable for aging design, including the construction of three categories: organization, resources, and processes. The micro stage relies on technical elements to practice experiencing humanization, including the construction of three categories: target, methods, and evaluation. These results deepen the understanding of the main behaviors and roles of macro-organizational, meso-service, and micro-technical elements in digital transformation practice and have positive significance for health administrative agencies to implement action strategies.Entities:
Keywords: digital transformation; health service; service ecological theory; suitable for aging; sustainability
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805878 PMCID: PMC9266778 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Framework for digital transformation of public health services.
Figure 2Research procedure of the quantitative research.
Results of factor analysis after rotation.
| Item | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perception of organization | 0.706 | ||
| Perception of service | 0.682 | ||
| Perception of technology | 0.677 | ||
| Identity of organization | 0.676 | ||
| Identity of service | 0.663 | ||
| Identity of technology | 0.641 | ||
| Satisfaction of organization | 0.586 | ||
| Satisfaction of service | 0.570 | ||
| Satisfaction of technology | 0.522 |
Figure 3Research procedure of qualitative research.
Univariate analysis of perception, identity, and satisfaction.
| Items | Perception |
| Identity |
| Satisfaction |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supply or demand side | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Supply side | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | |||
| Demand side | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | |||
| Gender | 0.58 | 0.26 | 0.64 | |||
| Male | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | |||
| Female | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | |||
| Age | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| <40 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | |||
| 40–59 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | |||
| ≥60 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | |||
| Residence | 0.04 | 0.62 | 0.05 | |||
| Living with partner | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | |||
| Living with children | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | |||
| Living alone | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | |||
| Education | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |||
| Primary and below | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | |||
| Junior | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | |||
| High | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | |||
| University and above | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | |||
| Self-rated health | 0.13 | <0.01 | 0.03 | |||
| Healthy | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | |||
| Unhealthy | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 |
Correlation analyses of perception, identity, and satisfaction.
| Supply Side | Demand Side | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perception | Identity | Satisfaction | Perception | Identity | Satisfaction | ||
| Perception | 1 | Perception | 1 | ||||
| Identity | 0.24 | 1 | Identity | 0.69 ** | 1 | ||
| Satisfaction | 0.48 ** | 0.37 ** | 1 | Satisfaction | 0.64 ** | 0.56 ** | 1 |
** p < 0.01.
The logistic regression analysis of perception, identity, and satisfaction.
| Perception OR |
| Identity OR |
| Satisfaction OR |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supply or demand side | ||||||
| Supply side | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Demand side | 19.1 (8.7–45.1) | <0.01 | 5.4 (2.6–10.9) | <0.01 | 3.7 (1.8–7.2) | <0.01 |
| Age | ||||||
| ≥60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 40–59 | 10.4 (4.2–25.1) | <0.01 | 3.9 (1.7–8.9) | <0.01 | 1.9 (0.8–4.2) | 0.09 |
| <40 | 116 (14.7–909.5) | <0.01 | 8.6 (3.0–24.7) | <0.01 | 11.2 (3.6–34.9) | <0.01 |
| Residence | ||||||
| Living alone | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Living with partner | 3.2 (0.3–30.2) | 0.08 | 1.6 (0.2–10.2) | 0.06 | 3.7 (0.4–34.1) | 0.24 |
| Living with children | 8.8 (0.7–99.2) | 0.29 | 2.5 (0.3–19.5) | 0.38 | 12 (1.1–141.3) | 0.04 |
| Education | ||||||
| Primary and below | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Junior | 0.4 (0.1–1.5) | 0.85 | 0.6 (0.2–1.7) | 0.36 | 1.2 (0.4–3.7) | 0.66 |
| High | 0.9 (0.3–2.5) | 0.19 | 0.8 (0.3–2.2) | 0.74 | 1.1 (0.4–2.9) | 0.88 |
| University and above | 8.2 (2.9–22.8) | <0.01 | 3.1 (1.2–7.9) | 0.02 | 4.1 (1.5–10.6) | <0.01 |
| Self-rated health | ||||||
| Healthy | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Unhealthy | 3.9 (1.7–8.8) | <0.01 | 2.3 (1.1–4.7) | 0.02 | 0.6 (0.3–1.2) | 0.15 |
Supply-side interviewer information.
| No. | Job | Gender | Age | Working Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Community manager | Female | 40 | 10 |
| 2 | Community manager | Female | 28 | 5 |
| 3 | Community manager | Female | 55 | 36 |
| 4 | Community manager | Female | 42 | 14 |
| 5 | Community manager | Male | 30 | 6 |
| 6 | Family doctor | Male | 45 | 18 |
| 7 | Family doctor | Female | 40 | 16 |
| 8 | Family doctor | Male | 36 | 8 |
| 9 | Family doctor | Female | 52 | 26 |
| 10 | Family doctor | Female | 47 | 23 |
| 11 | Service personnel | Male | 44 | 6 |
| 12 | Service personnel | Female | 32 | 2 |
| 13 | Service personnel | Female | 56 | 6 |
| 14 | Volunteer | Female | 56 | 6 |
| 15 | Volunteer | Female | 55 | 5 |
| 16 | Volunteer | Female | 50 | 2 |
| 17 | IT developer | Male | 27 | 5 |
| 18 | IT developer | Male | 34 | 8 |
| 19 | IT developer | Male | 30 | 6 |
| 20 | IT developer | Male | 30 | 5 |
Figure 4Time-series path of supply-side-based digital health service aging transformation.
Demand-side interviewer information.
| No. | Gender | Age | Years of Residence | Utilization of Digital Health Services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 62 | 22 | Telehealth, Electronic health monitoring |
| 2 | Female | 63 | 14 | Online health consultation |
| 3 | Male | 82 | 34 | Wearable devices, Online health consultation |
| 4 | Female | 71 | 28 | Telehealth |
| 5 | Female | 72 | 22 | Telehealth, Wearable devices |
| 6 | Female | 73 | 28 | Online health consultation |
| 7 | Female | 62 | 6 | Online health consultation |
| 8 | Male | 82 | 32 | Telehealth |
| 9 | Male | 77 | 24 | Medication reminder, Online health education |
| 10 | Female | 72 | 25 | Online health consultation |
| 11 | Female | 78 | 15 | Wearable devices, Electronic health monitoring |
| 12 | Female | 67 | 26 | Online health education |
| 13 | Male | 81 | 13 | Telehealth |
| 14 | Male | 80 | 17 | Online health consultation |
| 15 | Male | 67 | 22 | Wearable devices, Online health education |
| 16 | Female | 63 | 10 | Online psychological consultation |
| 17 | Female | 65 | 9 | Telehealth |
| 18 | Male | 63 | 20 | Online health consultation, Medication reminder |
| 19 | Male | 75 | 12 | Online health education |
| 20 | Female | 81 | 32 | Online health education |
| 21 | Male | 81 | 27 | Online health consultation |
| 22 | Female | 65 | 11 | Telehealth, Wearable devices |
| 23 | Female | 76 | 25 | Online health consultation |
| 24 | Female | 72 | 22 | Online health consultation |
Figure 5Time-series path of demand-side-based digital health service aging transformation.
Concepts and categories formed by open coding.
| Categories | Concepts |
|---|---|
| Establish working mechanism | Establish digital teams, clarify project division, establish an information reporting system, regular meetings, establish project teams, select young managers, establish an analysis system, determine work procedures. |
| Collaboration with grassroots departments | Multi-community collaboration, community meeting room sharing, building management cooperation, service experience sharing, unified security management, service group notification, vaccination records. |
| Multi-agency coordination | Two-way referral service, appointment registration, nurse communication, the elderly health service coordination, family doctor team, welfare supplies on behalf of others, drug distribution, the elderly housekeeping services. |
| Supervision and feedback | Set up feedback mailbox, work progress report, confirm partner authority, information release review, service effect evaluation, service content feedback, leadership reception day. |
| Organizational capacity building | Digital discussion meeting, organizational communication meeting, digital thinking, brainstorming, project discussion, Dingding App daily report, WeChat App operation, expert consultation. |
| Digital resource sharing | Data sharing, data backup, data traceability, community information registration, SMS reminder, service record synchronization, information covering the whole community. |
| The elderly service design | Enlarge fonts, slow down processes, amplify notification sounds, health and wellness knowledge, free health lectures, traditional Chinese medicine services, regular telephone calls. |
| Seek external human resources | Volunteer participation, college students caring for the elderly, provision of sphygmomanometer, public welfare promotion, business preferential services. |
| Digital service process | Use mobile phones throughout the process, paperless, telemedicine, Dingding video, QR code service, electronic health code, electronic medical insurance card, smart registration, electronic health record. |
| Service staff support | Guidance for appointment registration, medical reminder, department guidance, electronic signboard, electronic questionnaire, electronic equipment guidance. |
| Digital transformation training | Digital training, development of new digital functions, daily Dingding report, entry of electronic information records, mobile phone training for the elderly. |
| Digital security | Risk control, personal information privacy, information collection protocol, electronic police, infrared smoke sensor, focus on key groups, prevention of telecommunication fraud. |
| Use of digital devices | Use of registration APP, use of self-service registration machines, wearing of smart wristbands, electronic test list printer, electronic triage, electronic hospital guidance. |
| Digital effect evaluation | Decreased medical satisfaction, decreased medical time, increased risk, difficulty with electronic use, insufficient health reminders. |
| Digital perception | Willing to go to a community health service center, unwilling to go to a general hospital, weak experience, not suitable for the elderly, complex digital operations. |
| Digital popularization | Door-to-door support from social workers, distribution of mobile phones for the elderly, telephone notification for the elderly, registration to receive gifts. |
| Family member support | Electronic family network, family member early warning notice, family member teaching, family member accompanying medical treatment. |
| Community health | Chronic diseases, traditional Chinese medicine, vaccination, epidemic prevention and control, first aid measures, AED first aid. |
The categories and relational connotations of the axial coding.
| Main Categories | Subcategories | Concept Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| A. Institutionalization of digital health service transformation | A1 Establish working mechanism | Establishing a working mechanism is the guarantee of digital transformation |
| A2 Collaboration with grassroots departments | Collaboration between grassroots departments is the internal consensus of digital transformation | |
| A3 Multi-agency coordination | Multi-agency coordination is the premise to meet the diverse health needs of the elderly | |
| A4 Supervision and feedback | Monitoring and feedback ensure that the organization’s risks can be controlled | |
| A5 Organizational capacity building | Organizational capacity building is the internal driving force for digital transformation | |
| A6 Digital resource sharing | Digital resource sharing is the data foundation for digital transformation | |
| B. Digital health service transformation service redesign | B1 The elderly service design | Age-friendly service design is the goal of digital transformation |
| B2 Seek external human resources | External resources can expand digital transformation resources | |
| B3 Digital service process | Digital service process is a direct manifestation of digital transformation | |
| B4 Service staff support | Service personnel promote humanistic care under digital transformation | |
| B5 Digital transformation training | Digital transformation training enhances digital capabilities at different stages | |
| B6 Digital security | Digital security is the premise of digital transformation | |
| C. Digital health service transformation experience evaluation | C1 Use of digital devices | Digital device usage is an enabling tool for digital transformation |
| C2 Digital effect evaluation | Digital effect evaluation reflects the recognition of the elderly | |
| C3 Digital perception | Digital perception experience is the source of service optimization | |
| C4 Digital popularization | Digital popularization can expand the value of digital transformation | |
| C5 Family member support | Family member support is a family requirement for the elderly to embrace digital | |
| C6 Community health | Community health is final result of digital transformation |
Figure 6Age-appropriate transformation model of digital health services.