| Literature DB >> 35805634 |
Ardvin Kester S Ong1, Yogi Tri Prasetyo1,2, Nattakit Yuduang1,3, Reny Nadlifatin4, Satria Fadil Persada5, Kirstien Paola E Robas1, Thanatorn Chuenyindee6, Thapanat Buaphiban6.
Abstract
With the constant mutation of COVID-19 variants, the need to reduce the spread should be explored. MorChana is a mobile application utilized in Thailand to help mitigate the spread of the virus. This study aimed to explore factors affecting the actual use (AU) of the application through the use of machine learning algorithms (MLA) such as Random Forest Classifier (RFC) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). An integrated Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) were considered. Using convenience sampling, a total of 907 valid responses from those who answered the online survey were voluntarily gathered. With 93.00% and 98.12% accuracy from RFC and ANN, it was seen that hedonic motivation and facilitating conditions were seen to be factors affecting very high AU; while habit and understanding led to high AU. It was seen that when people understand the impact and causes of the COVID-19 pandemic's aftermath, its severity, and also see a way to reduce it, it would lead to the actual usage of a system. The findings of this study could be used by developers, the government, and stakeholders to capitalize on using the health-related applications with the intention of increasing actual usage. The framework and methodology used presented a way to evaluate health-related technologies. Moreover, the developing trends of using MLA for evaluating human behavior-related studies were further justified in this study. It is suggested that MLA could be utilized to assess factors affecting human behavior and technology used worldwide.Entities:
Keywords: artificial neural network; contact tracing; human behavior; machine learning algorithm; random forest classifier
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805634 PMCID: PMC9265314 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Literature Review.
| Author | COVID-19 Contact Tracing/Country | Method | Purpose | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altman et al. [ | France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, and United States | Multivariate regression analysis | Investigated the user acceptability of a contact-tracing app in five countries hit by the pandemic. | -strong support for the app under both regimes, in all countries, across all subgroups of the population, and irrespective of regional-level COVID-19 mortality rates |
| Shahroz et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Comprehensive review analysis | To conduct a comprehensive analysis of digital contact tracing and its supporting IoT framework. | -Different countries and applications have made different trade-offs and have therefore experienced different amounts of success in effectively combating COVID-19. |
| Nazayer et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Comprehensive review analysis | Examine design decisions related to COVID-19 contact-tracing applications and the implications of these decisions. | -Based on the used technology and the software architecture, different contact-tracing applications offer different possible trade-offs that should be taken into account based on government’s objectives on contact tracing. |
| Zhang et al. [ | COVIDSafe (Australia); BeAware (Bahrain); CoronApp (Chile); GH COVID-19 Tracker (Ghana); Rakning C-19 (Iceland); NZ COVID Tracer (New Zealand); TraceTogether (Singapore) | Readability analysis | Examined the readability of privacy policies of contact-tracings apps | -Explanation used in the privacy policies of these apps require considerably higher than the reading ability of the average individual. |
| Seto et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Comprehensive review analysis | Analyzed how characteristics of contract tracing and exposure notification apps contribute to the perceived levels of privacy awarded to citizens and how this affects an app’s effectiveness | -Striking the right balance between privacy and effectiveness requires careful consideration, especially as the urgency to reduce transmission of the virus evolves based on fluctuating case numbers and vaccination efforts. |
| Vogt et al. [ | COVIDSafe (New South Wales, Australia) | Prospective study | To assess the effectiveness of the app to detect close contacts and prevent public exposure events, and its usefulness during the contact identification and risk assessment process | -COVIDSafe generated a substantial additional perceived workload for public health staff and was not considered useful. |
| Oyibo et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Comprehensive review analysis | To uncover the key factors that facilitate or militate against the adoption of CTAs, which researchers, designers and other stakeholders should focus on in future iterations to increase their adoption and effectiveness | -Priority to privacy protection through minimal data collection and transparency, improving contact tracing benefits (personal and social), and fostering trust through laudable gestures such as delegating contact tracing to public health authorities, making source code publicly available and stating who will access user data, when, how, and what it will be used for. |
| Owusu [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Comprehensive review analysis | To review and recommend evaluation of COVID-19 contact tracing applications. | -as with any new system, strong regulatory frameworks are necessary to ensure that individual information is not used for surveillance purposes, and user privacy will be maintained. Having safeguarded this, perhaps the global health community will witness the beginning of a new era of implementing mass health programs through the medium of digital technology. |
| Zetterholm et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Comprehensive review analysis | To describe the current knowledge about public acceptance of CTAs and identify individual perspectives, which are essential to consider concerning CTA acceptance and adoption | -Public acceptance varies across national cultures and sociodemographic strata. Lower acceptance among people who are mistrusting, socially disadvantaged, or those with low technical skills suggest a risk that CTAs may amplify existing inequities. |
| Gupta et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Structured research review-based framework | -To review various components of the framework that are related to technological working, design architecture, and feature analysis of the applications, along with the analysis of the acceptance of such applications worldwide. | This study acted as a guide for the users researching contact tracings applications using the proposed four-layered framework for their app assessment. |
| Kostka and Habich-Sobiegalla [ | China, Germany, and the United States. | Linear Regression | Analyze public perceptions toward CTAs and the factors that drive CTA acceptance in China, Germany, and the United States. | -Citizens are willing to accept digital contact tracing despite concerns about privacy infringement and government surveillance, as long as the apps are perceived as effective in lowering infection rates and providing health information. |
| Vogt et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Systematic Review | To present a protocol for a systematic review of the main factors, including facilitators and barriers, that influence the adoption of contact tracing apps. | Focus on the principal adoption factors necessary to create better and more effective contact tracing apps. |
| Albastaki [ | Bahrain | Structural Equation Modeling | Considered human task performance measures, technology acceptance model, and system usability scale to evaluate perceived usability. | Usability in general rather than factors affecting behavior for utility was the most significant factor. |
| Storni et al. [ | General COVID-19 contact tracing. | Systematic Review | Evaluated frameworks used to assess the usability of contact tracing applications. | Highlighted that usability pillars such as satisfaction, availability, accessibility, flexibility, effectiveness, interaction, and ongoing application evaluations were factors that needed to be considered. |
| Winter et al. [ | Germany | Eye-tracking and a retrospective think-aloud approach | Evaluated eye tracking and think aloud approach for perceived usability. | They have only concluded that the application is promising and privacy policy has the most significant factor affecting its usability. |
| Blacklow et al. [ | United States. | Thematic Analysis | To evaluate the usability using thematic analysis. | Lacked a lot of analysis to be generalized among other contact tracing mobile applications. |
| Chuenyindee et al. [ | ThaiChana (Thailand) | Structural Equation Modeling | To determine factors affecting the perceived usability of Thai Chana by integrating protection motivation theory, the extended technology acceptance model, and the system usability scale. | -understanding of COVID-19 has significant effects on perceived severity and perceived vulnerability, which subsequently leads to perceived usefulness. In addition, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have significant direct effects on attitude, which subsequently leads to the intention to use, actual use, and perceived usability. |
| Yuduang et al. [ | MorChana (Thailand) | Structural Equation Modeling | To evaluate the factors affecting the actual usage of the MorChana mobile application. | Intention was seen to be the most significant indicator. Further evaluation was recommended due to limitations set by the method utilized. |
| Bente et al. [ | CoronaMedler application (Netherlands) | Think-aloud usability test and eye-tracking. | To assess usability of the COVID-19 contact tracing application in Netherlands. | -Easy to use, but several demographics found it difficult to interpret, had low trust in privacy, and has been evaluated as underprepared. |
| This study | ThaiChana (Thailand) | Machine Learning Ensemble | To evaluate factors affecting perceived usability of the COVID-19 contact tracing application. | Comapred to the results obtained from Yuduang et al. [ |
Figure 1Theoretical Framework.
Figure 2Methodological Flowchart.
Figure 3ANN Operation.
Figure 4Descriptive Statistics of Age and Gender.
Figure 5Descriptive Statistics of Income and Education.
Validity and Multicollinearity.
| Construct | Cronbach’s Alpha | VIF |
|---|---|---|
| HB | 0.904 | 4.576 |
| HM | 0.889 | 4.312 |
| PR | 0.951 | 3.628 |
| FC | 0.856 | 3.111 |
| U | 0.851 | 1.341 |
| PE | 0.753 | 2.166 |
| SEF | 0.875 | 2.160 |
| IU | 0.802 | 3.084 |
| TR | 0.855 | 2.605 |
| EE | 0.885 | 2.071 |
| PCR | 0.705 | 1.161 |
| SI | 0.946 | 3.323 |
Decision Tree Mean Accuracy (Depth = 5).
| Category | 60:40 | 70:30 | 80:20 | 90:10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 84.00 | 80.00 | 83.20 | 83.60 |
|
| 4.301 | 4.743 | 4.438 | 6.542 |
|
| 81.40 | 77.00 | 82.80 | 83.20 |
|
| 75.40 | 73.20 | 80.00 | 72.80 |
|
| 85.00 | 80.60 | 86.00 | 84.80 |
|
| 1.732 | 2.510 | 1.225 | 7.430 |
|
| 84.80 | 81.00 | 85.80 | 79.80 |
|
| 83.40 | 74.20 | 81.80 | 63.80 |
|
| ||||
|
| 88.80 | 83.80 | 93.00 | 91.00 |
|
| 0.447 | 1.095 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
| 86.80 | 82.80 | 92.80 | 91.40 |
|
| 84.60 | 81.40 | 90.60 | 89.80 |
|
| 83.20 | 84.60 | 89.40 | 92.00 |
|
| 1.095 | 0.894 | 0.547 | 0.000 |
|
| 83.00 | 82.80 | 89.80 | 90.00 |
|
| 83.00 | 83.80 | 89.60 | 91.00 |
Figure 6Optimum Random Forest Classifier.
Figure 7ANN Results of Training and Testing Accuracies.
Figure 8Training and Validation Loss of ANN.
Figure 9Score of Importance.
Pearson’s R Correlation.
| Latent | HB | HM | PCR | FC | U | PE | SEF | IU | TR | EE | PR | SI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 0.866 | |||||||||||
| PCR | 0.344 | 0.329 | ||||||||||
| FC | 0.787 | 0.777 | 0.305 | |||||||||
| U | 0.479 | 0.487 | 0.193 | 0.417 | ||||||||
| PE | 0.694 | 0.681 | 0.309 | 0.625 | 0.381 | |||||||
| SEF | 0.693 | 0.678 | 0.247 | 0.612 | 0.399 | 0.567 | ||||||
| IU | 0.787 | 0.764 | 0.306 | 0.701 | 0.418 | 0.620 | 0.592 | |||||
| TR | 0.745 | 0.740 | 0.269 | 0.657 | 0.385 | 0.607 | 0.594 | 0.678 | ||||
| EE | 0.692 | 0.657 | 0.274 | 0.607 | 0.393 | 0.534 | 0.579 | 0.602 | 0.616 | |||
| PR | 0.812 | 0.789 | 0.337 | 0.719 | 0.446 | 0.639 | 0.642 | 0.726 | 0.691 | 0.616 | ||
| SI | 0.800 | 0.777 | 0.310 | 0.708 | 0.426 | 0.639 | 0.625 | 0.715 | 0.664 | 0.617 | 0.749 | |
| AU | 0.847 | 0.831 | 0.602 | 0.760 | 0.761 | 0.702 | 0.675 | 0.568 | 0.363 | 0.432 | 0.460 | 0.333 |