| Literature DB >> 35805611 |
Hellen Dayane Silva Borges1, Ana Carolina Morais Oliveira-Scussel1,2, Ângela Maria Morais Oliveira3, Vânia Olivetti Steffen Abdallah4, Ana Cláudia Arantes Marquez Pajuaba1, José Roberto Mineo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular parasite that can infect several species, including humans, and can cause severe damage to the fetus when the infection occurs during pregnancy. The environment and/or food contamination are critical to spreading the infection. Human milk is rich in nutrients and bioactive elements that provide growth and development of the immune system of the newborn. All isotypes of immunoglobulins are present in human colostrum and they are produced from systemic or local sources. Breastfeeding protects the infant against various pathogens, but there is no conclusive study to detect IgG subclasses in colostrum against T. gondii. Therefore, the aim of this study was to detect and evaluate the presence of antibody isotypes against T. gondii in paired samples of serum and colostrum.Entities:
Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii; antibody isotypes; colostrum; serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805611 PMCID: PMC9265988 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Levels of IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies against T. gondii. Data determined by ELISA index (EI), in paired samples of serum and colostrum of postpartum women (n = 283). The solid lines represent the median values of the IE for each reaction and the dashed line the cut-off value (EI = 1.2). Differences between EI levels were calculated by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (**** p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Levels of IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4 antibodies against T. gondii. Data determined by ELISA index (EI), in serum and colostrum samples from 130 puerperal women. The dashed line represents the cut-off value (EI = 1.2). The solid lines represent the values of the medians of the EI for each reaction. Differences between EI levels were calculated by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001). The differences between the levels of positivity (%) (a and b) of the samples were calculated using the Fisher’s exact test. Equal letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Correlation between levels of IgG1 (A), IgG3 (B), and IgG4 (C) antibody subclasses against T. gondii. Data determined by ELISA index (IE) present in paired serum and colostrum samples of 130 puerperal women. Dashed lines indicate the positivity cut off value (IE > 1.2). Double-positive, double-negative, or single-positive percentages are indicated in each corresponding corner. Correlation coefficients (r) were calculated by Spearman correlation test (p < 0.05).
Association among the levels of IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4 subclasses specific to T. gondii and IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes in serum and colostrum samples from 123 puerperal women from Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. Data are presented in number (n) and percentage (%) of the analyzed samples.
| Serum | Colostrum | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Association of | IgG1 | IgG3 | IgG4 | IgG1 | IgG3 | IgG4 | |
| +/+/+ | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | |
| +/+/− | 10 (100) | 5 (50.0) | 4 (40.0) | 7 (70.0) | 9 (90.0) | 3 (30.0) | |
| +/−/− | 109 (98.2) | 59 (53.2) | 50 (44.1) | 60 (54.1) | 85 (76.6) | 39 (35.1) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 4Levels of IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4 antibody subclasses against T. gondii in groups of paired samples. Data determined by ELISA index (IE), present in paired serum and colostrum samples. (A) Group II: levels of anti-T. gondii IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4 subclasses, of 10 samples from positive puerperal women for IgG and IgM antibodies specific to T. gondii. (B) Group III: levels of anti-T. gondii IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4 subclasses, in samples from 111 puerperal women with chronic toxoplasmosis. The dashed line represents the cut-off value (EI = 1.2). The solid lines represent the values of EI medians for each reaction. Differences between EI levels were calculated by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. The differences between the levels of positivity (%) (a and b) of the samples were calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Equal letters indicate significance (p < 0.05).
Diagnosis status from 130 serum and colostrum samples of puerperal women from Uberlândia, MG.
| Chronic Phase | Early Acute Phase | Convalescent Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IgG+ | IgG3/IgG1 > 1 | IgG3/IgG1 < 1 | |
|
| 117 (90.0%) | 1 (0.77%) | 12 (9.23%) |
| 115 (88.46%) | 6 (4.62%) | 9 (6.92%) |
Brazil. Data are presented in number (n) and percentage (%) of the analyzed samples.
Results of IgM and IgA levels in addition to IgG3/IgG1 ratios in serum and colostrum samples from 16 cases of puerperal women with acute status diagnosis in serum or colostrum samples.
| SERUM | COLOSTRUM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| IgG3/IgG1 Ratio | IgM | IgA | Diagnosis Status | IgG3/IgG1 Ratio | IgM | IgA | Diagnosis Status |
| 1 | 0.31 | Neg (0.59) | Neg (0.55) | Chronic infection | 0.14 | Pos (1.26) | Neg (0.78) | Convalescent phase |
| 2 | 0.25 | Pos (1.58) | Neg (0.67) | Convalescent phase | 0.43 | Pos (1.32) | Neg (0.82) | Convalescent phase |
| 3 | 1.16 | Pos (3.14) | Neg (0.69) | Early acute infection | 0.88 | Pos (1.35) | Neg (0.99) | Convalescent phase |
| 4 | 0.24 | Pos (3.36) | Neg (1.01) | Convalescent phase | 2.86 | Pos (3.11) | Neg (0.81) | Early acute infection |
| 5 | 0.75 | Pos (2.76) | Pos (1.85) | Convalescent phase | 7.07 | Pos (3.86) | Pos (1.82) | Early acute infection |
| 6 | 0.21 | Pos (1.93) | Neg (1.07) | Convalescent phase | 0.64 | Pos (1.28) | Neg (0.71) | Convalescent phase |
| 7 | 0.34 | Pos (2.29) | Pos (2.77) | Convalescent phase | 0.29 | Pos (1.24) | Pos (1.30) | Convalescent phase |
| 8 | 0.55 | Pos (1.62) | Neg (0.64) | Convalescent phase | 0.50 | Pos (1.52) | Neg (0.83) | Convalescent phase |
| 9 | 0.15 | Pos (3.30) | Neg (1.12) | Convalescent phase | 1.03 | Pos (1.82) | Neg (0.82) | Early acute infection |
| 10 | 0.12 | Neg (0.63) | Neg (0.86) | Chronic infection | 0.32 | Pos (1.94) | Neg (0.82) | Convalescent phase |
| 11 | 0.63 | Pos (1.66) | Neg (0.88) | Convalescent phase | 1.23 | Pos (1.29) | Neg (0.86) | Early acute infection |
| 12 | 0.12 | Pos (2.18) | Neg (0.77) | Convalescent phase | 0.28 | Pos (1.22) | Neg (0.86) | Convalescent phase |
| 13 | 0.27 | Pos (2.28) | Neg (1.01) | Convalescent phase | 3.11 | Pos (1.61) | Neg (0.90) | Early acute infection |
| 14 | 0.19 | Neg (1.18) | Neg (0.88) | Chronic infection | 0.43 | Pos (1.35) | Neg (0.72) | Convalescent phase |
| 15 | 0.30 | Pos (1.91) | Neg (0.87) | Convalescent phase | 4.02 | Pos (1.25) | Neg (0.58) | Early acute infection |
| 16 | 0.12 | Pos (2.15) | Neg (1.08) | Convalescent phase | 0.29 | Neg (0.97) | Neg (0.91) | Chronic infection |