| Literature DB >> 35805562 |
Daniel Pruchniewicz1, Ludwik Żołnierz1.
Abstract
Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth is one of the most expansive clonal grass species. Despite many publications about its biology, the expansive mechanism of C. epigejos is relatively unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine: I. the dependency between Calamagrostis epigejos ramet density, habitat properties, and the biometric variability of the species; II. the relation between clone architecture and the diversity parameters and the productivity of grassland biocoenoses; III. the expansion strategy of Calamagrostis epigejos within mesic meadows, representing three stages of degradation. The research was conducted in the Central Sudetes (SW Poland). Ten transects were selected for the study, each representing Arrhenatheretalia-type meadows with patches degraded as a result of Calamagrostis epigejos expansion:initial, intermediate, and advanced. The phalanx strategy was observed within the studied range of the Calamagrostis epigejos expansion in the mesic mountain meadows. The study showed no relation between the Calamagrostis epigejos expansion and the phenomenon of ramet self-thinning, though it noted the influence of the habitat on the variability of its biometric features.Entities:
Keywords: degradation of vegetation; growth strategy; self-thinning; species diversity; wood small-reed
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805562 PMCID: PMC9265864 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Mean values of the biometric parameters of Calamagrostis epigejos (±SE) in successive stages of its expansion. Different letters in each column (a, b) show significant differences obtained after the Kruskal–Wallis test (p ≤ 0.05).
| Stage of Expansion: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial (1 m) | Intermediate (5 m) | Advanced (10 m) | |
| Ramet density | 219.20 ± 32.62 a | 509.00 ± 53.46 b | 552.90 ± 33.12 b |
| Ramet height | 89.61 ± 6.82 | 92.28 ± 6.47 | 95.86 ± 6.82 |
| Culm mass | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 1.16 ± 0.09 |
| Culm diameter | 2.31 ± 0.18 | 2.60 ± 0.14 | 2.36 ± 0.13 |
| Leaf mass | 0.73 ± 0.49 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.46 |
| Leaf number | 2.07 ± 0.08 | 2.20 ± 0.10 | 2.17 ± 0.15 |
| Aboveground vegetative mass | 1.87 ± 0.48 | 1.24 ± 0.07 | 1.84 ± 0.44 |
| Panicle length | 16.90 ± 1.47 | 15.13 ± 1.22 | 16.93 ± 1.26 |
| Panicle mass | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.05 |
| Runner mass | 347.78 ± 24.14 | 462.72 ± 69.83 | 437.12 ± 56.54 |
Figure 1Ordination of biometric parameters of Calamagrostis epigejos in the space of two PCA axes.
Results of multiple regression analysis (stepwise progressive method) of Calamagrostis epigejos biometric parameters and the total number of species. The analyses were conducted for standardized and ln variables.
| BETA | r | R2 | F | df |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Number of Species (s) | ||||||
| Ramet density | −0.542 | −0.600 | 0.020 | 5.949 | 4.25 | 0.0017 |
| Ramet culm mass | −0.532 | −0.535 | 0.274 | |||
Multiple regression results for biometric parameters of Calamagrostis epigejos and habitat factors. The analyses were conducted for ln and transformed variables.
| BETA | r | R2 | F | df |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graminoid biomass | −0.632 | −0.632 | 0.399 | 18.630 | 1.280 | <0.001 |
| Ramet density | ||||||
| Graminoid biomass | −0.463 | −0.531 | 0.514 | 5.087 | 5.240 | 0.002 |
| pH | −0.667 | −0.576 | ||||
| Ramet height | ||||||
| Ca | 0.282 | 0.412 | 0.822 | 17.770 | 6.230 | <0.001 |
| Necromass | −0.823 | −0.730 | ||||
| Soil depth | 0.879 | 0.670 | ||||
| pH | −0.407 | −0.466 | ||||
| Ramet culm mass | ||||||
| Necromass | −0.709 | −0.591 | 0.451 | 7.120 | 3.260 | 0.001 |
| Soil depth | 1.315 | 0.621 | ||||
| K | −0.795 | −0.467 | ||||
| Culm diameter | ||||||
| Non-significant (ns) | ns | ns | 0.474 | 7.804 | 3.260 | <0.001 |
| Leaf mass | ||||||
| Soil depth | −0.982 | −0.399 | 0.329 | 3.075 | 4.250 | 0.034 |
| Leaf number | ||||||
| N | 0.623 | 0.572 | 0.404 | 5.873 | 3.260 | 0.003 |
| Forbs biomass | 0.444 | 0.447 | ||||
| Heat load | 0.349 | 0.409 | ||||
| Vegetative mass | ||||||
| Non-significant (ns) | ns | ns | 0.225 | 2.524 | 3.260 | 0.080 |
| Panicle length | ||||||
| Heat load | −1.402 | −0.674 | 0.779 | 16.911 | 5.240 | <0.001 |
| pH | 0.287 | 0.394 | ||||
| Panicle mass | ||||||
| Heat-load | −3.164 | −0.719 | 0.789 | 6.130 | 11.180 | <0.001 |
| Necromass | 2.197 | 0.697 | ||||
| K | −0.938 | −0.630 | ||||
| Forbs biomass | 0.524 | 0.555 | ||||
| N | 0.471 | 0.551 | ||||
| Runner mass | ||||||
| pH | −0.673 | −0.770 | 0.863 | 19.783 | 7.220 | <0.001 |
| Heat load | 0.477 | 0.657 | ||||
| Total graminoids and forbs biomass | −0.312 | −0.612 | ||||
| Soil depth | −1.256 | −0.770 | ||||
| K | 0.722 | 0.649 | ||||
|
| −0.564 | −0.549 | ||||
Figure 2Mean values of Moran’s I coefficient for four resolution scales: 1 × 1 cm (a), 2.5 × 2.5 cm (b), 5 × 5 cm (c), and 7.5 × 7.5 cm (d). Means with standard error values (boxes) and confidence intervals (whiskers) for plots are given. Different letters indicate significant differences obtained after Tukey’s test or the Kruskal–Wallis test (p ≤ 0.05).