| Literature DB >> 35805265 |
Xue Wang1, Ang Li2,3, Qun Xu2,3.
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are considered to be endocrine disruptors. In this study, the evidence on the association between PAHs and diabetes was systematically reviewed. PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting the association between PAHs and diabetes. Of the 698 articles identified through the search, nine cross-sectional studies were included. Seven were conducted in the general population and two in coke oven workers. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to calculate the total effect. Subgroup analysis was further carried out according to the types of PAH metabolites. The results showed that the odds of diabetes were significantly higher for the highest category of urinary naphthalene (NAP), fluorine (FLU), phenanthrene (PHEN), and total mono-hydroxylated (OH-PAH) metabolites compared to the lowest category. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 1.52 (95%CI: 1.19, 1.94), 1.53 (95%CI: 1.36, 1.71), 1.43 (95%CI: 1.28, 1.60), and 1.49 (95%CI: 1.07, 2.08), respectively. In coke oven workers, 4-hydroxyphenanthrene (4-OHPh) was significantly correlated with an increased risk of diabetes. Exposure measurements, outcome definitions, and adjustment for confounders were heterogeneous between studies. The results of the current study demonstrate a potentially adverse effect of PAHs on diabetes. Further mechanistic studies and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm whether PAH metabolite levels are causative, and hence associative, with increased diabetes incidences.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; environmental pollutants; mono-hydroxylated PAHs (OH-PAHs); polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805265 PMCID: PMC9265723 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Results of systematic literature search.
Description of the included studies.
| Study ID | Location | Study Period (Years) | Population ( | Age (Years) | Urinary PAH Metabolites | Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Alshaarawy et al., 2014 [ | USA | 2001–2002 2003–2004 2005–2006 | 3326 | 20–65 | 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 3-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 3-OHPh, and 1-OHP | Capillary gas chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) |
| Yang et al., 2014 [ | China | 2011 | 3092 | 18–90 | 1-OHP, 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 9-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 3-OHPh, 4-OHPh, 9-OHPh, 6-OHChr, and 3-OHBaP (6-OHChr and 3-OHBaP were below the limits of quantification) | Gas chromatographye mass spectrometry (GC/MS) |
| Ranjbar et al., 2015 [ | USA | 2001–2008 | 4765 | ≥20 | 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 3-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 3-OHPh, and 1-OHP | Capillary gas chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) |
| Smith et al., 2018 [ | USA | 2005–2014 | 8664 | adults and children | 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 3-OHFlu, 9-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 3-OHPh, and 1-OHP | Gas and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry |
| Cheng et al., 2021 [ | China | 2011.04~05, 2012.05 | 3031 | 18–80 | 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 9-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 3-OHPh, 4-OHPh, 9-OHPh, and 1-OHP. | Agilent 5975B/6890 N GCeMS System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) |
| Nam et al., 2020 [ | Korea | 2012–2014 | 6478 | ≥19 | 1-OHP, 2-OHNa, 1-OHPh, and 2-OHFlu | Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Clarus 680T, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) |
| Lee et al., 2022 [ | Korea | 2015–2017 | OH-PAHs except for 1-OHPhe ( | ≥19 | 1-OHP, 2-OHNa, 1-OHPh, and 2-OHFlu | Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry |
|
| ||||||
| Yang et al., 2017 [ | China | 2010–2014 | 1472 | 47.6 ± 7.1 for diabetic patients | 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 9-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 3-OHPh, 4-OHPh, 9-OHPh, 1-OHP, 6-OHChr, 3-OHBaP | Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) |
| Zhang et al., 2020 [ | China | 2017 | 682 | 31–48 | 1-OHNa, 2-OHNa, 2-OHFlu, 3-OHFlu, 1-OHPh, 2-OHPh, 9-OHPh, 1-OHP, 3-OHChr, 6-OHChr and, 9-OHBaP | High performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||||
| Alshaarawy et al., 2014 [ | HbA1c level ≥ 6.5% (39 mmol/mol), a self-reported physician diagnosis of diabetes, or current use of oral hypoglycemic medication or insulin. | Urinary levels of OH-PAH (ng/L) were divided by urinary creatinine level (mg/dL) multiplied by 0.01, that is, (ng/L) ÷ (mg/dL × 0.01), and expressed as nanogram per gram of creatinine (ng/g creatinine) | age, sex, ethnicity, poverty–income ratio, alcohol drinking, BMI, total cholesterol and serum cotinine | |||
| Yang et al., 2014 [ | FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, or taking oral hypoglycemic medication or insulin. | Valid urinary PAHs metabolites concentrations were calibrated by levels of urinary creatinine and calculated as nmol/mmol creatinine. | age, sex, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, education, family history of diabetes, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. | |||
| Ranjbar et al., 2015 [ | FPG ≥ 7 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, doctor diagnosed T2DM, taking diabetes medication, or were taking insulin. | Urinary creatinine was adjusted in logistic regressions model. | age, sex, poverty index ratio, ethnicity, BMI, smoking status and urinary creatinine | |||
| Smith et al., 2018 [ | HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, self-reported diagnosis of diabetes by a physician, and/or self-reported insulin use. | Exposure variables were corrected for urinary creatinine in all analyses by dividing each of the PAHs (ng/L) by urinary creatinine (mg/dL) and multiplying by 0.01 to result in nanograms of PAHs per gram of creatinine (ng/g) | age, sex, race, poverty-income ratio, and serum cotinine. | |||
| Cheng et al., 2021 [ | FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, self-reported diagnosis of diabetes, using oral antidiabetic agents or insulin | The levels of urinary creatinine (Cr) were used to calibrate each valid urinary PAH metabolite concentrations. | age, sex, BMI, drug usage, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, family income, city, and family history of diabetes | |||
| Nam et al., 2020 [ | Self-report of physician-diagnosed diabetes mellitus or the use of oral hypoglycemics or insulin. | All urinary PAH levels were adjusted for the urinary creatinine levels. | sex, age, BMI, household income, alcohol consumption, physical activity, log-transformed urinary creatinine and cotinine, and menopausal status (in women) | |||
| Lee et al., 2022 [ | Those who reported using DM medication were assumed to have T2DM. | Covariate-adjusted standardized chemical measure = Chemical concentration × the predicted Cr level/the measured Cr level; A conventional Cr adjustment was also applied | age, sex, BMI, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, education, and exercise | |||
|
| ||||||
| Yang et al., 2017 [ | Receiving diabetes medications, or FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, or self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes. | Valid urinary PAH metabolite concentrations were calibrated by levels of urinary creatinine and expressed as micrograms per millimole creatinine (mg/mmol creatinine). | working years, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, education, workshift, work sites, family history of diabetes, total cholesterol, and triglycerides | |||
| Zhang et al., 2020 [ | High FBG levels as a component of MetS: FBG > 6.10 mmol/L or current use of medication to treat hyperglycaemia. | Valid urine concentrations of PAH metabolites were adjusted using urine gravity. | sex, age, smoking, drinking, cooking fumes, eating habits, BMI, and other PAH metabolites | |||
Figure 2The association between urinary NAP metabolites and risk of T2DM [20,21,22,23,24,25,28].
Figure 3The association between urinary FLU metabolites and risk of T2DM [20,21,22,23,24,25,28].
Figure 4The association between urinary PHEN metabolites and risk of T2DM [20,21,22,23,24,25,28].
Figure 5The association between urinary 1-OHP, ΣOH-PAH metabolites, and risk of T2DM [20,21,22,23,24,25,28].