| Literature DB >> 35804788 |
Marta Giavoni1, María José Villanueva-Suárez1, Rocío De la Peña-Armada1, Alejandra Garcia-Alonso1, Inmaculada Mateos-Aparicio1.
Abstract
After orange processing, different by-products are generated, i.e., peels, seeds and pulps. The pulp is highly perishable, being an unstable food matrix that needs a preservation process to be stored and used again in the food production chain. Pasteurization is the technique of choice before aseptically packaging and storing under refrigerated conditions. In this study, the effect of pasteurization has been evaluated on the chemical, functional and sensorial profiles. Ash content decreased (p < 0.05) after the thermal treatment. Indeed, magnesium, calcium and zinc diminished, although copper was found to be higher (p < 0.05) in the pasteurized product. Total dietary fiber decreased (p < 0.05), but soluble dietary fiber raised (p < 0.05) due to hydrolysis caused by pasteurization. SDF:IDF ratio, hydration properties, and fat binding capacity were improved. Total soluble phenolic compounds remained similar but FRAP and DPPH scavenging activity decreased (p < 0.05) in the pasteurized by-product. Regarding the sensorial profile, pasteurization produced darkening, appearance of a cooked smell and an increase in bitterness. Therefore, pasteurization deteriorates the sensorial profile being able to change the attributes of an added-pasteurized-pulp juice; however, it is a good choice to preserve the orange pulp by-product to formulate food products different from juices or other beverages.Entities:
Keywords: by-product; nutritional profile; orange pulp; pasteurization; sensorial profile; waste
Year: 2022 PMID: 35804788 PMCID: PMC9266023 DOI: 10.3390/foods11131973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Characterization of non-pasteurized (NPP) and pasteurized (PP) orange pulp by-product.
| Non-Pasteurized Pulp | Pasteurized Pulp | |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture (g water/100 g f.m.) | 86.2 ± 0.2 * | 83.7 ± 0.4 |
| Brix (°degree) | 12.6 ± 0.0 | 12.9 ± 0.0 * |
| pH | 3.8 ± 0.1 * | 3.6 ± 0.0 |
| Acidity (g citric acid/100 mL) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 * |
| Formol Index (ml NaOH/100 mL) | 18.5 ± 0.7 | 18.0 ± 0.0 |
| Minerals (g ashes/100 g d.m.) | 3.2 ± 0.1 * | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
| Ascorbic acid (mg/100 g d.m.) | 17.63 ± 0.62 | 16.46 ± 0.64 |
| Citric acid (mg/100 g d.m.) | 286.58 ± 22.99 | 328.96 ± 24.94 |
| Malic acid (mg/100 g d.m.) | 74.78 ± 6.91 | 61.08 ± 6.73 |
| Insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) (g/kg d.m.) | 19.2 ± 0.94 * | 7.3 ± 0.5 |
| Soluble dietary fiber (SDF) (g/kg d.m.) | 8.9 ± 2.2 | 13.1 ± 0.9 * |
| Total dietary fiber (TDF) (g/kg d.m.) | 27.1 ± 2.0 * | 20.4 ± 1.0 |
| SDF:IDF | 0:5 | 1:8 |
| SDF:TDF | 0:3 | 0:6 |
f.m.: fresh matter; d.m., dry matter. * significantly higher (p < 0.05). n = 4.
Macro- and microelements of non-pasteurized (NPP) and pasteurized orange pulp (PP) by-products.
| Non-Pasteurized Pulp | Pasteurized Pulp | |
|---|---|---|
| Macroelements (mg/g) | ||
| Ca | 1.38 ± 0.16 * | 0.54 ± 0.03 |
| K | 2.33 ± 0.09 | 2.44 ± 0.30 |
| Na | 0.88 ± 0.23 | 1.40 ± 0.60 |
| Mg | 0.42 ± 0.05 * | 0.20 ± 0.02 |
| Microelements (µg/g) | ||
| Cu | 3.91 ± 0.82 | 6.10 ± 0.38 * |
| Fe | 26.96 ± 0.45 | 26.78 ± 0.35 |
| Mn | 2.82 ± 0.04 | 2.14 ± 0.07 |
| Zn | 13.73 ± 0.82 * | 11.42 ± 0.38 |
* significantly higher (p < 0.05), n = 4.
Figure 1Physicochemical properties of non-pasteurized and pasteurized orange pulp by-products. SC: Swelling capacity; WRC: Water retention capacity; ORC: Oil retention capacity; d.m.: dry matter.
Figure 2Scavenging activity on DPPH radical of ascorbic acid and extractable polyphenols from non-pasteurized pulp (NPP) and pasteurized pulp (PP) at 30 and 60 min.
Figure 3Radial chart about the sensorial attributes of non-pasteurized pulp (NPP) and pasteurized pulp (PP) evaluated by sensory panel.
Figure 4Discriminative results of attributes from non-pasteurized pulp (NPP) and pasteurized pulp (PP) evaluated by sensory panel.