| Literature DB >> 35804715 |
Zhaoqi Zheng1,2, Zimin An1, Xinyu Liu1, Jinghui Chen1, Yonghong Wang1.
Abstract
Bruising of the subcutaneous tissues of blueberries is an important form of mechanical damage. Different levels of bruising have a significant effect on the post-harvest marketing of blueberries. To distinguish different grades of blueberry bruises and explore the effects of different factors, explicit dynamic simulation and near-infrared hyperspectral reflectance imaging were employed without harming the blueberries in this study. Based on the results of the compression experiment, an explicit dynamic simulation of blueberries was performed to measure the potential locations of bruises and preliminarily divide the bruise stages. A near-infrared hyperspectral reflectance imaging system was used to detect the actual blueberry bruises. According to the blueberry photos taken by the near-infrared hyperspectral reflectance imaging system, the actual bruise rates of blueberries were obtained by using the Environment for Visualizing Images software for training and classification. Bruise grades of blueberries were divided accordingly. Response surface methodology was used to determine the effects of ripeness, loading speed and loading location on the blueberry bruising rate. Under the optimized parameters, the actual damage rate of blueberries was 1.1%. The results provide an important theoretical basis for the accurate and rapid identification and classification of blueberry bruise damage.Entities:
Keywords: blueberry bruise damage; finite element; hyperspectral reflectance imaging; response surface; uniaxial compression experiment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35804715 PMCID: PMC9265279 DOI: 10.3390/foods11131899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Value of K for various of .
|
| 50 | 55 | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75 | 80 | 85 | 90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.6428 | 0.5736 | 0.5000 | 0.4226 | 0.3420 | 0.2588 | 0.1736 | 0.0872 | 0.0000 |
|
| 1.198 | 1.235 | 1.267 | 1.293 | 1.314 | 1.331 | 1.342 | 1.349 | 1.351 |
Figure 1Blueberry compression and finite element model.
Figure 2Near-infrared hyperspectral reflectance system.
Figure 3Hyperspectral image processing process of blueberries.
Figure 4Blueberry load–distance curve and finite element simulation. Blueberry is compressed from O–J. The letters from O,A represent the stress state of blueberry at different compression distances, respectively. O: uncompressed blueberry; A: compression distance is 0.5 mm; B: compression distance is 1 mm; C: compression distance is 1.5 mm; D: compression distance is 2 mm; E: compression distance is 2.5 mm; F: compression distance is 3 mm; G: compression distance is 3.5 mm; H: compression distance is 4 mm; I: compression distance is 4.5 mm; J: compression distance is 5 mm.
Figure 5Spectral curve image of blueberries and hyperspectral classification image of each damage stage. The spectral curves of blueberries and background plate (a), the black curve is the background plate and the other color curves are the different positions on the blueberry fruit. The spectral curves of blueberry healthy tissue and damaged tissue (b). Hyperspectral classification images of the control group (c) and test group (d).
Bruise grades for blueberries.
| Degree of Bruise | Bruise Rate (%) | Compression刘Distance (mm) | Load (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ND | 0–7 | 0.0–0.5 | 0.00–1.17 |
| SD | 7–35 | 0.5–2.5 | 1.17–7.26 |
| MD | 35–70 | 2.5–4.0 | 7.26–12.27 |
| HD | 70–100 | 4.0–5.0 | 12.27–16.22 |
ND: no obvious bruise damage; SD: slight bruise damage; MD: moderate bruise damage; HD: harsh bruise damage.
Codes of the factors.
| Codes | Maturity | Speed (mm/s) | Load Location (°) |
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 1 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 0 | 2 | 0.5 | 90 |
| 1 | 3 | 1.0 | 180 |
Experiment schemes and results.
| No. |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 5.06 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 20.31 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 1.13 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14.69 |
| 5 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 10.93 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 27.12 |
| 7 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 14.69 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 31.42 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 18.13 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 12.57 |
| 11 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 22.13 |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15.63 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.35 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.76 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.18 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.32 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.13 |
ANOVA of the bruise rate.
| Items | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 928.07 | 9 | 103.12 | 61.07 | <0.0001 *** |
|
| 470.18 | 1 | 470.18 | 278.43 | <0.0001 *** |
|
| 58.37 | 1 | 58.37 | 34.57 | 0.0006 *** |
|
| 27.99 | 1 | 27.99 | 16.58 | 0.0047 ** |
|
| 0.91 | 1 | 0.91 | 0.54 | 0.4857 |
|
| 0.073 | 1 | 0.073 | 0.043 | 0.8413 |
|
| 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.7139 |
|
| 17.48 | 1 | 17.48 | 10.35 | 0.0147 * |
|
| 10.54 | 1 | 10.54 | 6.24 | 0.0411 * |
|
| 330.13 | 1 | 330.13 | 195.50 | <0.0001 *** |
| Residual | 11.82 | 7 | 1.69 | ||
| Lack of fit | 2.80 | 3 | 0.93 | 0.41 | 0.7529 |
| Pure error | 9.02 | 4 | 2.26 | ||
| Cor total | 939.89 | 16 |
= 0.9874; Adj. = 0.9713; Pred. = 0.9371; Adeq. Precision = 30.540; CV = 9.03%. The Pred. of 0.9371 is in reasonable agreement with the Adj. of 0.9713. Adeq Precision measures the signal to noise ratio. A ratio greater than 4 is desirable. The ratio of 30.540 indicates an adequate signal. This model can be used to navigate the design space. *: p < 0.05, the difference is significant. **: p < 0.01, the difference is very significant. ***: p < 0.001, the difference is extremely significant.
Figure 6Response surface of influencing factors. Response surface for the effect of loading speed and maturity on bruising rate (a), response surface for the effect of loading position and maturity on bruising rate (b), and response surface for the effect of loading position and loading speed on bruising rate (c).